JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Michaela Straznicka
David M. Follette
Peter F. Roberts
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Straznicka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Babcock, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Straznicka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Babcock, W. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - transplantation

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:250-258
© 2002 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Cardiothoracic Transplantation (TX)

Aggressive management of lung donors classified as unacceptable: Excellent recipient survival one year after transplantation

Michaela Straznicka, MDa, David M. Follette, MDa, Mark D. Eisner, MDb, Peter F. Roberts, MDa, Rebecca L. Menza, RNc, Wayne D. Babcock, RNc

From the Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento,a and the Division of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, University of California San Franciscob and the California Transplant Donor Network,c San Francisco, Calif.

Read at the Twenty-seventh Annual Meeting of The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, San Diego, Calif, June 20-23, 2001.

Received for publication June 28, 2001. Revisions requested Aug 3, 2001; revisions received Nov 1, 2001. Accepted for publication Dec 7, 2001. Address for reprints: David M. Follette, MD, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 2nd Floor, Sacramento, CA 95817-1418 (E-mail: david.follette{at}ucdmc.ucdavis.edu).

Objective: A dire shortage of lungs for transplantation exists. We hypothesized that aggressive organ procurement organization management of lungs usually rated as unacceptable (ratio of PaO2 to inspired oxygen fraction <150) might make them acceptable for transplantation. We also hypothesized that lungs from donors who died of trauma could be used for transplantation with recipient survival comparable with that seen with lungs from donors who died of nontraumatic causes.
Methods: From January, 1, 1995, through August 31, 2000, a total of 194 donors resulted in 228 lung transplants. Of these, 27 donors were deemed unacceptable for lung transplantation according to organ procurement organization protocol. We used the California Transplant Donor Network database to conduct a retrospective review of all 194 donors, including the 27 supposedly unacceptable donors who were treated with invasive monitoring (central venous pressure), methylprednisolone, fluid restriction, inotropic agents, bronchoscopy, and diuresis. We evaluated survivals at 30 days and 1 year of patients who received lungs rated as unacceptable and acceptable. In addition, we compiled data on recipient survival for a subgroup of 122 recipients with lungs from donors who died of trauma and compared these data with those of recipients who received lungs from donors who died of nontraumatic causes to see whether the donor's death by trauma resulted in higher recipient mortality.
Results: After aggressive organ procurement organization management, ratios of PaO2 to inspired oxygen fraction, central venous pressures, fluid balances, dopamine requirements, and chest radiographs of unacceptable donors according to organ procurement organization criteria were comparable with those of acceptable donors. There were no significant differences in recipient mortality between groups at 30 days or 1 year after transplantation. Moreover, no significant difference was found in mortalities of recipients who received lungs from donors who died of traumatic and nontraumatic causes.
Conclusion: Aggressive organ procurement organization management of donors initially considered unacceptable may increase the number of lungs available for transplantation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
D. Van Raemdonck, A. Neyrinck, G. M. Verleden, L. Dupont, W. Coosemans, H. Decaluwe, G. Decker, P. De Leyn, P. Nafteux, and T. Lerut
Lung Donor Selection and Management
Proceedings of the ATS, January 15, 2009; 6(1): 28 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
J. DuBose and A. Salim
Aggressive Organ Donor Management Protocol
J Intensive Care Med, November 1, 2008; 23(6): 367 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. V. Venkateswaran, V. B. Patchell, I. C. Wilson, J. G. Mascaro, R. D. Thompson, D. W. Quinn, R. A. Stockley, J. H. Coote, and R. S. Bonser
Early Donor Management Increases the Retrieval Rate of Lungs for Transplantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 278 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. F. Angel, D. J. Levine, M. I. Restrepo, S. Johnson, E. Sako, A. Carpenter, J. Calhoon, J. E. Cornell, S. G. Adams, G. B. Chisholm, et al.
Impact of a Lung Transplantation Donor-Management Protocol on Lung Donation and Recipient Outcomes
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2006; 174(6): 710 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Botha, D. Trivedi, C. J. Weir, C. P. Searl, P. A. Corris, J. H. Dark, and S. V.B. Schueler
Extended donor criteria in lung transplantation: Impact on organ allocation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 1154 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
B. A. Whitson, D. S. Nath, A. C. Johnson, A. R. Walker, M. E. Prekker, D. M. Radosevich, C. S. Herrington, and P. S. Dahlberg
Risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2006; 131(1): 73 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Lardinois, M. Banysch, S. Korom, S. Hillinger, V. Rousson, A. Boehler, R. Speich, and W. Weder
Extended donor lungs: eleven years experience in a consecutive series
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 27(5): 762 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. de Perrot, W. Weder, G.A. Patterson, and S. Keshavjee
Strategies to increase limited donor resources
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2004; 23(3): 477 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
C. L. Lau, G. A. Patterson, and S. M. Palmer
Critical Care Aspects of Lung Transplantation
J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 2004; 19(2): 83 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C.L. Lau and G.A. Patterson
Current status of lung transplantation
Eur. Respir. J., November 16, 2003; 22(47_suppl): 57s - 64s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.