JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Keith S. Naunheim
Frank E. Johnson
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Virgo, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, F. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Virgo, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, F. E.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:356-363
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.


GENERAL THORACIC SURGERY

COST OF PATIENT FOLLOW-UP AFTER POTENTIALLY CURATIVE LUNG CANCER TREATMENT

Katherine S. Virgo, PhDa,b, Keith S. Naunheim, MDa,b, Lowell W. McKirgan, MAb, Mary Ellen Kissling, BAb, John C. Lin, BSa, Frank E. Johnson, MDa,b

Supported in part by a Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development Investigator Initiated Research grant No. 91-074.2.

Received for publication Sept. 12, 1995 Revisions requested Oct. 24, 1995; revisions received Nov. 16, 1995 Accepted for publication Nov. 21, 1995. Address for reprints: Katherine S. Virgo, PhD, Health Services Research, Department of Surgery, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, 3635 Vista Ave., P.O. Box 15250, St. Louis, MO 63110-0250.

Abstract

The two objectives of this study were to determine the range of recommended follow-up strategies for patients with lung cancer treated with curative intent and to estimate the cost of such follow-up. Ten articles delineating eight specific follow-up strategies were identified from a Medline search of the literature for 1980 through 1995. An economic analysis was done of the costs associated with the identified strategies. Charge data obtained from the Part B Medicare Annual Data file and the Hospital Outpatient Bill file were used as a proxy for cost. Follow-up intensity varied widely across strategies for 5 years of posttreatment follow-up. Medicare-allowed charges for 5-year follow-up ranged from a low of $946 to a high of $5645. When Medicare-allowed charges were converted to a proxy for actual charges by a conversion ratio of 1.62, the range was $1533 to $9145, a fivefold difference in charges. There was no indication that more intensive, higher-cost strategies increased survival or quality of life. The published literature, including textbooks, holds few answers in this area. (J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1996;112:356-63)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
T. Filleron, A. Barrett, O. Ataman, and A. Kramar
Planning Posttherapeutic Oncology Surveillance Visits Based on Individual Risk
Med Decis Making, September 1, 2009; 29(5): 570 - 579.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Rubins, M. Unger, and G. L. Colice
Follow-up and Surveillance of the Lung Cancer Patient Following Curative Intent Therapy: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 355S - 367S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
C. C. Earle
Outcomes Research in Lung Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 56 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C.-H. Chiu, M.-S. Chern, M.-H. Wu, W.-H. Hsu, Y.-C. Wu, M.-H. Huang, and S.-C. Chang
Usefulness of low-dose spiral CT of the chest in regular follow-up of postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients: Preliminary report
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1300 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
U. Egermann, K. Jaeggi, J.M. Habicht, A.P. Perruchoud, P. Dalquen, and M. Soler
Regular follow-up after curative resection of nonsmall cell lung cancer: a real benefit for patients?
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2002; 19(3): 464 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
V. Westeel, D. Choma, F. Clement, M.-C. Woronoff-Lemsi, J.-F. Pugin, A. Dubiez, and A. Depierre
Relevance of an intensive postoperative follow-up after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2000; 70(4): 1185 - 1190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
R. N. Younes, J. L. Gross, and D. Deheinzelin
Follow-up in Lung Cancer: How Often and for What Purpose?
Chest, June 1, 1999; 115(6): 1494 - 1499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
K. S. Virgo, R. C. Paniello, and F. E. Johnson
Costs of Posttreatment Surveillance for Patients With Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 1998; 124(5): 564 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1996 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.