JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Matthias Bauer
Miralem Pasic
Roland Hetzer
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hetzer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hetzer, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:702-707
© 2001 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Ministernotomy versus complete sternotomy for coronary bypass operations: No difference in postoperative pulmonary function

Matthias Bauer, MD, Miralem Pasic, MD, PhD, FETCS, Rail Ewert, MD, Roland Hetzer, MD, PhD, FETCS

From the Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Received for publication April 19, 2000. Revisions requested May 25, 2000; revisions received July 7, 2000. Accepted for publication Aug 29, 2000. Address for reprints: Miralem Pasic, MD, PhD, FETCS, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Klinik für Herz-, Thorax- und Gefässchirurgie, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany (E-mail: pasic{at}dhzb.de).

Abstract

Objectives: Less-invasive approaches in cardiac operations offer certain cosmetic advantages, but it is unclear whether there are additional positive effects with regard to the postoperative recovery of patients. The aim of this prospective and randomized study was to ascertain whether partial inferior midline sternotomy can improve pulmonary function, one of the best quantifiable parameters of postoperative recovery, after coronary artery bypass operations when compared with the standard full midline approach.
Methods: One hundred patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized either for a full median sternotomy (standard sternotomy group, n = 50) or for a partial inferior sternotomy (ministernotomy group, n = 50). The following pulmonary features were assessed: vital capacity, forced expiratory volume, percentage of forced expiratory volume from vital capacity, total lung capacity, residual volume, maximum inspiratory pressure, and maximum expiratory pressure. Tests were performed preoperatively and on the fourth and tenth postoperative days.
Results: On the fourth postoperative day, both groups had a significant decrease in vital capacity (percentage of predicted values) when compared with preoperative values (preoperative vs fourth day: standard sternotomy group, 87.8% ± 14.3% vs 42.1% ± 10.2% [P < .0001]; ministernotomy group, 84.5% ± 14.3% vs 41.5% ± 11.8% [P < .0001]), with a significant tendency for recovery from the fourth to the tenth postoperative day (fourth vs tenth postoperative day: standard sternotomy group, 42.1% ± 10.2% vs 66.3% ± 12.3% [P = .001]; ministernotomy group, 41.5% ± 11.8% vs 61.3% ± 13.1 % [P = .002]). There were no differences in any test results between the groups on either the fourth or the tenth postoperative day.
Conclusion: A less-invasive approach for coronary artery bypass operations with a partial inferior sternotomy does not improve early postoperative pulmonary function when compared with the conventional approach with a full sternotomy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. S.Y. Chang, N. G. Smedira, C. L. Chang, M. M. Benavides, U. Myhre, J. Feng, E. H. Blackstone, and B. W. Lytle
Cardiac surgery after mediastinal radiation: Extent of exposure influences outcome
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 404 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
R. Wynne and M. Botti
Postoperative Pulmonary Dysfunction in Adults After Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Clinical Significance and Implications for Practice
Am. J. Crit. Care., September 1, 2004; 13(5): 384 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
C. Weissman
Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 185 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. K.W. Sim and R. T. Grignani
Lesser impairment of respiratory function is the mechanism of faster recovery after partial sternotomy for valve replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1360 - 1360.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Detter
Reply to Meharwal and Trehan
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 895 - 896.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.