|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:356-363
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.
GENERAL THORACIC SURGERY |
Supported in part by a Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development Investigator Initiated Research grant No. 91-074.2.
Received for publication Sept. 12, 1995 Revisions requested Oct. 24, 1995; revisions received Nov. 16, 1995 Accepted for publication Nov. 21, 1995. Address for reprints: Katherine S. Virgo, PhD, Health Services Research, Department of Surgery, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, 3635 Vista Ave., P.O. Box 15250, St. Louis, MO 63110-0250.
Abstract
The two objectives of this study were to determine the range of recommended follow-up strategies for patients with lung cancer treated with curative intent and to estimate the cost of such follow-up. Ten articles delineating eight specific follow-up strategies were identified from a Medline search of the literature for 1980 through 1995. An economic analysis was done of the costs associated with the identified strategies. Charge data obtained from the Part B Medicare Annual Data file and the Hospital Outpatient Bill file were used as a proxy for cost. Follow-up intensity varied widely across strategies for 5 years of posttreatment follow-up. Medicare-allowed charges for 5-year follow-up ranged from a low of $946 to a high of $5645. When Medicare-allowed charges were converted to a proxy for actual charges by a conversion ratio of 1.62, the range was $1533 to $9145, a fivefold difference in charges. There was no indication that more intensive, higher-cost strategies increased survival or quality of life. The published literature, including textbooks, holds few answers in this area. (J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1996;112:356-63)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Rubins, M. Unger, and G. L. Colice Follow-up and Surveillance of the Lung Cancer Patient Following Curative Intent Therapy: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 355S - 367S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Earle Outcomes Research in Lung Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 56 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Chiu, M.-S. Chern, M.-H. Wu, W.-H. Hsu, Y.-C. Wu, M.-H. Huang, and S.-C. Chang Usefulness of low-dose spiral CT of the chest in regular follow-up of postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients: Preliminary report J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1300 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Egermann, K. Jaeggi, J.M. Habicht, A.P. Perruchoud, P. Dalquen, and M. Soler Regular follow-up after curative resection of nonsmall cell lung cancer: a real benefit for patients? Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2002; 19(3): 464 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Westeel, D. Choma, F. Clement, M.-C. Woronoff-Lemsi, J.-F. Pugin, A. Dubiez, and A. Depierre Relevance of an intensive postoperative follow-up after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2000; 70(4): 1185 - 1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Younes, J. L. Gross, and D. Deheinzelin Follow-up in Lung Cancer: How Often and for What Purpose? Chest, June 1, 1999; 115(6): 1494 - 1499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Virgo, R. C. Paniello, and F. E. Johnson Costs of Posttreatment Surveillance for Patients With Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 1998; 124(5): 564 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |