HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hokken, R. B. Articles by Bos, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hokken, R. B. Articles by Bos, E.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:667-674
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.

SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE

DOES THE PULMONARY AUTOGRAFT IN THE AORTIC POSITION IN ADULTS INCREASE IN DIAMETER? AN ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC STUDY

Received for publication April 8, 1996 revisions requested June 20, 1996; revisions received Dec. 5, 1996 accepted for publication Dec. 9, 1996. Address for reprints: Raymond B. Hokken, MD, Cardiopulmonary Surgery, BD 156, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to discern the fate of the pulmonary autograft diameter over time in adults and its relation to aortic regurgitation in the setting of aortic root replacement.

Methods: From January 1989 to May 1995, 36 consecutive adult patients underwent aortic root replacement with a pulmonary autograft for aortic valve disease. The mean age of 20 male and 16 female patients was 29.1 years (range 19.3 to 52.1 years). The mean follow-up was 2.3 years (range 0.3 to 6.0 years). Two patients died in the hospital. One other patient had a second operation for stenosis at the distal suture line of the allograft in the pulmonary position. Pulmonary autograft anulus and sinus diameters were measured with epicardial echocardiography before (only anulus) and after cardiopulmonary bypass, with transthoracic echocardiography at hospital discharge, and with transesophageal echocardiography during follow-up.

Results: The mean autograft anulus diameter did not increase immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass (mean diameter 26.2 mm before and 26.4 mm after cardiopulmonary bypass). The mean autograft sinus diameter after cardiopulmonary bypass was 36.5 mm. The mean autograft anulus diameter increased to 31.5 mm at follow-up, an increase of 5.1 mm (19%). The mean autograft sinus diameter increased to 43.9 mm at follow-up, an increase of 7.4 mm (20%). Fifty-nine percent of the anulus diameter increase and 40% of the sinus diameter increase was already reached at hospital discharge (7 to 10 days after the operation); the other part of the increase occurred during follow-up. Diameter increase was associated with neither the length of follow-up (follow-up less than 1 year compared with a longer follow-up) or severity of aortic regurgitation.

Conclusion: Pulmonary autograft anulus and sinus diameters increase the first year after aortic root replacement with a pulmonary autograft. This occurs rapidly within 10 days after the operation, with a further increase during follow-up, without causing significant aortic regurgitation at medium-term follow-up.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. O. Bohm, W. Hemmer, J.-G. Rein, A. Horke, D. Roser, G. Blumenstock, and C. A. Botha A single-institution experience with the ross operation over 11 years. Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 87(2): 514 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. de Kerchove, J. Rubay, A. Pasquet, A. Poncelet, C. Ovaert, M. Pirotte, M. Buche, W. D'Hoore, P. Noirhomme, and G. El Khoury Ross Operation in the Adult: Long-Term Outcomes After Root Replacement and Inclusion Techniques Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 95 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Chiappini, B. Absil, J. Rubay, P. Noirhomme, J.-C. Funken, R. Verhelst, A. Poncelet, and G. El Khoury The Ross Procedure: Clinical and Echocardiographic Follow-Up in 219 Consecutive Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1285 - 1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Berdajs, G. Zund, U. Schurr, C. Camenisch, M. I. Turina, and M. Genoni Geometric models of the aortic and pulmonary roots: suggestions for the Ross procedure Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 31(1): 31 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Koul, F. Al-Rashidi, M. Bhat, and C. Meurling A modified Ross operation to prevent pulmonary autograft dilatation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 31(1): 127 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. O. Bohm, C. A. Botha, A. Horke, W. Hemmer, D. Roser, G. Blumenstock, F. Uhlemann, and J.-G. Rein Is the Ross operation still an acceptable option in children and adolescents? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 940 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. Luciani, A. Favaro, G. Casali, F. Santini, and A. Mazzucco Ross Operation in the Young: A Ten-Year Experience Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2271 - 2277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. F. Duebener, U. Stierle, A. Erasmi, M. F. Bechtel, D. Zurakowski, J. O. Bohm, C. A. Botha, W. Hemmer, J.-G. Rein, H.-H. Sievers, et al. Ross Procedure and Left Ventricular Mass Regression Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-415 - I-422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Rabkin-Aikawa, M. Aikawa, M. Farber, J. R. Kratz, G. Garcia-Cardena, N. T. Kouchoukos, M. B. Mitchell, R. A. Jonas, and F. J. Schoen Clinical pulmonary autograft valves: Pathologic evidence of adaptive remodeling in the aortic site J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2004; 128(4): 552 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. Luciani, G. Casali, A. Favaro, M. A. Prioli, L. Barozzi, F. Santini, and A. Mazzucco Fate of the Aortic Root Late After Ross Operation Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-61 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R B Hokken, J J M Takkenberg, L A van Herwerden, J R T C Roelandt, and A J J C Bogers Excessive pulmonary autograft dilatation causes important aortic regurgitation Heart, August 1, 2003; 89(8): 933 - 934. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ishizaka, E. J. Devaney, S. R. Ramsburgh, T. Suzuki, R. G. Ohye, and E. L. Bove Valve sparing aortic root replacement for dilatation of the pulmonary autograft and aortic regurgitation after the Ross procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 75(5): 1518 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. Luciani, L. Barozzi, A. Tomezzoli, G. Casali, and A. Mazzucco Reply J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2002; 123(6): 1223 - 1224. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Ohye, C. A. Gomez, B. J. Ohye, C. S. Goldberg, and E. L. Bove The Ross/Konno procedure in neonates and infants: intermediate-term survival and autograft function Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): 823 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.J.J.C. Bogers, J.J.M. Takkenberg, A.P. Kappetein, P.L. de Jong, A.H. Cromme-Dijkhuis, and M. Witsenburg Is there a place for pediatric valvotomy in the autograft era? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 20(1): 89 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. Luciani, L. Barozzi, A. Tomezzoli, G. Casali, and A. Mazzucco Bicuspid aortic valve disease and pulmonary autograft root dilatation after the Ross procedure: A clinicopathologic study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2001; 122(1): 74 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. David, A. Omran, J. Ivanov, S. Armstrong, M. P.L. de Sa, B. Sonnenberg, and G. Webb DILATION OF THE PULMONARY AUTOGRAFT AFTER THE ROSS PROCEDURE J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2000; 119(2): 210 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J.M. Takkenberg, P. E. Zondervan, and L. A. van Herwerden Progressive pulmonary autograft root dilatation and failure after Ross procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1999; 67(2): 551 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]