HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Eugene H. Blackstone Bruce W. Lytle Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blackstone, E. H. Articles by Lytle, B. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blackstone, E. H. Articles by Lytle, B. W.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:1221-1232
© 2000 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

COMPETING RISKS AFTER CORONARY BYPASS SURGERY: THE INFLUENCE OF DEATH ON REINTERVENTION

From the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery^a and the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology,^b The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Address for reprints: Eugene H. Blackstone, MD, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk F25, Cleveland, OH 44195 (E-mail: blackse{at}ccf.org ).

Objective: For groups of patients at high risk of death, such as older patients, the actual probability of experiencing a nonfatal event, such as reintervention, must be far smaller than the potential probability were there no attrition by death. Competing risks analysis quantifies the difference.
Methods: Multivariable analyses were performed for the competing events death before reintervention, reoperation, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 2001 patients after bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting and in 8123 after single internal thoracic artery grafting. Follow-up was 9.7 ± 3.0 years and 10.8 ± 5.2 years in bilateral and single internal thoracic artery groups, respectively.
Results: Patients receiving single grafts experienced shorter survival and more reinterventions (P < .0001). However, other risk factors for death included old age (P < .0001), but risk factors for reintervention included young age (P < .0001). This difference confounds interpretation of event-free survival that is clarified by competing risks analysis. Death reduced the potential benefit of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on reintervention by angioplasty from a median of 8.5% to 5.5% at 12 years and by reoperation from 9.3% to 6.8%, with progressively greater erosion of benefit from attrition by death as age increased. Competing risks simulation confirmed that young age was a true risk factor for reintervention, excluding the explanation that it reflected simply passive attrition by death as patients age.
Conclusions: Even after accounting for attrition by interim deaths, bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery grafting and older age are associated with fewer reinterventions. However, in high-risk patients, its benefit on freedom from reintervention is eroded considerably by death.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Tillmanns, M. Rota, T. Hosoda, Y. Misao, G. Esposito, A. Gonzalez, S. Vitale, C. Parolin, S. Yasuzawa-Amano, J. Muraski, et al. Formation of large coronary arteries by cardiac progenitor cells PNAS, February 5, 2008; 105(5): 1668 - 1673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. N. Anderson Comment on the "actual" problem editorial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2008; 135(2): 457 - 459. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Grunkemeier, R. Jin, M. J.C. Eijkemans, and J. J.M. Takkenberg Actual and Actuarial Probabilities of Competing Risks: Apples and Lemons Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5): 1586 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Rankin, R. H. Tuttle, A. S. Wechsler, T. L. Teichmann, D. D. Glower, and R. M. Califf Techniques and Benefits of Multiple Internal Mammary Artery Bypass at 20 Years of Follow-Up Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1008 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Czerny, R. Gottardi, D. Zimpfer, M. Schoder, M. Grabenwoger, J. Lammer, E. Wolner, and M. Grimm Transposition of the supraaortic branches for extended endovascular arch repair. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 709 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Rankin and F. E. Harrell Jr Measuring the therapeutic efficacy of coronary revascularization: Implications for future management J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 944 - 948. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Schenk, P. M. McCarthy, E. H. Blackstone, J. Feng, R. C. Starling, J. L. Navia, L. Zhou, K. J. Hoercher, N. G. Smedira, and K. Fukamachi Duration of inotropic support after left ventricular assist device implantation: Risk factors and impact on outcome J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2006; 131(2): 447 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. R. Burfeind Jr, D. D. Glower, A. S. Wechsler, R. H. Tuttle, L. K. Shaw, F. E. Harrell Jr, and J. S. Rankin Single Versus Multiple Internal Mammary Artery Grafting for Coronary Artery Bypass: 15-Year Follow-Up of a Clinical Practice Trial Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-27 - II-35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.M. Stevens, M. Carrier, L.P. Perrault, Y. Hebert, R. Cartier, D. Bouchard, A. Fortier, I. El-Hamamsy, and M. Pellerin Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts with concomitant saphenous vein grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: Effects on mortality and event-free survival J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2004; 127(5): 1408 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Czerny, T. Fleck, D. Zimpfer, M. Dworschak, W. Hofmann, D. Hutschala, D. Dunkler, M. Ehrlich, E. Wolner, and M. Grabenwoger Risk factors of mortality and permanent neurologic injury in patients undergoing ascending aortic and arch repair J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2003; 126(5): 1296 - 1301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kaempchen, T. Guenther, M. Toschke, G.L. Grunkemeier, M. Wottke, and R. Lange Assessing the benefit of biological valve prostheses: cumulative incidence (actual) vs. Kaplan-Meier (actuarial) analysis Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 710 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Navia, P. M. McCarthy, K. J. Hoercher, N. G. Smedira, M. K. Banbury, and E. H. Blackstone Do left ventricular assist device (LVAD) bridge-to-transplantation outcomes predict the results of permanent LVAD implantation? Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2051 - 2063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. B. Ferguson Jr, L. P. Coombs, and E. D. Peterson Internal thoracic artery grafting in the elderly patient undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: Room for process improvement? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2002; 123(5): 869 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. W. Lytle and F. D. Loop Superiority of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: It's Been a Long Time Comin' Circulation, October 30, 2001; 104(18): 2152 - 2154. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Grunkemeier and Y. Wu Interpretation of nonfatal events after cardiac surgery: Actual versus actuarial reporting J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 216 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Grunkemeier, R. P. Anderson, and A. Starr Actuarial and actual analysis of surgical results: empirical validation Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 71(6): 1885 - 1887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]