|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 104, 1639-1646, Copyright © 1992 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
K Minami, K Vyska and R Korfer
Effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion on capacity system were
investigated in 33 open-chest mongrel dogs with extracorporeal circulation.
In 28 dogs with intact carotid sinus nerves, after changing from
nonpulsatile to pulsatile systemic perfusion the mean arterial pressure
decreased by 14 +/- 1.5 mm Hg, peripheral resistance by 423 +/- 15
dyne.cm-5.sec, and venous blood volume by 3.3 +/- 0.4 ml/kg. After changing
from pulsatile perfusion to nonpulsatile systemic perfusion the mean
arterial pressure increased by 15 +/- 2.2 mm Hg, the peripheral resistance
by 431 +/- 15 dyne.cm-5.sec, and venous volume by 3.9 +/- 0.5 ml/kg. The
same effects were observed in five dogs with bilateral isolated carotid
pulsatile perfusion or nonpulsatile perfusion and systemic nonpulsatile
perfusion. These effects were abolished after denervation of pressor
receptors and pharmacologic blockade of alpha and beta receptors. It is
proposed that with nonpulsatile perfusion carotid sinus-mediated
vasoconstriction occurs in the downstream part of the capacitive system,
where more pronounced wall musculature with increased number of adrenergic
receptors is present. The throttle effect caused by this "resistance" part
of venous circulation leads to increase of pressure in the upstream section
of the capacitive system, compensates for the constrictive effect of the
sympathetic tone, and leads finally to an increased volume of the capacity
system. We conclude that venous response to different perfusion modalities
is critically dependent on intact carotid sinus nerves and adrenergic
receptors in the veins.
ARTICLES
Role of the carotid sinus in response of integrated venous system to pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center North Rhine-Westfalia, University of Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Yoda, D. Boethig, D. Fritzsche, D. Horstkotte, R. Koerfer, and K. Minami Operative outcome of simultaneous carotid and valvular surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 549 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rottenberg, E. Sondak, J. Borman, E. Dviri, and G. Uretzky Early experience with a true pulsatile pump for heart surgery Perfusion, May 1, 1995; 10(3): 171 - 175. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. J. Chiu Biophysics of pulsatile perfusion J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 1995; 109(4): 810 - 810. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Bartlett Invited letter concerning: Nonpulsatile flow--A noncontroversy J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1994; 107(2): 644 - 646. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |