JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Delos M. Cosgrove
Bruce W. Lytle
Paul C. Taylor
Robert W. Stewart
Patrick M. McCarthy
Floyd D. Loop
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Loop, F. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Loop, F. D.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:651-0662
© 1995 Mosby, Inc.


SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE

The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: Ten-year results

Delos M. Cosgrove, MDa, Bruce W. Lytle, MDa (by invitation), Paul C. Taylor, MDa (by invitation), Margarita T. Camacho, MDa (by invitation), Robert W. Stewart, MDa (by invitation), Patrick M. McCarthy, MDa (by invitation), Dave P. Miller, MSb (by invitation), Marion R. Piedmonte, MAb (by invitation), Floyd D. Loop, MDa

Cleveland, Ohio

Address for reprints: Delos M. Cosgrove, MD, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195.

Abstract

To evaluate the function of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position, we analyzed the results of 310 aortic valve replacements performed between 1982 and 1985. Mean age was 64.2±10.8 years (range 22 to 95 years); 190 patients (61.3%) were male patients. There were 18 hospital deaths (5.8%), and none were valve related. Follow-up of the 292 survivors was 100% complete at a mean of 7.8±2.9 years; 2290 patient-years of follow-up were available for analysis. There were 133 late deaths (45.5%). Actuarial survivals at 5 and 10 years were 82.5% and 45.9%, respectively. The 10-year actuarial freedom from events was 88.7%±2.1% for thromboembolism, 90.9%±1.8% for hemorrhage, 94.3%±1.6% for endocarditis, and 91.2%±2.6% for structural deterioration. The 153 hospital survivors 65 years of age or older had an extremely low incidence of structural valve deterioration, with only four explants and 95.5% actuarial freedom from explantation at 10 years, and a linearized rate of 0.3±0.2 per patient-year compared with 88.6% and 0.7±0.2 for patients younger than 65 years of age. Twelve valves were explanted for structural deterioration. Of these, 11 (93%) had leaflet calcification causing stenosis and one had a wear-related leaflet tear. The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve has a low incidence of valve-related complications. The freedom from structural valve deterioration is low at 10 years, particularly in patients 65 years of age and older. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1995;110: 651-62)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
2006 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, et al.
2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Circulation, October 7, 2008; 118(15): e523 - e661.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): e1 - e142.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. Hayashida, K. Kanda, H. Yaku, J. Ando, and Y. Nakayama
Development of an in vivo tissue-engineered, autologous heart valve (the biovalve): Preparation of a prototype model
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 152 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
K. Prasongsukarn, W. E. Jamieson, E. Germann, F. Chan, and S. V Lichtenstein
Aortic and Mitral Prosthetic Valve Replacement in Age Groups 61 65 & 66 70 Years
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2007; 15(2): 127 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Kulik, P. Bedard, B-K. Lam, F. D. Rubens, P. J. Hendry, R. G. Masters, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel
Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 30(3): 485 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 598 - 675.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Sakamoto, K. Hashimoto, H. Okuyama, H. Takakura, S. Ishii, S. Taguchi, and H. Kagawa
Prevalence and Avoidance of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch in Aortic Valve Replacement in Small Adults
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1305 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. W. Akins, A. D. Hilgenberg, G. J. Vlahakes, J. C. Madsen, T. E. MacGillivray, G. M. LaMuraglia, and R. P. Cambria
Late Results of Combined Carotid and Coronary Surgery Using Actual Versus Actuarial Methodology
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2091 - 2097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. G. Masters, M. Haddad, A. L. Pipe, J. P. Veinot, and T. Mesana
Clinical outcomes with the Hancock II bioprosthetic valve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 78(3): 832 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Gao, Y. Wu, G. L. Grunkemeier, A. P. Furnary, and A. Starr
Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 384 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. W. Jamieson and M. M. Madani
The choice of valve protheses
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 389 - 390.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Vitale, S. C. Clark, A. Ramsden, A. Hasan, C. J. Hilton, and M. P. Holden
Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of small perimount aortic valves in patients aged 75 years or older
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 35 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. K. Banbury, D. M. Cosgrove III, J. D. Thomas, E. H. Blackstone, J. Rajeswaran, J. E. Okies, and R. M. Frater
Hemodynamic stability during 17 years of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1460 - 1465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. Machida, H. Ishibashi-Ueda, K. Nakano, Y. Sasako, J. Kobayashi, K. Bando, K. Minatoya, H. Imamura, and S. Kitamura
A morphologic study of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts in the mitral position exhibiting primary tissue failure in adults in comparison with Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2001; 122(4): 649 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Carrier, M. Pellerin, L. P. Perrault, P. Page, Y. Hebert, R. Cartier, I. Dyrda, and L. C. Pelletier
Aortic valve replacement with mechanical and biologic prostheses in middle-aged patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S253 - S256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Takakura, T. Sasaki, K. Hashimoto, T. Hachiya, K. Onoguchi, M. Oshiumi, and S. Takeuchi
Hemodynamic evaluation of 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 609 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Westaby, M. Horton, X. Y. Jin, T. Katsumata, O. Ahmed, S. Saito, H.-H. Li, and G. L. Grunkemeier
Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 70(3): 785 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
C.-A Mestres, F J. Garcia-Real, M. Fuentes, C.-A Mestres, F J. Garcia-Real, and M. Fuentes
Early Postoperative Thrombosis of Pericardial Xenograft Aortic Valve
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2000; 8(1): 50 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. G. Svensson, J. Longoria, W. A. Kimmel, and E. Nadolny
Management of aortic valve disease during aortic surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 69(3): 778 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
W. R. Eric Jamieson, M. A. Marchand, C. L. Pelletier, R. Norton, M. Pellerin, T. W. Dubiel, M. R. Aupart, W. J. Daenen, M. P. Holden, T. E. David, et al.
STRUCTURAL VALVE DETERIORATION IN MITRAL REPLACEMENT SURGERY: COMPARISON OF CARPENTIER-EDWARDS SUPRA-ANNULAR PORCINE AND PERIMOUNT PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESES
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1999; 118(2): 297 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. D. Kon, A. R. Cordell, S. M. Adair, J. E. Dobbins, and D. W. Kitzman
Aortic root replacement with the freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 67(6): 1609 - 1615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
B. G. Barratt-Boyes, W. M. Jaffe, and R. M. Whitlock
THE MEDTRONIC INTACT* PORCINE VALVE: TEN-YEAR CLINICAL REVIEW
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1998; 116(6): 1005 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. E. David, R. Puschmann, J. Ivanov, J. Bos, S. Armstrong, C. M. Feindel, and H. E. Scully
Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: a case-match study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1998; 116(2): 236 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. E. Sommers and T. E. David
Aortic Valve Replacement With Patch Enlargement of the Aortic Annulus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1997; 63(6): 1608 - 1612.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. L. McDonald, R. C. Daly, H. V. Schaff, C. J. Mullany, F. A. Miller, J. J. Morris, and T. A. Orszulak
Hemodynamic Performance of Small Aortic Valve Bioprostheses: Is There a Difference?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 362 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Abolhoda, S. Yu, J. R. Oyarzun, K. R. Allen, J. R. McCormick, S. Han, F. W. Kemp, J. D. Bogden, Q. Lu, and S. Gabbay
No-React Detoxification Process: A Superior Anticalcification Method for Bioprostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1996; 62(6): 1724 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.