JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Donald D. Glower
W. Glenn Young
Walter G. Wolfe
James E. Lowe
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glower, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glower, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, J. E.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:381-0393
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.


Surgery for Acquired Heart Disease

Determinants of reoperation after 960 valve replacements with Carpentier-Edwards prostheses

Donald D. Glower, MD (by invitation), William D. White, MPH (by invitation), Angela C. Hatton, BA (by invitation), L. Richard Smith, PhD (by invitation), W. Glenn Young, MD, Walter G. Wolfe, MD, James E. Lowe, MD


Durham, N.C.

From the Departments of Surgery and Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C.

Address for reprints: Donald D. Glower, MD, Box 3851, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27704.

Abstract

During the period of 1977 to 1990, 960 Carpentier-Edwards standard prostheses (Baxter Healthcare Corp., Santa Ana, Calif.) were placed in 875 operations. Freedom from reoperation at 10 years was 57% ± 4%, 76% ± 3%, and 95% ± 5% for mitral, aortic, and tricuspid valve replacement, respectively. Age was the only independent determinant of reoperation for both aortic and mitral valves. Likelihood of reoperation decreased with age, with freedom from reoperation after 10 years in patients aged less than 60 years versus 60 or more years being 65% ± 5% versus 90% ± 4% after aortic valve replacement and 48% ± 5% versus 75% ± 6% after mitral valve replacement. For mitral valve replacement, larger valve size made reoperation more likely, with freedom from reoperation at 10 years being 71% ± 6% for sizes less than 31 mm and 57% ± 5% for sizes 31 mm or larger. For aortic valve replacement, prior median sternotomy reduced freedom from reoperation at 10 years from 80% ± 3% to 25% ± 5%. The low prevalence of reoperation affirms the suitability of the Carpentier-Edwards prosthesis for selected elderly patients and for tricuspid valve replacement. Because of their influence on the probability of reoperation, valve size and prior cardiac procedures also merit consideration in the choice of valvular prosthesis. (J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1994;107:381-93)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis
Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Stented Pericardial and Porcine Valves
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 857 - 894.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. Gudbjartsson, T. Absi, and S. Aranki
Mitral Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1031 - 1068.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. D. Potter, T. M. Sundt III, K. J. Zehr, J. A. Dearani, R. C. Daly, C. J. Mullany, C. G. A. McGregor, F. J. Puga, H. V. Schaff, and T. A. Orszulak
Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for failed mitral valve prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Ruel, A. Kulik, F. D. Rubens, P. Bedard, R. G. Masters, A. L. Pipe, and T. G. Mesana
Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 25(3): 364 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. J. Murday, A. Hochstitzky, J. Mansfield, J. Miles, B. Taylor, E. Whitley, and T. Treasure
A prospective controlled trial of st. jude versus starr edwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 66 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis
Stented Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 825 - 856.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. Gudbjartsson, S. Aranki, and L. H. Cohn
Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 951 - 986.
[Full Text]


Home page
HeartHome page
R Z Omar, L S Morton, D A Halliday, E M Danns, M T Beirne, W J Blot, and K M Taylor
Outlet strut fracture of Bjork-Shiley convexo concave heart valves: the UK cohort study
Heart, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 57 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
I. R.A. Goldsmith, T. J. Spyt, M. Boehm, S. Kendall, and M. D. Rosin
Midterm evaluation of the Tissuemed (Aspire) porcine bioprosthesis: 493 patients, 506 bioprostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71(5): 1471 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. S. Peterseim, Y.-Y. Cen, S. Cheruvu, K. Landolfo, T. M. Bashore, J. E. Lowe, W. G. Wolfe, and D. D. Glower
LONG-TERM OUTCOME AFTER BIOLOGIC VERSUS MECHANICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN 841 PATIENTS
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1999; 117(5): 890 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. P. Ratnatunga, M.-B. Edwards, C. J. Dore, and K. M. Taylor
Tricuspid valve replacement: UK heart valve registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1998; 66(6): 1940 - 1947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. W. Akins, M. J. Buckley, W. M. Daggett, A. D. Hilgenberg, G. J. Vlahakes, D. F. Torchiana, and J. C. Madsen
Risk of Reoperative Valve Replacement for Failed Mitral and Aortic Bioprostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1998; 65(6): 1545 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. C. Lucke, R. N. Samy, B. Z. Atkins, S. C. Silvestry, J. M. Douglas Jr, S. J. Schwab, W. G. Wolfe, and D. D. Glower
Results of Valve Replacement With Mechanical and Biological Prostheses in Chronic Renal Dialysis Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1997; 64(1): 129 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. I. Fann, D. C. Miller, KathleenA. Moore, R. S. Mitchell, P. E. Oyer, E. B. Stinson, R. C. Robbins, B. A. Reitz, and N. E. Shumway
Twenty-Year Clinical Experience With Porcine Bioprostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1996; 62(5): 1301 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G.-W. He, G. L. Grunkemeier, and A. Starr
Aortic Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients: Influence of Concomitant Coronary Grafting on Late Survival
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1996; 61(6): 1746 - 1751.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. F. Nistal, A. Hurle, J. A. Gutierrez, F. Mazorra, J. M. Revuelta, and w. t. t. a. o. M. Fernandez
Commissural dehiscence of Carpentier-Edwards mitral bioprostheses: Explant analysis and pathogenesis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1995; 110(3): 688 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.