JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Barbara L. Robinson
James W. Davis
James J. Morris
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, K.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, K.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. J.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:477-486
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.


CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS,
MYOCARDIAL MANAGEMENT, AND SUPPORT TECHNIQUES

The effects of left heart assist on right ventricular muscle mechanics and ventricular coupling in the injured heart

Kunio Fujita, MD, Gerald E. McGrath, BS, Terumasa Morita, MD, Barbara L. Robinson, MD, James W. Davis, MSEE, James J. Morris, MD


Rochester, Minn.

From the Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minn.

Received for publication Aug. 10, 1993. Accepted for publication Feb. 4, 1994. Address for reprints: James J. Morris, MD, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. S.W. Rochester, MN 55905.

Abstract

So that we could better characterize the effects of left heart assist on right ventricular myocardial muscle mechanics and ventricular mechanical coupling in the injured heart, nine dogs underwent 30 minutes of global cardiac ischemia supported by cardiopulmonary bypass followed by randomly varied levels of left heart assist at 0, 1.0, and 2.0 L/min (0, 37 ± 4, and 74 ± 7 ml/kg per minute). A centrifugal pump with left ventricle-to-aorta bypass was used with the intent to cause left ventricular volume unloading but without complete left ventricular pressure unloading. Right ventricular regional free wall and septal–free wall dimensions were measured by a sonomicrometer and right ventricular pressure by a micromanometer. Pressure and dimension data were acquired over a range of preloads produced by transient vena caval occlusion and at steady state at an initial control point and after ischemia at each level of left heart assist. Right ventricular regional early diastolic function was assessed by percent segmental relaxation during the first third of diastole, end-diastolic compliance by the end-diastolic pressure-dimension relationship, systolic contractile performance by the slope (Mw) and dimension axis intercept (Lw) of the linear preload recruitable stroke work relationship, and right ventricular isovolumic relaxation by the pressure decay time constant. Ischemia reduced Mwof both the free wall (38.3 ± 16.1 to 16.4 ± 4.2 erg·cm -3·103, p< 0.01) and septal free wall (30.2 ± 12.7 to 13.4 ± 4.9 erg·cm-3·103, p< 0.01) and shifted Lwrightward (1.3 ± 0.3 to 1.4 ± 0.3 mm, p< 0.01, and 2.8 ± 0.8 to 3.0 ± 0.9 mm, p< 0.01), which confirmed myocardial ischemic injury. There were no effects of left heart assist on free wall or septal–free wall systolic contractile performance assessed by Mwand Lwor on early diastolic relaxation assessed by percent segmental relaxation during the first third of diastole in either right ventricular region (all p= not significant). There were also no observed characteristic alterations of free wall or septal–free wall end-diastolic pressure-dimension relationships with left heart assist. The pressure decay time constant decreased with increasing levels of left heart assist (51 ± 14, 49 ± 16, and 43 ± 11 msec, p< 0.05), which indicated an improvement in right ventricular isovolumic relaxation attributable to left heart assist. These data demonstrate that mechanical ventricular interactive effects during left heart assist are beneficial, but limited to isovolumic relaxation in the injured heart. The likely optimal method of left heart assist for postcardiotomy support should sufficiently augment cardiac output and arterial pressure but maintain left ventricular systolic pressure generation to preserve beneficial ventricular mechanical coupling. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1994;108:477-86)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.