JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, J. G.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 106, 664-670, Copyright © 1993 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association


ARTICLES

Clinical trial of cefamandole, cefazolin, and cefuroxime for antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac operations

TR Townsend, BA Reitz, WB Bilker and JG Bartlett
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.

A relatively large number of comparative trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery have been published, many of which have serious design flaws. Despite the large number of studies, no single antibiotic regimen has emerged as clearly superior in preventing postoperative site infections. To determine if a superior regimen could be identified with a study designed to avoid flaws found in previous studies, we undertook a randomized, double-blind clinical trial of three cephalosporins. From March 1987 to February 1990, 2759 adults underwent median sternotomies: 1641 completed study participation, 203 were enrolled but were dropped from the study for protocol violations, and 815 were excluded. The characteristics of all 2759 patients were recorded with respect to case mix and infection risk factors, and the patients were followed-up by the same nurse throughout hospitalization and for 6 weeks after discharge for the assessment of infection outcome status. Of the 1641 participants, 141 (8.6%) had one or more operative site infections: 46 of 549 (8.4%) cefamandole recipients, 46 of 547 (8.4%) cefazolin recipients, and 49 of 545 (9.0%) cefuroxime recipients (p = 0.92). The sites of infection and the depth of tissue involvement were not significantly different across groups. Because no differences in effectiveness in preventing postoperative site infections were demonstrated in a rigorously designed trial, the costs of the drugs, including the costs of their preparation and delivery, may be the only variables by which to choose among these three antibiotic prophylaxis regimens.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
E. Gongora and T. M. Sundt III
Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 599 - 632.
[Full Text]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
S. Mastoraki, A. Michalopoulos, I. Kriaras, and S. Geroulanos
Cefuroxime as antibiotic prophylaxis in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2007; 6(4): 442 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. Engelman, D. Shahian, R. Shemin, T. S. Guy, D. Bratzler, F. Edwards, M. Jacobs, H. Fernando, and C. Bridges
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cardiac Surgery, Part II: Antibiotic Choice
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1569 - 1576.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. A. Mangi, I. F. Palacios, and D. F. Torchiana
Catheter pericardiocentesis for delayed tamponade after cardiac valve operation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1479 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. Finkelstein, G. Rabino, T. Mashiah, Y. Bar-El, Z. Adler, V. Kertzman, O. Cohen, and S. Milo
Vancomycin versus cefazolin prophylaxis for cardiac surgery in the setting of a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2002; 123(2): 326 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. Saginur, D. Croteau, and M. G. Bergeron
Comparative efficacy of teicoplanin and cefazolin for cardiac operation prophylaxis in 3027 patients
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2000; 120(6): 1120 - 1130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
H. G. Jakob, M. Borneff-Lipp, A. Bach, S. von Puckler, J. Windeler, H.-G. Sonntag, and S. Hagl
The endogenous pathway is a major route for deep sternal wound infection
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 17(2): 154 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1993 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.