HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Salo, J. A. Articles by Mattila, S. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Salo, J. A. Articles by Mattila, S. P.

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol 106, 1088-1091, Copyright © 1993 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association

ARTICLES

Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. Esophagectomy or primary repair?

JA Salo, JO Isolauri, LJ Heikkila, HT Markkula, LO Heikkinen, EO Kivilaakso and SP Mattila
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.

Ninety patients with esophageal perforations were operated on at our institutions between 1970 and 1992. Thirty-four of them were seen after delayed diagnosis (> 24 hours) with mediastinal sepsis caused by perforation of the thoracic esophagus. There were 18 patients with spontaneous ruptures, 11 with instrumental perforations (including one caused during laparotomy), and 3 perforations caused by foreign bodies. One patient had perforation of an esophageal ulcer into the pericardium and another had perforation of an esophageal diverticulum into the mediastinum. Nineteen patients underwent primary repair of the perforation with cleansing and drainage of the mediastinum and the pleural cavity. The remaining 15 had primary extirpation of the thoracic esophagus, irrigation of the mediastinum with antibiotics, cervical esophagostomy, gastrostomy, and drainage of the mediastinum and pleural cavity. Nineteen of the 34 patients survived (hospital mortality 44%). Of patients with primary repair, only six survived (in- hospital mortality 68%), whereas only two patients treated with esophagectomy died (in-hospital mortality 13%). The difference was highly significant (p = 0.001). The most common cause of death was multiorgan failure resulting from sepsis. Postoperative complications developed in four patients treated with primary repair (two sepsis, one empyema, and one anuria) and in seven patients treated with esophagectomy (two empyema, two sepsis, one pneumonia, one mediastinal abscess, and one brain abscess). After healing of the mediastinitis, the esophagogastric continuity was reconstructed with colon in 11 patients and stomach in two patients. In the management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis, esophagectomy is superior to primary repair alone, which often leads to mediastinal leakage, continued sepsis, and death.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. K. Freeman, J. M. Van Woerkom, and A. J. Ascioti Esophageal Stent Placement for the Treatment of Iatrogenic Intrathoracic Esophageal Perforation Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2003 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Saarnio, H. Wiik, V. Koivukangas, T. Heikkinen, T. Juvonen, and F. Biancari A novel two-stage repair technique for the management of esophageal perforation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2007; 133(3): 840 - 841. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Linden, R. Bueno, S. J. Mentzer, L. Zellos, A. Lebenthal, Y. L. Colson, D. J. Sugarbaker, and M. T. Jaklitsch Modified T-Tube Repair of Delayed Esophageal Perforation Results in a Low Mortality Rate Similar to That Seen With Acute Perforations Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1129 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Brinster, S. Singhal, L. Lee, M. B. Marshall, L. R. Kaiser, and J. C. Kucharczuk Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1475 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Port, M. S. Kent, R. J. Korst, M. Bacchetta, and N. K. Altorki Thoracic esophageal perforations: a decade of experience Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1071 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Salo, J. K. Savola, V. J. Toikkanen, V. J. Perhoniemi, V. Y.O. Pettila, J. A. Klossner, and H. J. Toivonen Successful treatment of mediastinal gas gangrene due to esophageal perforation Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2000; 70(6): 2143 - 2145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A Odell The trauma patient - critical decision making - when to explore the chest? Trauma, April 1, 1999; 1(2): 125 - 131. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Engum, J. L. Grosfeld, K. W. West, F. J. Rescorla, L. R. T. Scherer, and W. G. Vaughan Improved Survival in Children With Esophageal Perforation Arch Surg, June 1, 1996; 131(6): 604 - 611. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. L. Bufkin, J. I. Miller Jr, and K. A. Mansour Esophageal Perforation: Emphasis on Management Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1996; 61(5): 1447 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				N. Wang, A. J. Razzouk, A. Safavi, K. Gan, G. S. Van Arsdell, P. M. Burton, B. L. Fandrich, M. J. Wood, A. C. Hill, E. E. Vyhmeister, et al. DELAYED PRIMARY REPAIR OF INTRATHORACIC ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION: IS IT SAFE? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1996; 111(1): 114 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. D. Wright, D. J. Mathisen, J. C. Wain, A. C. Moncure, A. D. Hilgenberg, and H. C. Grillo Reinforced Primary Repair of Thoracic Esophageal Perforation Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1995; 60(2): 245 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. H. Santos Late management of esophageal perforatio J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1994; 108(2): 392 - 393. [Full Text]