HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gonzalez-Lavin, L. Articles by Graf, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gonzalez-Lavin, L. Articles by Graf, D.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 101, 75-80, Copyright © 1991 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

The pericardial valve in the aortic position ten years later

L Gonzalez-Lavin, J Gonzalez-Lavin, S Chi, B Lewis, S Amini and D Graf
Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, N.J.

To assess the behavior of the pericardial valve at 10 years after implantation, the cases of 240 patients who had undergone aortic valve replacement with the standard Ionescu-Shiley (Shiley, Inc., Irvine, Calif.) bovine pericardial valve between February 1977 and December 1983 were reassessed. Follow-up of the 224 hospital survivors was 99.6% complete. Fifty-seven valve-related events occurred. Fourteen were thrombotic events (1.2%/patient-year), 28 were intrinsic tissue failures (2.4%/patient-year), 13 were cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis (1.1%/patient-year), and 2 were paravalvular leaks (0.17%/patient-year). The linearized rate for death, reoperation, or both resulting from valve-related events was 3.6%/patient-year. Time- related hazard function for the instantaneous risk of death and/or reoperation resulting from valve-related events demonstrated an exponential increase after 80 months. These data, in conjunction with our previous reports on the histologic changes in pericardial collagen and the incidence of calcification (26/28), should be considered regarding new and future generations of pericardial bioprostheses. Although this device provides good hemodynamics and carries a low incidence of thromboembolism, it has a limited durability. New generations of pericardial valves may have improved structural features, but the behavior of glutaraldehyde-fixed, formaldehyde-stored bovine pericardium as currently selected and prepared is unlikely to change.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Huth, A. Friedl, A. Rost, and for the GELIA Study Investigator Group Intensity of oral anticoagulation after implantation of St. Jude Medical aortic prosthesis: analysis of the GELIA Database (GELIA 4) Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2001; 3(suppl_Q): Q33 - Q38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Stahle Homograft--the optimal aortic valve substitute? Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2000; 21(20): 1644 - 1647. [PDF]

				T. Le Tourneau, C. Savoye, E. P. McFadden, D. Grandmougin, H.-F. Carton, J.-L. Hennequin, A. Dubar, G. Fayad, and H. Warembourg Mid-Term Comparative Follow-Up After Aortic Valve Replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Pericarbon Pericardial Prostheses Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100 (2009): II-11 - II-16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Borowiec, T. W. Dubiel, H.-E. Hansson, J. Landelius, S.-O. Nystrom, and J. W. Borowiec Pericarbon Pericardial Valve Prosthesis: Midterm Results of the Aortic Valve Replacement Angiology, January 1, 1998; 49(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. Moggio, R. W. Pooley, M. R. Sarabu, J. Christiana, A. W. Ho, and G. E. Reed Experience with the Mitroflow aortic bioprosthesis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1994; 108(2): 215 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text]