HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McBride, L. R. Articles by Barner, H. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McBride, L. R. Articles by Barner, H. B.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 100, 36-42, Copyright © 1990 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Aortic valve decalcification

LR McBride, KS Naunheim, AC Fiore, HH Harris, VL Willman, GC Kaiser, DG Pennington, AJ Labovitz and HB Barner
Department of Surgery, St. Louis University Medical Center, Mo. 63110- 0250.

Ultrasonic decalcification of the aortic valve was performed in 22 elderly patients with critical aortic stenosis (aortic valve areas less than 0.8 cm2) as an alternative to prosthetic valve replacement. All of the patients had symptoms. The mean New York Heart Association class was 3.3 +/- 0.9. Adequate decalcification with restoration of leaflet mobility was achieved in all patients, including seven with bicuspid aortic valves. Leaflet perforation occurred and was successfully repaired in five patients. Ten patients underwent concomitant myocardial revascularization. There were two operative deaths (9%) and three late deaths. Echocardiograms were obtained preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 6 months. The mean aortic valve area increased significantly from 0.72 +/- 0.17 to 1.42 +/- 0.31 cm2 (p less than 0.001) and the peak gradient decreased from 74 +/- 34 to 25 +/- 13 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). At 6 months the aortic valve area (1.29 +/- 0.48 cm2) and peak gradient (31 +/- 12 mm Hg) continued to be significantly better than the preoperative measurements (p less than 0.001), but the 6-month aortic valve area was slightly decreased and the gradient increased when compared with the immediate postoperative values (p less than 0.02). The prevalence of mild to moderate aortic insufficiency increased from 50% of the patients preoperatively to 87% at 6 months (p less than 0.05). Two patients subsequently required aortic valve replacement for restenosis and aortic insufficiency. Ultrasonic decalcification is effective in relieving aortic stenosis, but subsequent restenosis and insufficiency may limit its application.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. E. David Aortic Valve Repair and Aortic Valve Sparing Operations Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 935 - 948. [Full Text]

				T. E. David Aortic Valve Repair and Aortic Valve-Sparing Operations Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 811 - 824. [Full Text]

				P. Ghosh Ultrasonic Devices in Cardiac Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 1999; 7(4): 333 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Fiore, M. T. Swartz, K. S. Naunheim, D. A. Moroney, D. A. Canvasser, L. R. McBride, P. S. Peigh, G. C. Kaiser, and V. L. Willman Management of Asymptomatic Mild Aortic Stenosis During Coronary Artery Operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1996; 61(6): 1693 - 1697. [Abstract] [Full Text]