|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:450-458
© 2000 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
From the Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery,a Department of Cardiology,b and the Department of Pathology,c All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Address for reprints: A. Sampath Kumar, Professor, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110029, India.
Objective: Results of mitral valve replacement with a mitral homograft were evaluated at 5 years to assess the suitability of the procedure.
Methods: Thirty-seven patients (25 male subjects) aged 10 to 49 years (mean, 32 ± 10 years) with rheumatic mitral valve disease underwent total (n = 35) or partial (n = 2) mitral valve replacement with a fresh antibiotic-preserved (n = 23) or cryopreserved (n = 14) mitral homograft. The predominant lesion was mitral stenosis (n = 30).
Results: There were 5 early deaths. Operative survivors were followed up for 1 to 60 months (mean, 26.6 ± 12 months). Among these, 21 patients had severe mitral regurgitation during the follow-up period; 3 died and 8 underwent reoperation. The homograft failure rate was not affected by preoperative physiologic lesion (stenosis vs regurgitation, P = .4), type of homograft (antibiotic-preserved vs cryopreserved homograft, P = .9), papillary muscle pretreatment (yes vs no, P = .9), or addition of posterior collar annuloplasty (yes vs no, P = .2). Among the remaining patients, 5 had moderate mitral regurgitation, 4 had either trivial or mild mitral regurgitation, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Study of the explanted mitral homografts (n = 8) revealed that disruption of one of the donor papillary muscles was responsible for early failures (n = 2), whereas cuspal and chordal degeneration was responsible for late failures (n = 6). Microscopically, the explanted valve lacked any viable cellular elements, and there was no evidence of immunologic injury to the homografts.
Conclusion: The mitral homograft did not fulfill our expectations as a suitable substitute for the diseased mitral valve.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Gudbjartsson, T. Absi, and S. Aranki Mitral Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1031 - 1068. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Navia, K. Doi, F. A. Atik, K. Fukamachi, M. W. Kopcak Jr, R. Dessoffy, P. Ruda-Vega, M. Garcia, P. L. Houghtaling, M. Martin, et al. Acute in vivo evaluation of a new stentless mitral valve J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2007; 133(4): 986 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Mahesh, G. Angelini, M. Caputo, X. Y. Jin, and A. Bryan Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 1151 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Wood, D. G. Healy, L. Nolke, D. Duff, P. Oslizlok, and K. Walsh Mitral valve reconstruction in a pediatric population: Late clinical results and predictors of long-term outcome J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2005; 130(1): 66 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zegdi, M. Debieche, C. Latremouille, D. Lebied, C. Chardigny, J.-M. Grinda, S. Chauvaud, A. Deloche, A. Carpentier, and J.-N. Fabiani Long-Term Results of Mitral Valve Repair in Active Endocarditis Circulation, May 17, 2005; 111(19): 2532 - 2536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. W. Mohr, S. Lehmann, V. Falk, S. Metz, C. Walther, N. Doll, A. Rastan, J. Gummert, and T. Walther Clinical Experience With Stentless Mitral Valve Replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 772 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ali, B. Iung, E. Lansac, P. Bruneval, and C. Acar Homograft replacement of the mitral valve: Eight-year results J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2004; 128(4): 529 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Kabbani, H. Jamil, A. Hammoud, J. A. Hatab, F. Nabhani, R. Hariri, N. Sabbagh, and D. Ross The mitral pulmonary autograft: assessment at midterm Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 60 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Walther, S. Lehmann, V. Falk, C. Walther, N. Doll, A. Rastan, S. Metz, J. Schneider, J. Gummert, and F. W. Mohr Midterm Results After Stentless Mitral Valve Replacement Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-85 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chauvaud, T. Waldmann, N. d'Attellis, P. Bruneval, C. Acar, J. Gerota, M. Jarraya, and A. Carpentier Homograft replacement of the mitral valve in young recipients: mid-term results Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 23(4): 560 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Acar The mitral homograft--Is it worthwhile? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2003; 125(90030): S4 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gudbjartsson, S. Aranki, and L. H. Cohn Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 951 - 986. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Timek, D. T. Lai, F. A. Tibayan, P. Dagum, G. T. Daughters, D. Liang, N. B. Ingels Jr, and D. C. Miller Hemodynamic performance of an unstented xenograft mitral valve substitute J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2002; 124(3): 541 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Prifti, V. Vanini, M. Bonacchi, G. Frati, M. Bernabei, G. Giunti, A. Crucean, S. Vincenzo Luisi, and B. Murzi Repair of congenital malformations of the mitral valve: early and midterm results Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 614 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Acar Editorial: The mitral homograft--Is it worthwhile? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2000; 120(3): 448 - 449. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |