JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Lester R. Sauvage
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sauvage, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sauvage, L. R.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:504-510
© 1995 Mosby, Inc.


SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE

COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF MONOPOLAR AND BIPOLAR CAUTERIZATION ON SKELETONIZED, DISSECTED INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERIES

Hiroki Yoshida, MD, Moses Hong-De Wu, MD, Yasuhiro Kouchi, MD, Yoko Onuki, MD, Qun Shi, MD, Lester R. Sauvage, MD


Seattle, Wash.

From The Hope Heart Institute, the Providence Medical Center, and the Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash.

Received for publication Sept. 2, 1994. Accepted for publication Dec. 28, 1994. Address for reprints: Lester R. Sauvage, MD, 528 18th Ave., Seattle, WA 98122.

Abstract

The internal thoracic artery is preferable to the saphenous vein for use as a conduit for coronary artery bypass. More extensive use is possible if this artery is mobilized in a skeletonized form to provide greater length. Internal thoracic arteries are usually mobilized with cauterization. This study compared the effectiveness and effects on neighboring areas of division of the branches of the canine internal thoracic artery with bipolar cauterization and monopolar cauterization. Branch closure was significantly more secure in the bipolar cauterization group, with bleeding in 25 (9%) of 279 branches of 15 internal thoracic arteries treated with monopolar cauterization, in contrast to bleeding in 4 (1.3%) of 306 branches in the 15 internal thoracic arteries treated with bipolar cauterization, which were paired with the group treated with monopolar cauterization. The group of internal thoracic arteries treated with monopolar cauterization had a significantly higher prevalence of leakage when luminal pressure was increased from 120 to 160 mm Hg. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated partial loss of endothelial cells on the flow surface of internal thoracic arteries treated with bipolar cauterization, compared with almost complete loss of endothelial cells around the orificial areas after monopolar cauterization. Secondary bipolar cauterization treatment caused only slightly more damage than primary treatment, but secondary monopolar cauterization was much more severe and extensive than primary treatment. These data suggest that bipolar cauterization is preferable to monopolar cauterization for skeletonized dissection of the internal thoracic artery. (J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1995;110:504-10)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. Onorati, A. Esposito, F. Pezzo, A. di Virgilio, P. Mastroroberto, and A. Renzulli
Hospital Outcome Analysis After Different Techniques of Left Internal Mammary Grafts Harvesting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 1912 - 1919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. A. Vassiliades Jr, N. Cosgriff, A. Denham, J. Olson, and D. H. Maul
Superiority of Using Bipolar Radiofrequency Energy for Internal Mammary Artery Harvesting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1508 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Athanasiou, M.-C. Crossman, G. Asimakopoulos, A. Cherian, A. Weerasinghe, B. Glenville, and R. Casula
Should the internal thoracic artery be skeletonized?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 2238 - 2246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
S.-M. Huang, N.-H. Chow, H.-L. Lee, and T.-J. Wu
The Value of Color Flow Doppler Ultrasonography of the Superior Thyroid Artery in the Surgical Management of Graves Disease
Arch Surg, February 1, 2003; 138(2): 146 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Jeanmart, L. P. Perrault, N. Desjardins, O. Chavanon, M. Carrier, and J. D. Fonger
Arterial balloon catheter: a new atraumatic device for dilating arterial grafts
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): 810 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. A. Deja, S. Wos, K. S. Golba, P. Zurek, W. Domaradzki, R. Bachowski, and T. J. Spyt
Intraoperative and laboratory evaluation of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1999; 68(6): 2164 - 2168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. D. Crouch, D. P. O’Hair, J. P. Keuler, T. P. Barragry, P. H. Werner, and L. H. Kleinman
Open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: wound complications and vein quality
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 68(4): 1513 - 1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Sasajima, M. H.-D. Wu, Q. Shi, N. Hayashida, and L. R. Sauvage
Effect of Skeletonizing Dissection on the Internal Thoracic Artery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1998; 65(4): 1009 - 1013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. M. Cunningham
Skeletonization of internal thoracic artery grafts
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1996; 111(2): 489 - 490.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.