JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ruggero De Paulis
Luigi Chiariello
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Paulis, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chiariello, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Paulis, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chiariello, L.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:57-62
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.


SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE

Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic anulus and valve prosthesis–body surface area mismatch

Ruggero De Paulis, MD, Luigi Sommariva, MD, Fabrizio Russo, MD, Fabrizio Tomai, MD, Antonio Tondo, MD, Carlo Pagliaricci, MD, Carlo Bassano, MD, Luigi Chiariello, MD


Rome, Italy

From the Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Received for publication June 28, 1993. Accepted for publication Oct. 17, 1993. Address for reprints: Ruggero De Paulis, MD, Cattedra di Cardiochirurgia, Universita di Roma, Tor Vergata, European Hospital, via Portuense 694, 00149 Roma, Italy.

Abstract

A Doppler echocardiographic study was performed to evaluate the hemodynamic performances of small diameter CarboMedics aortic valves (CarboMedics, Inc., Austin, Tex.) in patients with a mismatch between the prosthetic valve and body surface area. Fourteen patients receiving either a 19 mm (n= 7) or a 21 mm valve (n= 7) prosthesis were studied. Only patients with a body surface area greater than 1.65 m2were included in the study. Pulsed and continuous wave Doppler echocardiography was performed at rest and 2 minutes after treadmill exercise with the Bruce protocol. Peak and mean gradients across the valve prosthesis were estimated; effective orifice area, performance index, and discharge coefficient of the valve prosthesis were calculated. All patients achieved a significant increase in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and cardiac output with exercise. Mean gradients ± standard deviation of the mean at rest and 2 minutes after exercise were 20.1 ± 7.1 mm Hg and 21.8 ± 9 mm Hg for the 19 mm prosthesis and 12.3 ± 3.4 mm Hg and 15.9 ± 3.9 mm Hg for the 21 mm prosthesis. The 19 mm valve prosthesis significantly increased the effective orifice area with exercise (1.02 ± 0.2 versus 1.20 ± 0.3; p< 0.05), whereas it was almost unmodified for the 21 mm valve (1.38 ± 0.2 versus 1.39 ± 0.3; p= not significant). Therefore, despite a similar increase in cardiac output with exercise, only the 21 mm valve prosthesis showed a significant increase in peak (25.4 ± 5.2 versus 34.9 ± 8.1 mm Hg) and mean gradient (p< 0.01). We conclude that small diameter CarboMedics valves have satisfactory hemodynamic performances even after strenuous exercise in patients with large body surface areas. The hemodynamic performances of the 19 mm valve prosthesis seem to be optimized with exercise. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1994;108:57-62)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. Chambers, J. Roxburgh, C. Blauth, J. O'Riordan, F. Hodson, and H. Rimington
A randomized comparison of the MCRI On-X and CarboMedics Top Hat bileaflet mechanical replacement aortic valves: Early postoperative hemodynamic function and clinical events
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2005; 130(3): 759 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Niinami, S. Aomi, H. Tomioka, K. Nakano, and H. Koyanagi
A comparison of the in vivo performance of the 19-mm St. Jude medical hemodynamic plus and 21-mm standard valve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): 1120 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. Vitale, I. Caldarera, C. Muneretto, R. Sinatra, A. Scafuri, E. Di Rosa, A. Contini, N. Tedesco, A. Pierangeli, M. Abbate, et al.
Clinical evaluation of St Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus versus standard aortic valve prostheses: The Italian multicenter, prospective, randomized study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2001; 122(4): 691 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. E. Girard, F. A. Miller Jr., T. A. Orszulak, C. J. Mullany, S. Montgomery, W. D. Edwards, H. D. Tazelaar, J. F. Malouf, and A. J. Tajik
Reoperation for prosthetic aortic valve obstruction in the era of echocardiography: trends in diagnostic testing and comparison with surgical findings
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2001; 37(2): 579 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Takakura, T. Sasaki, K. Hashimoto, T. Hachiya, K. Onoguchi, M. Oshiumi, and S. Takeuchi
Hemodynamic evaluation of 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 609 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Pibarot and J. G. Dumesnil
Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1131 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. D. Maslow, J. M. Haering, S. Heindel, J. Mashikian, R. Levine, and P. Douglas
An Evaluation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Using Transesophageal Echocardiography: The Double-Envelope Technique
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J R Gonzalez-Juanatey, M V Fernandez, F G Sampedro, J M Garcia-Acuna, J B Garcia-Bengoechea, A A Cendon, and M G de la Pena
Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprostheses and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots
Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 149 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. M. Bernal, R. Martin-Duran, J. M. Rabasa, and J. M. Revuelta
The CarboMedics ""Top-Hat"" supraannular prosthesis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1999; 67(5): 1299 - 1303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
R. Vijayanagar, G. Chan, R. Musunuru, N. Sastry, I. Siegman, N. Rattehalli, and M. Cortelli
Aortic Valve Replacement Without Annular Enlargement in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 1998; 6(4): 279 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
N. Cam, H. Gercekoglu, S. Celik, M. Gursurer, G. Tayyareci, H. Karabulut, A. Narin, T. Tezel, and B. Yigiter
Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 166 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. R. Gonzalez-Juanatey
Assessment of the hemodynamic performance of small-size aortic valve prostheses
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1997; 113(6): 1122 - 1123.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. De Paulis, L. Sommariva, G. M. De Matteis, E. Caprara, F. Tomai, A. P. de Peppo, P. Polisca, C. Bassano, and L. Chiariello
EXTENT AND PATTERN OF REGRESSION OF LEFT VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL SIZE CARBOMEDICS AORTIC VALVES
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1997; 113(5): 901 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. L. McDonald, R. C. Daly, H. V. Schaff, C. J. Mullany, F. A. Miller, J. J. Morris, and T. A. Orszulak
Hemodynamic Performance of Small Aortic Valve Bioprostheses: Is There a Difference?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 362 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Carrel, U. Zingg, R. Jenni, B. Aeschbacher, and M. I. Turina
Early In Vivo Experience With the Hemodynamic Plus St. Jude Medical Heart Valves in Patients With Narrowed Aortic Annulus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1996; 61(5): 1418 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, I. Birdi, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCES OF ST. JUDE MEDICAL AND CARBOMEDICS 21 MM AORTIC PROSTHESES BY MEANS OF DOBUTAMINE STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1996; 111(2): 408 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, M. Caputo, and G. D. Angelini
Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Stentless Porcine Aortic Valves
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1995; 60(5): 1461 - 1461.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. B. Izzat, I. Birdi, P. Wilde, A. J. Bryan, and G. D. Angelini
Evaluation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Small CarboMedics Aortic Prostheses Using Dobutamine-Stress Doppler Echocardiography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1995; 60(4): 1048 - 1052.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.