|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:954-959
© 1998 Mosby, Inc.
GENERAL THORACIC SURGERY |
From the Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Received for publication Sept 5, 1997. Revisions requested Feb 9, 1998.Revisions received Aug 20, 1998. Accepted for publication Aug 28, 1998. Address for reprints: Y. Tachimori, MD, Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Tsukiji 5-Chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104, Japan.
Objective: We attempted to determine whether and under what circumstances surgical intervention should be recommended for patients with clinically positive cervical nodes for metastasis from thoracic esophageal carcinoma by pretreatment examination.
Methods: The survival of the patients was compared using factors including anatomic subsites of the tumor, T categories, subdivisions of N categories, and R classification according to the TNM classification.
Results: The 5-year survival of 63 patients who underwent surgery for primary therapy was 26.7%. There was no statistically significant difference between the postoperative survivals when compared according to the location of the tumors. As a matter of course, the patients with later stages of the disease had worse survival. However, by the multivariable analysis, significant difference was recognized between the patients with tumor invading adjacent structures (T4) and those without and between the patients who received curative resection and those who did not. The 5-year survival of 47 patients who underwent surgery without residual tumor was 32.9%.
Conclusion: Even when the patient had clinically positive cervical nodes from thoracic esophageal carcinoma, they had a possibility of long-term survival after curative resection with neck lymph node dissection. An operation is thus indicated for curative intent. Accurate pretreatment evaluation is important when deciding which patients require surgery and how to carry out a curative surgical procedure without residual tumor.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. C. Lee, J. L. Port, S. Paul, B. M. Stiles, and N. K. Altorki Predictors of long-term survival after resection of esophageal carcinoma with nonregional nodal metastases. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 88(1): 186 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tachimori, N. Kanamori, N. Uemura, N. Hokamura, H. Igaki, and H. Kato Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2009; 137(1): 49 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nagatani, Y. Shimada, M. Kondo, J. Kaganoi, M. Maeda, G. Watanabe, and M. Imamura A Strategy for Determining Which Thoracic Esophageal Cancer Patients Should Undergo Cervical Lymph Node Dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1881 - 1886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Igaki, H. Kato, Y. Tachimori, H. Daiko, M. Fukaya, S. Yajima, and Y. Nakanishi Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of patients with clinical Stage I squamous cell carcinomas of the thoracic esophagus treated with three-field lymph node dissection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 20(6): 1089 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Igaki, H. Kato, Y. Tachimori, H. Sato, H. Daiko, and Y. Nakanishi Prognostic evaluation for squamous cell carcinomas of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with three-field lymph node dissection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 19(6): 887 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |