JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lockie, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Watterson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lockie, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Watterson, K.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:1037-1042
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.


SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE

Biomechanics of glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic roots and valvesAn investigation of the effect of predilation of the elastic aortic root

K. J. Lockie, BEng, PhD, J. Fisher, BSc, PhD, N. P. Juster, BSc, PhD, G. A. Davies, FRCS, K. Watterson, FRCS


Leeds, United Kingdom

Supported by Heart Research, Leeds, United Kingdom

Received for publication Nov. 19, 1993. Accepted for publication Mar. 16, 1994. Address for reprints: Professor John Fisher, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.

Abstract

The biomechanics and function of fresh porcine aortic roots and valves have been compared with those of glutaraldehyde-treated roots prepared in a conventional manner without dilation of the elastic aortic root and with glutaraldehyde-treated roots prepared with permanent predilation during fixation. The glutaraldehyde-treated aortic walls were significantly less extensible than fresh walls, with a mean dilation of only 6% compared with 45% for the fresh root at 120 mm Hg pressure. Permanent predilation of the aortic root during fixation allowed the total dilation of the fixed root to be increased to 19% at 120 mm Hg pressure. The effective orifice area of the fresh root and valve was significantly greater than those of the fixed roots and valves, with permanent predilation fixation producing a significantly greater orifice area than conventional fixation. The open-leaflet bending deformations were found to be lower in the valves fixed after permanent predilation than in the standard fixed valves. The glutaraldehyde-treated porcine root and valve does not reproduce the biomechanics and function of the fresh root, because of the reduced extensibility of the fixed aortic wall. Permanent predilation during fixation helps to partially overcome the shortcomings of the fixed root, producing better function than a standard fixed valve. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1994;108:1037-42)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. J. Fradet, N. Bleese, J. Burgess, and P. C. Cartier
Mosaic valve international clinical trial: early performance results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S273 - S277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. P. Wong, M. E. Legget, S. C. Greaves, B. G. Barratt-Boyes, F. P. Milsom, and P. J. Raudkivi
Early experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis: a new generation porcine valve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2000; 69(6): 1846 - 1850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
B. G. Barratt-Boyes, W. M. Jaffe, and R. M. Whitlock
THE MEDTRONIC INTACT* PORCINE VALVE: TEN-YEAR CLINICAL REVIEW
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1998; 116(6): 1005 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.