HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Aqeel A. Sandhu Henry M. Spotnitz Eric A. Rose Robert E. Michler Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sandhu, A. A. Articles by Michler, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sandhu, A. A. Articles by Michler, R. E.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:917-922
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS, MYOCARDIAL MANAGEMENT, AND SUPPORT TECHNIQUES

RETROGRADE CARDIOPLEGIA PRESERVES MYOCARDIAL FUNCTION AFTER INDUCED CORONARY AIR EMBOLISM

Received for publication Sept. 23, 1996 revisions requested Oct. 29, 1996; revisions received Jan. 1, 1997 accepted for publication Jan. 9, 1997. Address for reprints: Robert E. Michler, MD, 177 Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY 10032.

Abstract

Coronary air embolism is a potential complication of cardiopulmonary bypass. We compared left ventricular function before and after the administration of antegrade or retrograde cardioplegic solution in a porcine model of coronary air embolism. Nineteen pigs were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass support and cooled to 32° C. The heart was initially arrested with antegrade cold blood cardioplegic solution. The aortic crossclamp was released at 30 minutes and 0.02 cc/kg body weight of air was injected into the left anterior descending artery distal to the first diagonal branch. After 5 minutes the aorta was reclamped and the animals treated with 15 ml/kg body weight of 1:4 blood cardioplegic solution delivered by the antegrade (n = 6) or retrograde (n = 7) method. Control animals (n = 6) were not treated. Changes in regional preload recruitable stroke work were used to assess left ventricular performance before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Two control animals could not be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass. Left ventricular function was best preserved after treatment of induced coronary air embolism with retrograde cardioplegia (90% of baseline). Coronary air embolism treatment with antegrade cardioplegia resulted in diminished left ventricular performance (68% of baseline). In control animals left ventricular contractility was significantly impaired (39% of baseline). We conclude that administration of retrograde cardioplegic solution may be an effective method of treating coronary air embolism. The favorable outcome seen with cardioplegia may be in part because of its ability to protect the ischemic myocardium while the solution mechanically dislodges air from the vascular bed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. D. Mentzelopoulos, J. N. Kokotsakis, C. N. Romana, and E. A. Karamichali Intracoronary Thrombolysis and Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation for the Emergency Treatment of Probable Coronary Embolism After Repair of an Acute Ascending Aortic Dissection Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2001; 93(1): 56 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Ruengsakulrach and B. F. Buxton Anatomic and hemodynamic considerations influencing the efficiency of retrograde cardioplegia Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2001; 71(4): 1389 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Massetti, P. Bruno, G. Babatasi, E. Neri, and A. Khayat Coronary air embolism after cardiopulmonary bypass: letter 2 Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2000; 70(5): 1760 - 1761. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Chaudhuri and M. St.J. Hickey A simple method of treating coronary air embolism after cardiopulmonary bypass Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1867 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Massetti, G. Babatasi, and A. Khayat Enhanced air removal from coronary circulation during cardiac operations J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1998; 115(1): 264 - 264. [Full Text]