|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:633-640
© 1998 Mosby, Inc.
CARDIOPULMONARY SUPPORT AND PHYSIOLOGY |
San Francisco, Calif
From the Department of Cardiac Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif.
Received for publication Jan 30, 1998. Revisions requested March 24, 1998; revisions received May 7, 1998. Accepted for publication July 1, 1998. Address for reprints: David J. Farrar, PhD, Department of Cardiac Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center, 2351 Clay St, Room 5637, San Francisco, CA 94115.
Patient selection is crucial for the success of ventricular assist devices as a bridge to heart transplantation.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to identify preoperative markers for survival and end-organ recovery in patients having a ventricular assist device.
Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 32 severely ill patients with end-stage cardiac failure being mechanically bridged to heart transplantation with the Thoratec Ventricular Assist Device System (Thoratec Laboratories Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif) in a single center between 1984 and 1995. The preoperative cardiac index averaged 1.6 L/min per square meter with a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 29 mm Hg. Because of a high incidence of hepatic or renal dysfunction, or both (total bilirubin: 3.5 ± 6.2 mg/dL; creatinine: 2.0 ± 1.3 mg/dL), biventricular support was used in most patients (28/32). A total of 30 preoperative and 4 perioperative variables were evaluated for their association with survival and liver recovery.
Results: Nineteen patients (59.4%) survived to transplantation and 13 died. All 19 patients undergoing transplantation were discharged alive with a 1-year survival of 94.4%. All patients without liver recovery died of multiorgan failure. Direct and indirect bilirubin measurements were the only significant predictors for survival to discharge (P = .036, .045); all other factors failed to show significance. As direct bilirubin levels increased (normal range, 3 times normal, and >3 times normal), patient survival decreased (82%, 56%, and 33%, respectively). In addition, bilirubin and liver enzyme levels before insertion of the assist device were significantly associated with liver recovery during support with the device.
Conclusion: In our patient population with ventricular assist devices, liver function is the most predictive factor of patient survival in bridging to transplantation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kirsch, E. Vermes, C. Radu, B. Streich, K. Nakashima, A. Mekontso-Dessap, and D. Loisance Impact of preoperative hemodynamic support on early outcome in patients assisted with paracorporeal Thoratec((R)) ventricular assist device. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 34(2): 262 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. McGee Jr., P. M. McCarthy, and N. Moazami Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 507 - 534. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. An, Y.-B. Xiao, and Q.-J. Zhong Open-heart surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 1094 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hayashida, T. Shoujima, H. Teshima, Y. Yokokura, K. Takagi, H. Tomoeda, and S. Aoyagi Clinical outcome after cardiac operations in patients with cirrhosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 500 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Williams, J. Casher, N. Joshi, T. Hankinson, M. Warren, M. Oz, Y. Naka, and D. Mancini Insertion of a left ventricular assist device in patients without thorough transplant evaluations: a worthwhile risk? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 436 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. Miller Patient selection for the use of ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(90060): S66 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Moazami and P. M. McCarthy Temporary Circulatory Support Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 495 - 520. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Pagani, K. D. Aaronson, F. Swaniker, and R. H. Bartlett The use of extracorporeal life support in adult patients with primary cardiac failure as a bridge to implantable left ventricular assist device Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S77 - S81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Pagani, K. D. Aaronson, D. B. Dyke, S. Wright, F. Swaniker, and R. H. Bartlett Assessment of an extracorporeal life support to LVAD bridge to heart transplant strategy Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2000; 70(6): 1977 - 1985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A K Mahmood, J M Courtney, S Westaby, M Akdis, and H Reul Critical review of current left ventricular assist devices Perfusion, September 1, 2000; 15(5): 399 - 420. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |