|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:649-655
© 2001 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Aquired Cardiovascular Disease (ACD) |
From the Departments of Cardiovascular Surgerya and Pathology,b National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,c Kanto Medical Center, NTT EC, Tokyo, Japan; and Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,d Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Received for publication May 16, 2000. Revisions requested Aug 8, 2000; revisions received Oct 16, 2000. Accepted for publication March 1, 2001. Address for reprints: Hirohisa Machida, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1, Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka 565, Japan (E-mail: hmachida{at}d2.dion.ne.jp).
Abstract
Objective: We sought to investigate the durability and mechanism of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenograft in the mitral position in comparison with that of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft.
Methods: A total of 284 patients who received the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft in the mitral position between 1980 and 1984 and 84 patients who received the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenograft in the mitral position between 1984 and 1999 were included in the study. The freedom from reoperation rates for both graft types were determined. For morphologic study, the pathologic findings of 23 valves of 123 explanted Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts with structural valve deterioration, nonstructural valve deterioration, or both were determined and compared with those of 20 explanted Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts with structural valve deterioration, nonstructural valve deterioration, or both. Each pathologic finding was graded and assigned a score. Both types were matched for age at reoperation (50-75 years) and duration of valve function (8-11 years).
Results: Freedom from reoperation caused by structural valve deterioration, nonstructural valve deterioration, or both was significantly better for Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts than for Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts at 8 years after the operation (Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts: 91.3% vs Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts: 71.9%, P = .0061), but it was similar for both types at 12 years (Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts: 43.6% vs Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts: 43.6%, P = .2865). No severe leaflet tears were seen among Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts. The mean area percentage of tissue overgrowth was 15.3% in Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts and 3.4% in Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts (P = .0001). The mean calcification area percentage was 13.6% in Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts and 31.5% in Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts (P = .0001).
Conclusions: Tissue overgrowth on the atrial surface, ventricular surface, or both was the cause of structural valve deterioration, nonstructural valve deterioration, or both of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts in adults. This was different from Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft failure, which resulted from severe calcification and leaflet tears. Organized thrombi on cusps, in addition to valve design, may have contributed to such tissue overgrowth on Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Watanabe, S. Ohkawa, K. Yamabuki, H. Tsuneoka, N. Sugiyama, and T. Hiyama A Case of 24 Years Longevity of an Ionescu-Shiley Bioprosthesis in the Mitral Position Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, October 1, 2006; 14(5): e96 - e98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Flameng, B. Meuris, J. Yperman, G. De Visscher, P. Herijgers, and E. Verbeken Factors influencing calcification of cardiac bioprostheses in adolescent sheep J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 89 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hamamoto, K. Bando, J. Kobayashi, T. Satoh, Y. Sasako, K. Niwaya, O. Tagusari, T. Yagihara, and S. Kitamura Durability and outcome of aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair versus double valve replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 28 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |