HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Ron G. H. Speekenbrink Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Speekenbrink, R. G. H. Articles by Eijsman, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Speekenbrink, R. G. H. Articles by Eijsman, L.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:523-530
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS, MYOCARDIAL MANAGEMENT, AND SUPPORT TECHNIQUES

LOW-DOSE AND HIGH-DOSE APROTININ IMPROVE HEMOSTASIS IN CORONARY OPERATIONS

Supported by Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany.

Received for publication April 6, 1995 Accepted for publication Sept. 8, 1995. Address for reprints: C. R. H. Wildevuur, MD, PhD, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, P.O. Box 95500, 1090 HM Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Prophylactic aprotinin therapy has become a popular method to reduce bleeding associated with cardiac operations. Today essentially two dose regimens are used, a high-dose regimen with administration throughout the complete operative procedure and a low-dose regimen with administration only during bypass. In unblinded studies both regimens were found to be equally effective. This double-blind placebo-controlled study in 115 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting was done to confirm these results without potential investigator bias. Intraoperative hemoglobin loss was significantly reduced (p< 0.01) by 42% in the high-dose group and by 17% in the low-dose group compared with loss in control subjects. Blood loss 6 hours after operation was 377 ml in the low-dose and 266 ml in the high-dose group compared with 630 ml in the placebo group (p< 0.05 and p< 0.001, respectively). The average number of transfusions with packed red blood cells was reduced 31% in the low-dose group and 45% in the high-dose group, but the reductions were not significant. In a subgroup of patients, markers for coagulation and fibrinolysis were studied to investigate whether a different extent of activation existed. Fibrinolysis as measured by D-dimer levels was completely inhibited by the high-dose regimen, but was only partly suppressed in the low-dose group as compared with findings in the placebo group. Thrombin generation during cardiopulmonary bypass as reflected by F₁₊₂levels was lower in patients treated with aprotinin, but the difference was not significant. Concentrations of thrombin inactivated by antithrombin III were not different between the groups. The observation that low-dose aprotinin significantly improved hemostasis but did not inhibit hyperfibrinolysis supports our previous finding that low-dose aprotinin mainly protects platelet adhesive function. The better result obtained with high-dose aprotinin may indicate the contribution of hyperfibrinolysis to bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass. Because high-dose aprotinin is administered outside the period of full heparinization and might therefore increase the risk of thromboembolic complications, we propose a modification of the low-dose schedule to increase aprotinin levels sufficient for plasmin inhibition before release of the aortic crossclamp. (J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG1996;112:523-30)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. D. McEvoy, S. T. Reeves, J. G. Reves, and F. G. Spinale Aprotinin in Cardiac Surgery: A Review of Conventional and Novel Mechanisms of Action Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 949 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Brown, N. J.O. Birkmeyer, and G. T. O'Connor Meta-Analysis Comparing the Effectiveness and Adverse Outcomes of Antifibrinolytic Agents in Cardiac Surgery Circulation, June 5, 2007; 115(22): 2801 - 2813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Mannucci and M. Levi Prevention and Treatment of Major Blood Loss N. Engl. J. Med., May 31, 2007; 356(22): 2301 - 2311. [Full Text] [PDF]

				The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservatio, V. A. Ferraris, S. P. Ferraris, S. P. Saha, E. A. Hessel II, C. K. Haan, B. D. Royston, C. R. Bridges, R. S.D. Higgins, G. Despotis, et al. Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5_Supplement): S27 - S86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Fergusson, K. C. Glass, B. Hutton, and S. Shapiro Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding? Clinical Trials, June 1, 2005; 2(3): 218 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Frumento, C. M.N. O'Malley, and E. Bennett-Guerrero Stroke after cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis of the effect of aprotinin dosing regimens Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 479 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Munoz, N. J. O. Birkmeyer, J. D. Birkmeyer, G. T. O'Connor, and L. J. Dacey Is {epsilon}-Aminocaproic Acid as Effective as Aprotinin in Reducing Bleeding With Cardiac Surgery? : A Meta-Analysis Circulation, January 12, 1999; 99(1): 81 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G.H. Speekenbrink, R. M. Bertina, F. Espana, C. R.H. Wildevuur, and L. Eijsman Activation of the protein C system during cardiopulmonary bypass with and without aprotinin Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1998; 66(6): 1998 - 2002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]