HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Peter de Haan Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hulscher, J. B. F. Articles by van Lanschot, J. J. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hulscher, J. B. F. Articles by van Lanschot, J. J. B.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:1093-1096
© 2000 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

General Thoracic Surgery

Injury to the major airways during subtotal esophagectomy: Incidence, management, and sequelae

From the Departments of Surgery,^a Cardio-pulmonary Surgery,^b and Anesthesiology,^c Academic Medical Center at the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Address for reprints: J. B. F. Hulscher, MD, Academic Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Suite G4-134, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands (E-mail: J.B.Hulscher{at}AMC.UVA.NL).

Objective: The objective of this study was to gain insight into the incidence and sequelae of injury to the major airways during subtotal esophagectomy.
Methods: We performed an analysis of 383 consecutive patients undergoing this procedure between 1993 and 1999. Indications were adenocarcinoma (220), squamous cell carcinoma (121), and other (42). Transhiatal resection was done in 269 (70%) patients and transthoracic resection in 114 (30%).
Results: There were 4 men and 2 women (median age 57 years; range 45 to 68 years) with injury to the major airways, recognized during surgery in 5 patients and on the first postoperative day in the other. Five lesions occurred during transhiatal resection (5 of 269 = 1.8%) and 1 during transthoracic resection (1 of 114 = 0.8%; P = .67). The injury occurred proximal to the carina in 5 patients and in the left main bronchus in the other. All injuries could be closed primarily. The defect was covered with pericardium in 1 patient and with pleura in 2 patients. In all cases the gastric tube was placed over the defect. Pulmonary complications developed in 4 patients. Patients with tracheal injury required artificial ventilation for a longer period (median 6 days vs 1 day; P = .02) and stayed longer in the intensive care unit (median 11 vs 3 days; P < .01) than patients without such injury, although hospital time was not significantly prolonged (median 23 vs 16 days; P = .09). There was no associated mortality.
Conclusion: Tracheobronchial injury is a rare complication of subtotal esophagectomy. It can be managed effectively by primary closure and apposition of vital tissue (gastric tube) to the defect. It is associated with pulmonary complications, leading to prolonged assisted ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit, but mortality is rare.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Gupta, S. K.S. Thingnam, S. Kuthe, and G. R. Verma A novel surgical technique of repair of posterior wall laceration of thoracic trachea during transhiatal esophagectomy Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2009; 9(2): 347 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Buskens, J. B.F. Hulscher, P. Fockens, H. Obertop, and J. J. B. van Lanschot Benign tracheo-neo-esophageal fistulas after subtotal esophagectomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 72(1): 221 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]