JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Hajime Otani
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Imamura, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Imamura, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - pharmacology
Right arrow Myocardial protection

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:0137-0148
© 2001 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology

Protein kinase C isoform–dependent myocardial protection by ischemic preconditioning and potassium cardioplegia

Kejie Lu, MD*, Hajime Otani, MD, Tadashi Yamamura, MD, Yoshihisa Nakao, MD, Reiji Hattori, MD, Hideki Ninomiya, MD, Motohiko Osako, MD, Hiroji Imamura, MD

From the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi City, Osaka, Japan.

Received for publication June 15, 2000. Revisions requested July 25, 2000; revisions received Aug 7, 2000. Accepted for publication Aug 28, 2000. Address for reprints: Hajime Otani, MD, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kansai Medical University, 10-15 Fumizono-cho, Moriguchi City, Osaka 570-8507, Japan (E-mail: otanih{at}takii.kmu.ac.jp).

Objective: Ischemic preconditioning combined with potassium cardioplegia does not always confer additive myocardial protection. This study tested the hypothesis that the efficacy of ischemic preconditioning under potassium cardioplegia is dependent on protein kinase C isoform.
Methods: Isolated and crystalloid-perfused rat hearts underwent 5 cycles of 1 minute of ischemia and 5 minutes of reperfusion (low-grade ischemic preconditioning) or 3 cycles of 5 minutes of ischemia and 5 minutes of reperfusion (high-grade ischemic preconditioning) or time-matched continuous perfusion. These hearts received a further 5 minutes of infusion of normal buffer or oxygenated potassium cardioplegic solution. The isoform nonselective protein kinase C inhibitor chelerythrine (5 µmol/L) was administered throughout the preischemic period. All hearts underwent 35 minutes of normothermic global ischemia followed by 30 minutes of reperfusion. Isovolumic left ventricular function and creatine kinase release were measured as the end points of myocardial protection. Distribution of protein kinase C {alpha}, {delta}, and {epsilon} in the cytosol and the membrane fractions were analyzed by Western blotting and quantified by a densitometric assay.
Results: Low-grade ischemic preconditioning was almost as beneficial as potassium cardioplegia in improving functional recovery; left ventricular developed pressure 30 minutes after reperfusion was 70 ± 15 mm Hg (P < .01) in low-grade ischemic preconditioning and 77 ± 14 mm Hg (P < .001) in potassium cardioplegia compared with values found in unprotected control hearts (39 ± 12 mm Hg). Creatine kinase release during reperfusion was also equally inhibited by low-grade ischemic preconditioning (18.2 ± 10.6 IU/g dry weight, P < .05) and potassium cardioplegia (17.6 ± 6.7 IU/g, P < .01) compared with control values. However, low-grade ischemic preconditioning in combination with potassium cardioplegia conferred no significant additional myocardial protection; left ventricular developed pressure was 80 ± 17 mm Hg, and creatine kinase release was 14.8 ± 11.0 IU/g. In contrast, high-grade ischemic preconditioning with potassium cardioplegia conferred better myocardial protection than potassium cardioplegia alone; left ventricular developed pressure was 121 ± 16 mm Hg (P < .001), and creatine kinase release was 8.3 ± 5.8 IU/g (P < .05). Chelerythrine itself had no significant effect on functional recovery and creatine kinase release in the control hearts, but it did inhibit the salutary effects not only of low-grade and high-grade ischemic preconditioning but also those of potassium cardioplegia. Low-grade ischemic preconditioning and potassium cardioplegia enhanced translocation of protein kinase C {alpha} to the membrane, whereas high-grade ischemic preconditioning also enhanced translocation of protein kinase C {delta} and {epsilon}. Chelerythrine inhibited translocation of all 3 protein kinase C isoforms.
Conclusions: These results suggest that myocardial protection by low-grade ischemic preconditioning and potassium cardioplegia are mediated through enhanced translocation of protein kinase C {alpha} to the membrane. It is therefore suggested that activation of the novel protein kinase C isoforms is necessary to potentiate myocardial protection under potassium cardioplegia.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.