|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:46-52
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.
SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE |
Supported in part by a grant from Heartport, Inc., Redwood City, Calif. G.H.R. has a small equity position in Heartport, Inc.
Received for publication August 30, 1996 revisions requested Dec. 20, 1996; revisions received Feb. 3, 1997. accepted for publication Feb. 3, 1997. Address for reprints: Greg H. Ribakove, MD, New York University Medical Center, 530 First Ave., Suite 6D, New York, NY 10016.
Abstract
Objectives: Although minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is now feasible, using this technique to perform anastomoses on the beating or fibrillating heart may yield poorer graft patency than the standard open techniques that use cardioplegic arrest. This study tested the feasibility and anastomotic reproducibility of minimally invasive coronary bypass using newly developed port-access coronary artery bypass technology (Heartport, Inc., Redwood City, Calif.), which allows endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac venting, aortic occlusion, and cardioplegic arrest for internal thoracic arterycoronary artery anastomoses. Methods: Nineteen dogs had thoracoscopic takedown of either single (n = 14) or bilateral (n = 5) internal thoracic arteries followed by minimally invasive coronary bypass with cardioplegic arrest, done by means of the port-access system. The anastomotic technique was modified after the fourth animal by switching from a microscope to a 2.5 cm oval port and performing a conventional anastomosis with operative loupes. The adequacy of delivery of cardioplegic solution, ventricular decompression, and anastomotic patency was assessed. Results: The crossclamp and bypass times were 50 ± 15 minutes and 87 ± 28 minutes (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. The mean myocardial temperature after cardioplegia was 17° ± 1° C and the aortic pressure (3 ± 9 mm Hg) and pulmonary artery pressure (4 ± 1 mm Hg) were low throughout the procedure. All animals were weaned from bypass without inotropic agents. Angiograms and autopsies demonstrated successful thoracic artery takedown and anastomotic patency in 18 of 19 animals, with 100% anastomotic patency after the technique had been modified after the fourth animal. Conclusion: This study describes a reproducible technique for minimally invasive coronary bypass that allows myocardial protection, anastomotic precision, and predictable thoracic artery graft patency. Clinical trials are indicated
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. de Canniere, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, R. Cichon, V. Gulielmos, F. Van Praet, U. Seshadri-Kreaden, and V. Falk Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: Multicenter European experience J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2007; 134(3): 710 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dogan, K. Graubitz, T. Aybek, M. F. Khan, P. Kessler, A. Moritz, and G. Wimmer-Greinecker How safe is the port access technique in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 74(5): 1537 - 1543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Shennib, S. J. Korkola, N. Bousette, and A. Giaid An automated interrupted suturing device for coronary artery bypass grafting: automated coronary anastomosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 70(3): 1046 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A Grossi, P. K Zakow, G. Ribakove, K. Kallenbach, P. Ursomanno, C. E Gradek, F Gregory Baumann, S. B Colvin, and A. C Galloway Comparison of post-operative pain, stress response, and quality of life in port access vs. standard sternotomy coronary bypass patients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 16(suppl_2): S39 - S42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Grossi, M. A. Groh, E. A. Lefrak, G. H. Ribakove, R. A. Albus, A. C. Galloway, and S. B. Colvin Results of a prospective multicenter study on port-access coronary bypass grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 68(4): 1475 - 1477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Stephenson Jr, C. T. Ducko, S. Sankholkar, E. M. Hoenicke, G. A. Prophet, and R. J. Damiano Jr Computer-assisted endoscopic coronary artery bypass anastomoses: a chronic animal study Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 68(3): 838 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Galloway, R. J. Shemin, D. D. Glower, J. H. Boyer Jr, M. A. Groh, R. E. Kuntz, T. A. Burdon, G. H. Ribakove, B. A. Reitz, and S. B. Colvin First report of the port access international registry Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1999; 67(1): 51 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Stephenson Jr, S. Sankholkar, C. T. Ducko, and R. J. Damiano Jr Robotically assisted microsurgery for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1998; 66(3): 1064 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |