JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nanas, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Moulopoulos, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nanas, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Moulopoulos, S. D.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:55-61
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.


CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS,
MYOCARDIAL MANAGEMENT, AND SUPPORT TECHNIQUES

A VAVLELESS HIGH STROKE VOLUME COUNTERPULSATION DEVICE RESTORES HEMODYNAMICS IN PATIENTS WITH CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE AND INTRACTABLE CARDIOGENIC SHOCK AWAITING HEART TRANSPLANTATION

John N. Nanas, MDa, Christos T. Lolas, MDb, Christos E. Charitos, MDb, Serafim N. Nanas, MDa, Zafiria J. Margari, MDa, Emmanuel V. Agapitos, a, Spyridon D. Moulopoulos, MDa


Athens, Greece

Received for publication Dec. 27, 1994. Accepted for publication March 16, 1995. Address for reprints: John N. Nanas, MD, University of Athens School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, "Alexandra" Hospital, Vas. Sofias Ave. and 2 K. Lourou St., GR: 115 28, Athens, Greece.

Abstract

The paraaortic counterpulsation device is a round pumping chamber with one valveless opening 20 mm in diameter and a 100 ml stroke volume. The paraaortic counterpulsation device was implanted on the ascending aorta of three male patients with intractable cardiogenic shock. Patients were assisted for 4 hours and 8 and 54 days, respectively; the first patient died as a result of nonresponding peripheral vasodilation and the other two died of septic shock. The two patients who were assisted for 8 and 54 days were conscious and able to function in a limited manner during the mechanical assistance. Discontinuation of the mechanical support for a few seconds was followed by low systolic arterial pressure (30 to 60 mm Hg) and syncopal episodes. Biochemical tests and autopsy results in these patients showed no evidence of blood cell destruction, thrombus formation, brain infarction, or other distal emboli. In conclusion, satisfactory hemodynamic effects, excellent biocompatibility, and simplicity of the implantation procedure in these patients encourage the use of the paraaortic counterpulsation device as a bridge to heart transplantation. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1996;111:55-61)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. Utoh
A history of the valveless paraaortic counterpulsation device
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1996; 112(3): 850 - 851.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1996 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.