JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pirolo, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pirolo, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, T. B., Jr

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 103, 969-979, Copyright © 1992 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Noninvasive detection of cardiac allograft rejection by prospective telemetric monitoring

JS Pirolo, TS Shuman, EM Brunt, MJ Liptay, JL Cox and TB Ferguson Jr
Department of Surgery, Barnes Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

A method for cardiac allograft surveillance that is less invasive than endomyocardial biopsy is needed. A fall in the unipolar peak-to-peak amplitude recorded from cardiac allografts has been shown to detect rejection when retrospectively compared with endomyocardial biopsy. This study was performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of prospective telemetric unipolar peak-to-peak amplitude surveillance in detecting rejection of heterotopic canine cardiac allografts occurring through triple drug immunosuppression. Native heart and graft amplitudes were telemetrically acquired on a daily basis. A fall in normalized unipolar peak-to-peak graft amplitude to less than 85% was used as an indication for biopsy. A quantitative rejection score was calculated for each endomyocardial biopsy (rejection score greater than 0.66 = histologic rejection). Rejection was documented in all animals. Thirty-six biopsies were performed (10 control biopsies and 26 amplitude-directed biopsies); 25 of the 36 demonstrated rejection. Sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 91%, respectively. A linear correlation between unipolar peak-to-peak amplitude and rejection severity was seen (R = 0.87, p less than 0.001). The first true positive amplitude was associated with mild-to-moderate rejection (rejection score = 1.63 +/- 0.45). Unipolar peak-to-peak amplitude recorded from native hearts remained stable during allograft rejection. It is concluded that prospective, telemetric cardiac allograft surveillance can accurately detect rejection occurring through ongoing immunosuppression.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. E. Everett, M. N. Palmer, J. Jessurun, and S. J. Shumway
Noninvasive Diagnosis of Cardiac Allograft Rejection in an Orthotopic Canine Model
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1996; 62(5): 1337 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.