HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lam, T. C. Articles by Wong, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lam, T. C. Articles by Wong, J.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 104, 395-400, Copyright © 1992 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses

TC Lam, M Fok, SW Cheng and J Wong
Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, China.

Leakage, tumor recurrence, and stricture formation at the anastomosis are serious problems after esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus or cardia. Because the prevalence of these postoperative complications may be affected by whether an anastomosis is made in the neck or in the chest, a comparison was made between anastomoses made at these two sites. During a period of some 7 years, we studied prospectively 411 patients who underwent resection for cancer of the esophagus or cardia and, after immediate reconstruction, had an anastomosis made in the neck or chest. The anastomotic leak rate for the neck anastomosis group was 4.3% and for the chest anastomosis group, 3.7% (p = not significant). The difference between leak rates of anastomoses fashioned by hand-sewn (5.0%) or stapled (3.0%) techniques was also not significant. The median upper resection margins in the neck and chest anastomosis groups were 4.5 cm and 3.5 cm, respectively. The corresponding rates of anastomotic tumor recurrence were 6.1% and 8.1% (p = not significant). The prevalence of benign stricture formation was significantly higher in the chest anastomosis group (19.2%) than in the neck anastomosis group (9.0%) (p = 0.002). This difference was a reflection of a significantly increased prevalence of stricture formation when an anastomosis was made by the stapler technique than with the hand-sewn method, and whereas most of the anastomoses in the neck were hand sewn (90%) the majority of those in the chest were stapled (80%). There were thus no statistically significant differences between the sites in terms of anastomotic leak and tumor recurrence rates, and the higher stricture rate in the chest anastomosis group was the result of more stapled anastomoses.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Y. Al-Rawi, S. H. Pennefather, R. D. Page, I. Dave, and G. N. Russell The Effect of Thoracic Epidural Bupivacaine and an Intravenous Adrenaline Infusion on Gastric Tube Blood Flow During Esophagectomy Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 884 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Akowuah, M. Junemann-Ramirez, O. Kalejayie, and J. Rahamim Inkwelling increases benign stricture formation after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 581 - 582. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Page, M. J. Shackcloth, G. N. Russell, and S. H. Pennefather Surgical treatment of anastomotic leaks after oesophagectomy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 337 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Law, D. T. K. Suen, K.-H. Wong, K.-F. Kwok, and J. Wong A Single-Layer, Continuous, Hand-Sewn Method for Esophageal Anastomosis: Prospective Evaluation in 218 Patients Arch Surg, January 1, 2005; 140(1): 33 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schintler, A. Maier, V. Matzi, and F.M. Smolle-Juttner Vacuum assisted closure system in the management of cervical anastomotic leakage after gastric pull-up Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, March 1, 2004; 3(1): 92 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W H Allum, S M Griffin, A Watson, and D Colin-Jones Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer Gut, June 1, 2002; 50 (2007): v1 - v23. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. McManus, V. Anikin, and J. McGuigan Total thoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal carcinoma: has it been worth it? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 16(3): 261 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Frank, R. C. Montgomery, T. E. LeVoyer, and M. Goldberg Pleural incarceration of the gastric graft after trans-hiatal esophagectomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1999; 68(1): 250 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. F. Heitmiller, S. J. McQuone, and D. W. Eisele The Utility Of The Pectoralis Myocutaneous Flap In The Management Of Select Cervical Esophageal Anastomotic Complications J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1998; 115(6): 1250 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-M. Collard, R. Romagnoli, L. Goncette, J.-B. Otte, and P.-J. Kestens Terminalized Semimechanical Side-to-Side Suture Technique for Cervical Esophagogastrostomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1998; 65(3): 814 - 817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Honkoop, P. D. Siersema, H. W. Tilanus, L. P. S. Stassen, W. C. J. Hop, and M. van Blankenstein BENIGN ANASTOMOTIC STRICTURES AFTER TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY AND CERVICAL ESOPHAGOGASTROSTOMY: RISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1996; 111(6): 1141 - 1148. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. D. Iannettoni, R. I. Whyte, and M. B. Orringer CATASTROPHIC COMPLICATIONS OF THE CERVICAL ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 1995; 110(5): 1493 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text]