JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finkelstein, R.
Right arrow Articles by Milo, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Finkelstein, R.
Right arrow Articles by Milo, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - pharmacology

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:326-332
© 2002 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease (ACD)

Vancomycin versus cefazolin prophylaxis for cardiac surgery in the setting of a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections

R. Finkelstein, MDa,b, G. Rabino, MAa, T. Mashiah, MAa, Y. Bar-El, MDa,b, Z. Adler, MDa, V. Kertzman, MDa, O. Cohen, a, S. Milo, MDa,b

From Rambam Medical Centera and Technion-Israel Institute of Technology,b Haifa, Israel.

Received for publication April 23, 2001; revisions requested June 6, 2001 Revisions received July 12, 2001. Accepted for publication July 20, 2001. Address for reprints: R. Finkelstein, MD, Infectious Diseases Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa 31096, Israel (E-mail: rfinkelstein{at}rambam.health.gov.il).

Objective: This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of vancomycin prophylaxis with that of cefazolin in preventing surgical site infections in a tertiary medical center with a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections.
Methods: All adult patients (>=18 years) scheduled for cardiac surgery requiring sternotomy were randomly assigned to receive vancomycin (1 g every 12 hours) or cefazolin (1 g every 8 hours). Prophylaxis was started during the induction of anesthesia and continued for only 24 hours. Patients were followed up for at least 30 days (1 year for those receiving a cardiac implant). Surgical site infections were stratified according to the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System risk index.
Results: Of the 885 patients included in the study, 452 received vancomycin and 433 received cefazolin. The overall surgical site infection rates were similar in the two groups (43 cases in the vancomycin group, 9.5%, vs 39 cases in the cefazolin group, 9.0%, P = .8). Superficial and deep incisional surgical site infection rates were also similar in the two groups. There was a trend toward more frequent organ-space infections and infections with ß-lactam–resistant organisms among patients receiving cefazolin, but this trend did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, surgical site infections caused by methicillin-susceptible staphylococci were significantly more common in the vancomycin group (17 cases, 3.7%, vs 6 cases, 1.3%, P = .04). The durations of postoperative hospitalization and the mortalities were similar in the two groups.
Conclusions: This trial suggests that vancomycin and cefazolin have similar efficacy in preventing surgical site infections in cardiac surgery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Meehan, A. A. Jamali, and H. Nguyen
Prophylactic Antibiotics in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2009; 91(10): 2480 - 2490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. Tamayo, J. Gualis, S. Florez, J. Castrodeza, J. M. Eiros Bouza, and F. J. Alvarez
Comparative study of single-dose and 24-hour multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for cardiac surgery.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2008; 136(6): 1522 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
L. Prokuski
Prophylactic Antibiotics in Orthopaedic Surgery
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2008; 16(5): 283 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. W. Garey, D. Lai, T. K. Dao-Tran, L. O. Gentry, L. Y. Hwang, and B. R. Davis
Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Vancomycin Compared to Cefuroxime for Surgical Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2008; 52(2): 446 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K. Dhadwal, S. Al-Ruzzeh, T. Athanasiou, M. Choudhury, P. Tekkis, P. Vuddamalay, H. Lyster, M. Amrani, and S. George
Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes of two antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for sternal wound infection in high-risk patients following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial
Heart, September 1, 2007; 93(9): 1126 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
N. Fletcher, D. Sofianos, M. B. Berkes, and W. T. Obremskey
Prevention of Perioperative Infection
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2007; 89(7): 1605 - 1618.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. Engelman, D. Shahian, R. Shemin, T. S. Guy, D. Bratzler, F. Edwards, M. Jacobs, H. Fernando, and C. Bridges
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cardiac Surgery, Part II: Antibiotic Choice
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1569 - 1576.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Paul, A. Raz, L. Leibovici, H. Madar, R. Holinger, and B. Rubinovitch
Sternal wound infection after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Validation of existing risk scores
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 397 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. W. Garey, T. Dao, H. Chen, P. Amrutkar, N. Kumar, M. Reiter, and L. O. Gentry
Timing of vancomycin prophylaxis for cardiac surgery patients and the risk of surgical site infections
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 645 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
S. Kachroo, T. Dao, F. Zabaneh, M. Reiter, M. T LaRocco, L. O Gentry, and K. W Garey
Tolerance of Vancomycin for Surgical Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery and Incidence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Colonization
Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2006; 40(3): 381 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. H. Edwards, R. M. Engelman, P. Houck, D. M. Shahian, and C. R. Bridges
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cardiac Surgery, Part I: Duration
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 397 - 404.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
Antibacterial prophylaxis in surgery: 3 - Arterial surgery in the abdomen, pelvis and lower limbs
DTB, June 1, 2004; 42(6): 43 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
M.-R. Movahed, B. Kasravi, and C. S. Bryan
Prophylactic Use of Vancomycin in Adult Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2004; 9(1): 13 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.