HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reul, H. Articles by Rau, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reul, H. Articles by Rau, G.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 106, 412-420, Copyright © 1993 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin- Bicarbon valves

H Reul, JA van Son, U Steinseifer, B Schmitz, A Schmidt, C Schmitz and G Rau
Helmholtz-Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Aachen University of Technology, Germany.

The hydrodynamic performance of four currently used bileaflet heart valve prostheses (St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards- Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon) with a nominal tissue anulus diameter of 27 mm were measured in the aortic position. All experiments were performed in nonpulsatile flow and in an electrohydraulic, computer- controlled pulse duplicator simulating the left side of the human circulatory system. Testing conditions were set at cardiac outputs of 3.0, 4.5, 6.5, and 8.0 L/min at a constant heart rate of 70 beats/min. The Sorin-Bicarbon valve had the lowest pressure difference with regard to nonpulsatile (mean 5.4 mm Hg at 30 L/min) and pulsatile (mean 2.2 mm Hg at 8 L/min) flow, followed by the St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, and modified Edwards-Duromedics valves. The leakage volumes under static and pulsatile flow conditions were lowest for the modified Edwards- Duromedics and Sorin-Bicarbon valves. The energy loss in pulsatile flow was lowest for the Sorin-Bicarbon valve, mainly because its systolic, closure, and leakage energy losses were low. Systolic sequential velocity profiles showed the most even flow distribution pattern for the St. Jude Medical and Sorin-Bicarbon valves. These findings correspond with lower overall Reynolds shear stress levels for the St. Jude Medical and the Sorin-Bicarbon valves than for the modified Edwards-Duromedics and CarboMedics valves.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Fries, T. Graeter, D. Aicher, H. Reul, C. Schmitz, M. Bohm, and H.-J. Schafers In vitro comparison of aortic valve movement after valve-preserving aortic replacement J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 32 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. De Carlo, A. D. Milano, C. Nardi, G. Mecozzi, and U. Bortolotti Serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of small-sized sorin bicarbon prostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 337 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-L. Leo, Z. He, J. T. Ellis, and A. P. Yoganathan Microflow fields in the hinge region of the CarboMedics bileaflet mechanical heart valve design J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2002; 124(3): 561 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Kadir, I. Y.P. Wan, C. Walsh, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini Hemodynamic performance of the 21-mm Sorin Bicarbon mechanical aortic prostheses using dobutamine Doppler echocardiography Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 72(1): 49 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Knez, R. Rienmuller, R. Maier, P. Rehak, B. Schrottner, H. Machler, M. Anelli-Monti, and B. Rigler Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 19(6): 797 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.B. Borman, W.G.B. Brands, L. Camilleri, M. Cotrufo, W. Daenen, I. Gandjbakhch, C. Infantes, A. Khayat, F. Laborde, A. Pellegrini, et al. Bicarbon valve - European multicenter clinical evaluation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 13(6): 685 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. K. Podesser, G. Khuenl-Brady, E. Eigenbauer, S. Roedler, A. Schmiedberger, E. Wolner, and A. Moritz Long-term results of heart valve replacement with the Edwards Duromedics bileaflet prosthesis: A prospective ten-year clinical follow-up J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1998; 115(5): 1121 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Laske, R. Jenni, M. Maloigne, G. Vassalli, O. Bertel, and M. I. Turina Pressure Gradients Across Bileaflet Aortic Valves by Direct Measurement and Echocardiography Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1996; 61(1): 48 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text]