JTCS Concomitant Website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawasuji, M.
Right arrow Articles by Iwa, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kawasuji, M.
Right arrow Articles by Iwa, T.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 103, 849-854, Copyright © 1992 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Exercise response assessed by continuous monitoring of ventricular function in patients with coronary bypass operations

M Kawasuji, H Takemura, T Tedoriya, S Sawa, J Taki and T Iwa
Department of Surgery (I), Kanazawa University School of Medicine, Japan.

The response of left ventricular function during exercise and recovery after exercise was assessed in 35 patients with coronary artery bypass grafting before and after the operation by means of a continuous ventricular function monitor, which records serial beat-to-beat radionuclide data and calculates left ventricular ejection fractions every 20 seconds. The mean ejection fraction decreased with graded bicycle exercise from 48% +/- 9% to 41% +/- 11% (p less than 0.001) before operation but increased with exercise from 50% +/- 9% to 55% +/- 11% (p less than 0.001) after operation. Cardiac response was divided into four types with respect to the profiles of the ejection fractions during exercise. Type A continued to increase; type B initially increased but then decreased in late exercise stages; type C did not change significantly; type D continued to decrease. Most patients had type C or D responses before operation but type A after operation. Seven patients with occluded grafts or ungrafted coronary arteries had type B or D responses. Three patients with complete revascularization, including an internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein grafts, had type B responses. Three patients with extensive infarction and poor left ventricular function showed type C. In the early recovery period after exercise, most patients had an "overshoot" elevation of ejection fraction. The mean value increased from 59% +/- 10% before operation to 64% +/- 11% after operation (p less than 0.01). The recovery time after exercise was reduced from 2.8 minutes before operation to 1.8 minutes after operation (p less than 0.001). The continuous ventricular function monitor elucidated changes in left ventricular function both during exercise and recovery after exercise, as well as unmasking abnormalities in left ventricular function after coronary bypass operation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.