|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:57-62
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.
SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE |
Rome, Italy
From the Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Received for publication June 28, 1993. Accepted for publication Oct. 17, 1993. Address for reprints: Ruggero De Paulis, MD, Cattedra di Cardiochirurgia, Universita di Roma, Tor Vergata, European Hospital, via Portuense 694, 00149 Roma, Italy.
Abstract
A Doppler echocardiographic study was performed to evaluate the hemodynamic performances of small diameter CarboMedics aortic valves (CarboMedics, Inc., Austin, Tex.) in patients with a mismatch between the prosthetic valve and body surface area. Fourteen patients receiving either a 19 mm (n= 7) or a 21 mm valve (n= 7) prosthesis were studied. Only patients with a body surface area greater than 1.65 m2were included in the study. Pulsed and continuous wave Doppler echocardiography was performed at rest and 2 minutes after treadmill exercise with the Bruce protocol. Peak and mean gradients across the valve prosthesis were estimated; effective orifice area, performance index, and discharge coefficient of the valve prosthesis were calculated. All patients achieved a significant increase in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and cardiac output with exercise. Mean gradients ± standard deviation of the mean at rest and 2 minutes after exercise were 20.1 ± 7.1 mm Hg and 21.8 ± 9 mm Hg for the 19 mm prosthesis and 12.3 ± 3.4 mm Hg and 15.9 ± 3.9 mm Hg for the 21 mm prosthesis. The 19 mm valve prosthesis significantly increased the effective orifice area with exercise (1.02 ± 0.2 versus 1.20 ± 0.3; p< 0.05), whereas it was almost unmodified for the 21 mm valve (1.38 ± 0.2 versus 1.39 ± 0.3; p= not significant). Therefore, despite a similar increase in cardiac output with exercise, only the 21 mm valve prosthesis showed a significant increase in peak (25.4 ± 5.2 versus 34.9 ± 8.1 mm Hg) and mean gradient (p< 0.01). We conclude that small diameter CarboMedics valves have satisfactory hemodynamic performances even after strenuous exercise in patients with large body surface areas. The hemodynamic performances of the 19 mm valve prosthesis seem to be optimized with exercise. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1994;108:57-62)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Chambers, J. Roxburgh, C. Blauth, J. O'Riordan, F. Hodson, and H. Rimington A randomized comparison of the MCRI On-X and CarboMedics Top Hat bileaflet mechanical replacement aortic valves: Early postoperative hemodynamic function and clinical events J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2005; 130(3): 759 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Niinami, S. Aomi, H. Tomioka, K. Nakano, and H. Koyanagi A comparison of the in vivo performance of the 19-mm St. Jude medical hemodynamic plus and 21-mm standard valve Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): 1120 - 1124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Vitale, I. Caldarera, C. Muneretto, R. Sinatra, A. Scafuri, E. Di Rosa, A. Contini, N. Tedesco, A. Pierangeli, M. Abbate, et al. Clinical evaluation of St Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus versus standard aortic valve prostheses: The Italian multicenter, prospective, randomized study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2001; 122(4): 691 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Girard, F. A. Miller Jr., T. A. Orszulak, C. J. Mullany, S. Montgomery, W. D. Edwards, H. D. Tazelaar, J. F. Malouf, and A. J. Tajik Reoperation for prosthetic aortic valve obstruction in the era of echocardiography: trends in diagnostic testing and comparison with surgical findings J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2001; 37(2): 579 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Takakura, T. Sasaki, K. Hashimoto, T. Hachiya, K. Onoguchi, M. Oshiumi, and S. Takeuchi Hemodynamic evaluation of 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 609 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pibarot and J. G. Dumesnil Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1131 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Maslow, J. M. Haering, S. Heindel, J. Mashikian, R. Levine, and P. Douglas An Evaluation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Using Transesophageal Echocardiography: The Double-Envelope Technique Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 509 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J R Gonzalez-Juanatey, M V Fernandez, F G Sampedro, J M Garcia-Acuna, J B Garcia-Bengoechea, A A Cendon, and M G de la Pena Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprostheses and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 149 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Bernal, R. Martin-Duran, J. M. Rabasa, and J. M. Revuelta The CarboMedics ""Top-Hat"" supraannular prosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1999; 67(5): 1299 - 1303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vijayanagar, G. Chan, R. Musunuru, N. Sastry, I. Siegman, N. Rattehalli, and M. Cortelli Aortic Valve Replacement Without Annular Enlargement in Patients with Small Aortic Roots Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 1998; 6(4): 279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Cam, H. Gercekoglu, S. Celik, M. Gursurer, G. Tayyareci, H. Karabulut, A. Narin, T. Tezel, and B. Yigiter Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 166 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Gonzalez-Juanatey Assessment of the hemodynamic performance of small-size aortic valve prostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1997; 113(6): 1122 - 1123. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. De Paulis, L. Sommariva, G. M. De Matteis, E. Caprara, F. Tomai, A. P. de Peppo, P. Polisca, C. Bassano, and L. Chiariello EXTENT AND PATTERN OF REGRESSION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL SIZE CARBOMEDICS AORTIC VALVES J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1997; 113(5): 901 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. McDonald, R. C. Daly, H. V. Schaff, C. J. Mullany, F. A. Miller, J. J. Morris, and T. A. Orszulak Hemodynamic Performance of Small Aortic Valve Bioprostheses: Is There a Difference? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 362 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Carrel, U. Zingg, R. Jenni, B. Aeschbacher, and M. I. Turina Early In Vivo Experience With the Hemodynamic Plus St. Jude Medical Heart Valves in Patients With Narrowed Aortic Annulus Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1996; 61(5): 1418 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Izzat, I. Birdi, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCES OF ST. JUDE MEDICAL AND CARBOMEDICS 21 MM AORTIC PROSTHESES BY MEANS OF DOBUTAMINE STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1996; 111(2): 408 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Izzat, M. Caputo, and G. D. Angelini Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Stentless Porcine Aortic Valves Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1995; 60(5): 1461 - 1461. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Izzat, I. Birdi, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Small CarboMedics Aortic Prostheses Using Dobutamine-Stress Doppler Echocardiography Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1995; 60(4): 1048 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |