JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peduzzi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Holford, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peduzzi, P.
Right arrow Articles by Holford, T.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 101, 481-487, Copyright © 1991 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Intent-to-treat analysis and the problem of crossovers. An example from the Veterans Administration coronary bypass surgery study

P Peduzzi, K Detre, J Wittes and T Holford
Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Veterans Administration Medical Center, West Haven, Conn. 06516.

In randomized clinical trials of treatment for ischemic heart disease that compare medical with surgical treatment, many persons initially assigned to medical therapy eventually receive surgical intervention. For example, in the three major trials of bypass grafting for stable angina, crossover rates from medical to surgical therapy were approximately 25% at 5 years. For this reason, the classic intent-to- treat analyses have been criticized for their inability to evaluate the "true" effect of treatment. In this article we emphasize the concept of "initial treatment" as it applies to intent-to-treat analyses and examine four proposed alternative methods of analysis based on adherence with survival data from the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study to illustrate the concepts. The alternative methods include (1) censoring crossovers when treatment changes, (2) transferring crossovers from the original to the new treatment group when treatment changes, (3) excluding all crossovers from analysis, and (4) counting crossovers from the date of randomization in the treatment ultimately received group. We point out the biases attendant on analyses based on adherence and reaffirm the validity of intent-to- treat analysis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. J. Walline, L. A. Jones, L. Sinnott, R. E. Manny, A. Gaume, M. J. Rah, M. Chitkara, S. Lyons, and on behalf of the ACHIEVE Study Group
A Randomized Trial of the Effect of Soft Contact Lenses on Myopia Progression in Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 4702 - 4706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. M. Justice, A. Mashburn, K. L. Pence, and A. Wiggins
Experimental Evaluation of a Preschool Language Curriculum: Influence on Children's Expressive Language Skills
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2008; 51(4): 983 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
J. Gravel, L. Opatrny, and S. Shapiro
The intention-to-treat approach in randomized controlled trials: Are authors saying what they do and doing what they say?
Clinical Trials, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 350 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
T. Greene, J. Daugirdas, T. Depner, M. Allon, G. Beck, C. Chumlea, J. Delmez, F. Gotch, J. W. Kusek, N. Levin, et al.
Association of Achieved Dialysis Dose with Mortality in the Hemodialysis Study: An Example of "Dose-Targeting Bias"
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 3371 - 3380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
J. J. Walline, L. A. Jones, D. O. Mutti, and K. Zadnik
A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Rigid Contact Lenses on Myopia Progression
Arch Ophthalmol, December 1, 2004; 122(12): 1760 - 1766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Pablos-Mendez, R. G. Barr, and S. Shea
Run-in Periods in Randomized Trials: Implications for the Application of Results in Clinical Practice
JAMA, January 21, 1998; 279(3): 222 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. C. Nicolau, R. V. Ardito, S. A. C. Garzon, M. A. F. V. Pinto, P. R. Nogueira, A. M. Lorga, and J. L. B. Jacob
Surgical revascularization after fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarctionLong-term follow-up
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1994; 107(6): 1454 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1991 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.