|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:702-707
© 2001 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
From the Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Received for publication April 19, 2000. Revisions requested May 25, 2000; revisions received July 7, 2000. Accepted for publication Aug 29, 2000. Address for reprints: Miralem Pasic, MD, PhD, FETCS, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Klinik für Herz-, Thorax- und Gefässchirurgie, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany (E-mail: pasic{at}dhzb.de).
Abstract
Objectives: Less-invasive approaches in cardiac operations offer certain cosmetic advantages, but it is unclear whether there are additional positive effects with regard to the postoperative recovery of patients. The aim of this prospective and randomized study was to ascertain whether partial inferior midline sternotomy can improve pulmonary function, one of the best quantifiable parameters of postoperative recovery, after coronary artery bypass operations when compared with the standard full midline approach.
Methods: One hundred patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized either for a full median sternotomy (standard sternotomy group, n = 50) or for a partial inferior sternotomy (ministernotomy group, n = 50). The following pulmonary features were assessed: vital capacity, forced expiratory volume, percentage of forced expiratory volume from vital capacity, total lung capacity, residual volume, maximum inspiratory pressure, and maximum expiratory pressure. Tests were performed preoperatively and on the fourth and tenth postoperative days.
Results: On the fourth postoperative day, both groups had a significant decrease in vital capacity (percentage of predicted values) when compared with preoperative values (preoperative vs fourth day: standard sternotomy group, 87.8% ± 14.3% vs 42.1% ± 10.2% [P < .0001]; ministernotomy group, 84.5% ± 14.3% vs 41.5% ± 11.8% [P < .0001]), with a significant tendency for recovery from the fourth to the tenth postoperative day (fourth vs tenth postoperative day: standard sternotomy group, 42.1% ± 10.2% vs 66.3% ± 12.3% [P = .001]; ministernotomy group, 41.5% ± 11.8% vs 61.3% ± 13.1 % [P = .002]). There were no differences in any test results between the groups on either the fourth or the tenth postoperative day.
Conclusion: A less-invasive approach for coronary artery bypass operations with a partial inferior sternotomy does not improve early postoperative pulmonary function when compared with the conventional approach with a full sternotomy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. S.Y. Chang, N. G. Smedira, C. L. Chang, M. M. Benavides, U. Myhre, J. Feng, E. H. Blackstone, and B. W. Lytle Cardiac surgery after mediastinal radiation: Extent of exposure influences outcome J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 404 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wynne and M. Botti Postoperative Pulmonary Dysfunction in Adults After Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Clinical Significance and Implications for Practice Am. J. Crit. Care., September 1, 2004; 13(5): 384 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Weissman Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 185 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K.W. Sim and R. T. Grignani Lesser impairment of respiratory function is the mechanism of faster recovery after partial sternotomy for valve replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1360 - 1360. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Detter Reply to Meharwal and Trehan Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 895 - 896. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |