JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Richard A. Moggio
Richard W. Pooley
Mohan R. Sarabu
George E. Reed
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moggio, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reed, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moggio, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reed, G. E.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:215-220
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.


SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE

Experience with the Mitroflow aortic bioprosthesis

Richard A. Moggio, MD, Richard W. Pooley, MD, Mohan R. Sarabu, MD, Joseph Christiana, BS, Allan W. Ho, BS, MPH, George E. Reed, MD


Valhalla, N.Y.

From the Westchester County Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, N.Y.

Received for publication June 17, 1993. Accepted for publication Dec. 14, 1993. Address for reprints: Richard A. Moggio, MD, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westchester County Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595.

Abstract

From October 1985 to May 1990, the Mitroflow bovine pericardial valve was placed in the aortic position in 168 patients (97 men, 71 women) with a mean age of 69.7 years. Eighty-nine patients had isolated aortic valve replacement, and 79 had aortic valve replacement and additional procedures. Follow-up over 71/2 years includes 781 patient years (426 for isolated aortic valve replacement). Mean follow-up time is 56 months. Peak-to-peak gradients (in millimeters of mercury) measured in the intraoperative period averaged 11.0 ± 8.7, 11.8 ± 10.8, and 8.6 ± 8.2 for 19 mm, 21 mm, and 23 mm valves, respectively. Hospital mortality was 7.3% (14 patients); all deaths were non-valve related. Late mortality of 20.1% in 31 patients resulted from cardiac failure (n = 8), sepsis (n = 4), valve reoperation (n = 1), non-cardiac causes (n = 15) and sudden, unknown causes (n = 3). Fifteen thromboembolic episodes occurred, but only three late thromboembolic episodes occurred in isolated aortic valve replacement without other risk factors. Four early and four late episodes of endocarditis occurred. Seven patients had clinical valve dysfunction, and five others required reoperation for structural deterioration, with one death. At 94 months, overall survival was 64% ± 5%. Freedom from thromboembolic episode was 87% ± 3% and 90% ± 4% for isolated aortic valve replacement. Freedom from combined reoperation or clinical dysfunction was 75% ± 8%: 64% ± 15% for those under 70 years of age, and 87% ± 7% for those 70 years of age and older. The valve has favorable hemodynamics. Durability begins to decline during the sixth year after implantation, possibly at a slower rate in patients older than 70 years of age. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1994;108:215-20)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. A. Yankah, M. Pasic, M. Musci, J. Stein, C. Detschades, H. Siniawski, and R. Hetzer
Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: Durability results up to 21 years
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2008; 136(3): 688 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Minami, A. Zittermann, S. Schulte-Eistrup, H. Koertke, and R. Korfer
Mitroflow Synergy Prostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: 19 Years Experience With 1,516 Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1699 - 1705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. D. Potter, T. M. Sundt III, K. J. Zehr, J. A. Dearani, R. C. Daly, C. J. Mullany, C. G. A. McGregor, F. J. Puga, H. V. Schaff, and T. A. Orszulak
Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for failed mitral valve prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. J. Murday, A. Hochstitzky, J. Mansfield, J. Miles, B. Taylor, E. Whitley, and T. Treasure
A prospective controlled trial of st. jude versus starr edwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 66 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. Ninet, F. Tronc, J. Robin, A. Curtil, I. Aleksic, and G. Champsaur
Mechanical versus biological isolated aortic valvular replacement after the age of 70: equivalent long-term results
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1998; 13(1): 84 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.