JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Barratt-Boyes, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Barratt-Boyes, B. G.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 100, 167-174, Copyright © 1990 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Rest and exercise hemodynamics of 20 to 23 mm allograft, Medtronic Intact (porcine), and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position

WM Jaffe, HA Coverdale, AH Roche, RM Whitlock, JM Neutze and BG Barratt-Boyes
Department of Cardiology, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Doppler echocardiography was used to measure gradients and valve areas at rest and after supine bicycle exercise in 35 patients with valve replacements 20 to 23 mm in size. Thirteen patients with a St. Jude Medical valve (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, Minn.) were matched to 13 patients with an allograft valve, and seven patients with a Medtronic Intact (porcine) valve (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.) to seven patients with an allograft valve. Patients were matched for age, sex, valve size, body surface area, and left ventricular systolic function. There was no statistically significant difference between the matched groups for body surface areas, resting cardiac output, exercise heart rate, or workload achieved. Mean pressure gradient was higher for St. Jude Medical than for allograft groups, both at rest (11.8 +/- 6.67 mm Hg for St. Jude Medical versus 6.67 +/- 2.98 mm Hg for allografts) and after exercise (16.4 +/- 8.47 mm Hg versus 9.7 +/- 3.94 mm Hg), but the differences were of borderline significance (p = 0.016 and 0.027, respectively). Valve area at rest was similar for both devices (1.4 +/- 0.45 cm2 for St. Jude Medical versus 1.8 +/- 0.56 cm2 for allograft; p greater than 0.1). There were highly significant differences between patients with Intact and those with allograft valves for resting mean pressure gradient (19.3 +/- 4.23 mm Hg for Intact versus 5.9 +/- 3.68 mm Hg for allograft; p less than 0.001) and for exercise mean pressure gradient (27.8 +/- 8.63 mm Hg versus 8.1 +/- 8.43 mm Hg; p less than 0.001). The differences between the valve areas at rest also were significant (1.1 +/- 0.12 cm2 versus 2.2 +/- 0.62 cm2; p less than 0.01). It is concluded that when a tissue valve is indicated in patients with a small aortic root, the freehand allograft aortic valve is an ideal device from the hemodynamic perspective and is superior to the Intact valve. It is also probably superior in this respect to the St. Jude Medical valve, although the analysis may be biased slightly in favor of the allograft valve.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Chiappini, B. Absil, J. Rubay, P. Noirhomme, J.-C. Funken, R. Verhelst, A. Poncelet, and G. El Khoury
The Ross Procedure: Clinical and Echocardiographic Follow-Up in 219 Consecutive Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1285 - 1289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
M. Salehi, R. Sattarzadeh, A. A. Soleimani, H. Radmehr, J. Mirhosseini, and M. Sanatkar Far
The Ross Operation: Clinical Results and Echocardiographic Findings
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, February 1, 2007; 15(1): 30 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
I. Martinovic, I. Farah, M. Everlien, S. Lindemann, I. Knez, T. Wittlinger, H. Greve, and P. Vogt
Eight-year results after aortic valve replacement with the CryoLife-O'Brien Stentless Aortic Porcine Bioprosthesis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2005; 130(3): 777 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. A. Fullerton, J. W. Fredericksen, R. S. Sundaresan, and K. A. Horvath
The Ross procedure in adults: intermediate-term results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 471 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A.C. Yankah, H. Klose, M. Musci, H. Siniawski, and R. Hetzer
Geometric mismatch between homograft (allograft) and native aortic root: a 14-year clinical experience
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 835 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. Vitale, I. Caldarera, C. Muneretto, R. Sinatra, A. Scafuri, E. Di Rosa, A. Contini, N. Tedesco, A. Pierangeli, M. Abbate, et al.
Clinical evaluation of St Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus versus standard aortic valve prostheses: The Italian multicenter, prospective, randomized study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2001; 122(4): 691 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Pibarot and J. G. Dumesnil
Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1131 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. P. Wong, M. E. Legget, S. C. Greaves, B. G. Barratt-Boyes, F. P. Milsom, and P. J. Raudkivi
Early experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis: a new generation porcine valve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 69(6): 1846 - 1850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. Fries, O. Wendler, H. Schieffer, and H.-J. Schafers
Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of 23-mm stentless versus 23-mm stented aortic bioprostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 69(3): 817 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
N. Madhu Sankar, S. Rajan, R. K. Kalyan Singh, and K. M. Cherian
Enlargement of Small Aortic Annulus by Modified Manouguian's Technique
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 1999; 7(4): 282 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. L. Yun, C. F. Sintek, A. D. Fletcher, T. A. Pfeffer, G. S. Kochamba, M. R. Hyde, J. O. Torpoco, and S. Khonsari
Aortic Valve Replacement With the Freestyle Stentless Bioprosthesis : Five-Year Experience
Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100(90002): II-17 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Pibarot, J. G. Dumesnil, J. Jobin, P. Cartier, G. Honos, and L.-G. Durand
Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1609 - 1617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. E. Rubay, M. Buche, G. A. El Khoury, J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde, T. Sluysmans, B. Marchandise, J.-C. Schoevaerdts, and R. A. Dion
The Ross operation: mid-term results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1999; 67(5): 1355 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. J. Eriksson, G.o. Kallner, S. Rosfors, T. Ivert, and L.-A. Brodin
Hemodynamic performance of cryopreserved aortic homograft valves during midterm follow-up
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1998; 32(4): 1002 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. T. Christakis, K. J. Buth, B. S. Goldman, S. E. Fremes, V. Rao, G. Cohen, M. A. Borger, and R. D. Weisel
Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: a proposed standard for valve size nomenclature
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1998; 66(4): 1198 - 1203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
N. Cam, H. Gercekoglu, S. Celik, M. Gursurer, G. Tayyareci, H. Karabulut, A. Narin, T. Tezel, and B. Yigiter
Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 166 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Westaby, X. Y. Jin, T. Katsumata, A. Arifi, and P. Braidley
Valve replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis: Versatility of theporcine aortic root
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1998; 116(3): 477 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Hasegawa, S. Kitamura, S. Taniguchi, T. Kawata, K. Niwaya, K. Mizuguchi, H. Nishioka, and Y. Kameda
Comparative Rest and Exercise Hemodynamics of Allograft and Prosthetic Valves in the Aortic Position
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1997; 64(6): 1753 - 1756.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. Weinert, R. Karp, P. Vignon, A. Bales, and R. M. Lang
FEASIBILITY OF AORTIC DIAMETER MEASUREMENT BY MULTIPLANE TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR PREOPERATIVE SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF HOMOGRAFT AORTIC VALVES
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 1996; 112(4): 954 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Carrel, U. Zingg, R. Jenni, B. Aeschbacher, and M. I. Turina
Early In Vivo Experience With the Hemodynamic Plus St. Jude Medical Heart Valves in Patients With Narrowed Aortic Annulus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1996; 61(5): 1418 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Laske, R. Jenni, M. Maloigne, G. Vassalli, O. Bertel, and M. I. Turina
Pressure Gradients Across Bileaflet Aortic Valves by Direct Measurement and Echocardiography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1996; 61(1): 48 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. L. Jones, V. B. Shah, J. S. Shanewise, T. D. Martin, R. P. Martin, J. A. Coto, R. Broniec, and Y. Shen
Should the Freehand Allograft Be Abandoned as a Reliable Alternative for Aortic Valve Replacement?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1995; 59(6): 1397 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. D. Kon, S. Westaby, N. Amarasena, R. Pillai, and A. R. Cordell
Comparison of Implantation Techniques Using Freestyle Stentless Porcine Aortic Valve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1995; 59(4): 857 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Khan, A. Chaux, J. Matloff, C. Blanche, M. DeRobertis, R. Kass, T. P. Tsai, A. Trento, S. Nessim, R. Gray, et al.
The St. Jude Medical valveExperience with 1000 cases
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1994; 108(6): 1010 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
E.G. Cape, W. Jaarsma, and A.P. Yoganathan
Echo Doppler principles, techniques and applications for the cardiac surgeon
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S2 - S12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
B.G. Barratt-Boyes, G.W. Christie, and P.J. Raudkivi
The stentless bioprosthesis: surgical challenges and implications for long-term durability
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S39 - S43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
F. Vermeulen, G. Bennink, S. Ernst, W. Jaarsma, P.A. Chevalier, and D.V. Lutz
The intact porcine bioprosthesis: early world-wide clinical experience and analysis of a single institution's experience
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S124 - S127.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1990 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.