|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 106, 664-670, Copyright © 1993 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association
TR Townsend, BA Reitz, WB Bilker and JG Bartlett
A relatively large number of comparative trials of antibiotic prophylaxis
in cardiac surgery have been published, many of which have serious design
flaws. Despite the large number of studies, no single antibiotic regimen
has emerged as clearly superior in preventing postoperative site
infections. To determine if a superior regimen could be identified with a
study designed to avoid flaws found in previous studies, we undertook a
randomized, double-blind clinical trial of three cephalosporins. From March
1987 to February 1990, 2759 adults underwent median sternotomies: 1641
completed study participation, 203 were enrolled but were dropped from the
study for protocol violations, and 815 were excluded. The characteristics
of all 2759 patients were recorded with respect to case mix and infection
risk factors, and the patients were followed-up by the same nurse
throughout hospitalization and for 6 weeks after discharge for the
assessment of infection outcome status. Of the 1641 participants, 141
(8.6%) had one or more operative site infections: 46 of 549 (8.4%)
cefamandole recipients, 46 of 547 (8.4%) cefazolin recipients, and 49 of
545 (9.0%) cefuroxime recipients (p = 0.92). The sites of infection and the
depth of tissue involvement were not significantly different across groups.
Because no differences in effectiveness in preventing postoperative site
infections were demonstrated in a rigorously designed trial, the costs of
the drugs, including the costs of their preparation and delivery, may be
the only variables by which to choose among these three antibiotic
prophylaxis regimens.
ARTICLES
Clinical trial of cefamandole, cefazolin, and cefuroxime for antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac operations
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Gongora and T. M. Sundt III Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 599 - 632. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mastoraki, A. Michalopoulos, I. Kriaras, and S. Geroulanos Cefuroxime as antibiotic prophylaxis in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2007; 6(4): 442 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Engelman, D. Shahian, R. Shemin, T. S. Guy, D. Bratzler, F. Edwards, M. Jacobs, H. Fernando, and C. Bridges The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cardiac Surgery, Part II: Antibiotic Choice Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1569 - 1576. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Mangi, I. F. Palacios, and D. F. Torchiana Catheter pericardiocentesis for delayed tamponade after cardiac valve operation Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1479 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Finkelstein, G. Rabino, T. Mashiah, Y. Bar-El, Z. Adler, V. Kertzman, O. Cohen, and S. Milo Vancomycin versus cefazolin prophylaxis for cardiac surgery in the setting of a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2002; 123(2): 326 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Saginur, D. Croteau, and M. G. Bergeron Comparative efficacy of teicoplanin and cefazolin for cardiac operation prophylaxis in 3027 patients J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2000; 120(6): 1120 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Jakob, M. Borneff-Lipp, A. Bach, S. von Puckler, J. Windeler, H.-G. Sonntag, and S. Hagl The endogenous pathway is a major route for deep sternal wound infection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 17(2): 154 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |