| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:4-009
© 2000 Mosby, Inc.
SURGERY FOR CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE |
From the Section of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics and Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
Supported by a grant from the Gothenburg Medical Society.
Address for reprints: Laszlo Solymar, MD, PhD, Section of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-416 85, Göteborg, Sweden (E-mail: laszlo.solymar{at}sahlgrenska.se).
Objective: We sought to assess growth properties of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross operation in children.
Methods: Eight infants with critical aortic stenosis who underwent the Ross operation early in life (median age, 6.4 months) were followed up regarding the possible growth of the autograft. The pulmonary autograft was measured repeatedly by echocardiography during the follow-up, ranging from 6 months to 7 years (median, 5.2 years). Twelve normal children who served as control subjects were similarly followed from 3.9 to 5.8 years (median, 4.9 years).
Results: Somatic growth during the follow-up period was significant and was reflected in a doubling of the body surface area, which increased from 0.33 ± 0.14 m2 to 0.74 ± 0.21 m2. The proximal part of the autograft increased from 13.6 ± 3.6 mm to 23.3 ± 3.7 mm (mean ± SD) and the distal part from 10.5 ± 2.5 mm to 15.9 ± 2.8 mm. Growth pattern of the autograft was analyzed by relating measured diameters to predicted normal diameters (ie, Z values). During the first year after the operation, the mean Z value of the proximal autograft increased from 0.2 to 2.2, indicating a more rapid increase than the predicted increase and was also significantly higher than that of the control group (P = .01). After the first year, Z-value changes in patients and control subjects were very similar.
Conclusions: We thus conclude that the pulmonary autograft in the aortic position after the Ross operation does increase in size and that the pattern of this increase is suggestive of passive dilation in the early postoperative period, followed by normal active growth.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Alsoufi, Z. Al-Halees, C. Manlhiot, B. W. McCrindle, M. Al-Ahmadi, A. Sallehuddin, C. C. Canver, Z. Bulbul, M. Joufan, and B. Fadel Mechanical valves versus the Ross procedure for aortic valve replacement in children: Propensity-adjusted comparison of long-term outcomes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2009; 137(2): 362 - 370.e9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Carrel, M. Schwerzmann, F. Eckstein, T. Aymard, and A. Kadner Preliminary results following reinforcement of the pulmonary autograft to prevent dilatation after the Ross procedure. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 472 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Kadner, O. Raisky, A. Degandt, D. Tamisier, D. Bonnet, D. Sidi, and P. R. Vouhe The Ross Procedure in Infants and Young Children Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 803 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. D. Stewart, C. L. Backer, N. D. Hillman, C. Lundt, and C. Mavroudis The Ross Operation in Children: Effects of Aortic Annuloplasty Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1326 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. O. Bohm, C. A. Botha, A. Horke, W. Hemmer, D. Roser, G. Blumenstock, F. Uhlemann, and J.-G. Rein Is the Ross operation still an acceptable option in children and adolescents? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 940 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. A. Williams, J. M. Quaegebeur, D. T. Hsu, W. M. Gersony, F. Bourlon, R. S. Mosca, D. R. Gersony, and D. E. Solowiejczyk Ross Procedure in Infants and Toddlers Followed Into Childhood Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-390 - I-395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. L. Vida, T. Bottio, O. Milanesi, E. Reffo, R. Biffanti, R. Bonato, and G. Stellin Critical Aortic Stenosis in Early Infancy: Surgical Treatment for Residual Lesions After Balloon Dilation Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 47 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. G Raja and M. Pozzi Growth of Pulmonary Autograft After Ross Operation in Pediatric Patients Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2004; 12(4): 285 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Rabkin-Aikawa, M. Aikawa, M. Farber, J. R. Kratz, G. Garcia-Cardena, N. T. Kouchoukos, M. B. Mitchell, R. A. Jonas, and F. J. Schoen Clinical pulmonary autograft valves: Pathologic evidence of adaptive remodeling in the aortic site J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2004; 128(4): 552 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Hraska, M. Krajci, Ch. Haun, K. Ntalakoura, V. Razek, F. Lacour-Gayet, J. Weil, and H. Reichenspurner Ross and Ross-Konno procedure in children and adolescents: mid-term results Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 25(5): 742 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S. Cohen, B. S. Marino, D. B. McElhinney, D. Robbers-Visser, W. van der Woerd, J. W. Gaynor, T. L. Spray, and G. Wernovsky Neo-aortic root dilation and valve regurgitation up to 21 years after staged reconstruction for hypoplastic left heart syndrome J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 6, 2003; 42(3): 533 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Ishizaka, E. J. Devaney, S. R. Ramsburgh, T. Suzuki, R. G. Ohye, and E. L. Bove Valve sparing aortic root replacement for dilatation of the pulmonary autograft and aortic regurgitation after the Ross procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 75(5): 1518 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. O. Bohm, C. A. Botha, W. Hemmer, C. Starck, G. Blumenstock, D. Roser, and J.-G. Rein Older patients fare better with the Ross operation Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 796 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Al-Halees, F. Pieters, F. Qadoura, M. Shahid, M. Al-Amri, and F. Al-Fadley The Ross procedure is the procedure of choice for congenital aortic valve disease J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2002; 123(3): 437 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Lansac, H.S. Lim, Y. Shomura, K.H. Lim, W. Goetz, N.T. Rice, C. Acar, and C.M.G. Duran Aortic and pulmonary root: are their dynamics similar? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 268 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Hutter, B. J.M. Thomeer, P. Jansen, J. F. Hitchcock, J. A.J. Faber, E. J. Meijboom, and G. B.W.E. Bennink Fate of the aortic root after arterial switch operation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 20(1): 82 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Laudito, M. M. Brook, S. Suleman, M. S. Bleiweis, L. D. Thompson, F. L. Hanley, and V. M. Reddy The Ross procedure in children and young adults: A word of caution J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2001; 122(1): 147 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Walker, M. K. Heinemann, W. Schneider, M. Wehrmann, B. Bultmann, and G. Ziemer Early failure of the autograft valve after the Ross procedure J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2001; 122(1): 187 - 188. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Pessotto, W. J. Wells, C. J. Baker, C. Luna, and V. A. Starnes Midterm results of the Ross procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71 (2007): S336 - S339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Simon, C. Aschauer, R. Moidl, M. Marx, F.P. Keznickl, E. Eigenbauer, E. Wolner, and G. Wollenek Growth of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross operation in childhood Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 19(2): 118 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
