|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:381-0393
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.
Surgery for Acquired Heart Disease |
Durham, N.C.
From the Departments of Surgery and Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C.
Address for reprints: Donald D. Glower, MD, Box 3851, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27704.
Abstract
During the period of 1977 to 1990, 960 Carpentier-Edwards standard prostheses (Baxter Healthcare Corp., Santa Ana, Calif.) were placed in 875 operations. Freedom from reoperation at 10 years was 57% ± 4%, 76% ± 3%, and 95% ± 5% for mitral, aortic, and tricuspid valve replacement, respectively. Age was the only independent determinant of reoperation for both aortic and mitral valves. Likelihood of reoperation decreased with age, with freedom from reoperation after 10 years in patients aged less than 60 years versus 60 or more years being 65% ± 5% versus 90% ± 4% after aortic valve replacement and 48% ± 5% versus 75% ± 6% after mitral valve replacement. For mitral valve replacement, larger valve size made reoperation more likely, with freedom from reoperation at 10 years being 71% ± 6% for sizes less than 31 mm and 57% ± 5% for sizes 31 mm or larger. For aortic valve replacement, prior median sternotomy reduced freedom from reoperation at 10 years from 80% ± 3% to 25% ± 5%. The low prevalence of reoperation affirms the suitability of the Carpentier-Edwards prosthesis for selected elderly patients and for tricuspid valve replacement. Because of their influence on the probability of reoperation, valve size and prior cardiac procedures also merit consideration in the choice of valvular prosthesis. (J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1994;107:381-93)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Stented Pericardial and Porcine Valves Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 857 - 894. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gudbjartsson, T. Absi, and S. Aranki Mitral Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1031 - 1068. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Potter, T. M. Sundt III, K. J. Zehr, J. A. Dearani, R. C. Daly, C. J. Mullany, C. G. A. McGregor, F. J. Puga, H. V. Schaff, and T. A. Orszulak Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for failed mitral valve prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 67 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ruel, A. Kulik, F. D. Rubens, P. Bedard, R. G. Masters, A. L. Pipe, and T. G. Mesana Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 25(3): 364 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Murday, A. Hochstitzky, J. Mansfield, J. Miles, B. Taylor, E. Whitley, and T. Treasure A prospective controlled trial of st. jude versus starr edwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 66 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis Stented Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 825 - 856. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gudbjartsson, S. Aranki, and L. H. Cohn Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 951 - 986. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R Z Omar, L S Morton, D A Halliday, E M Danns, M T Beirne, W J Blot, and K M Taylor Outlet strut fracture of Bjork-Shiley convexo concave heart valves: the UK cohort study Heart, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 57 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. R.A. Goldsmith, T. J. Spyt, M. Boehm, S. Kendall, and M. D. Rosin Midterm evaluation of the Tissuemed (Aspire) porcine bioprosthesis: 493 patients, 506 bioprostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71(5): 1471 - 1476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Peterseim, Y.-Y. Cen, S. Cheruvu, K. Landolfo, T. M. Bashore, J. E. Lowe, W. G. Wolfe, and D. D. Glower LONG-TERM OUTCOME AFTER BIOLOGIC VERSUS MECHANICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN 841 PATIENTS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1999; 117(5): 890 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Ratnatunga, M.-B. Edwards, C. J. Dore, and K. M. Taylor Tricuspid valve replacement: UK heart valve registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1998; 66(6): 1940 - 1947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Akins, M. J. Buckley, W. M. Daggett, A. D. Hilgenberg, G. J. Vlahakes, D. F. Torchiana, and J. C. Madsen Risk of Reoperative Valve Replacement for Failed Mitral and Aortic Bioprostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1998; 65(6): 1545 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Lucke, R. N. Samy, B. Z. Atkins, S. C. Silvestry, J. M. Douglas Jr, S. J. Schwab, W. G. Wolfe, and D. D. Glower Results of Valve Replacement With Mechanical and Biological Prostheses in Chronic Renal Dialysis Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1997; 64(1): 129 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. Fann, D. C. Miller, KathleenA. Moore, R. S. Mitchell, P. E. Oyer, E. B. Stinson, R. C. Robbins, B. A. Reitz, and N. E. Shumway Twenty-Year Clinical Experience With Porcine Bioprostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1996; 62(5): 1301 - 1311. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G.-W. He, G. L. Grunkemeier, and A. Starr Aortic Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients: Influence of Concomitant Coronary Grafting on Late Survival Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1996; 61(6): 1746 - 1751. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Nistal, A. Hurle, J. A. Gutierrez, F. Mazorra, J. M. Revuelta, and w. t. t. a. o. M. Fernandez Commissural dehiscence of Carpentier-Edwards mitral bioprostheses: Explant analysis and pathogenesis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1995; 110(3): 688 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |