HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Gordon Cohen Marco Ricci Martin J. Elliott Marc R. de Leval Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cohen, G. Articles by de Leval, M. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cohen, G. Articles by de Leval, M. R. Related Collections Pleura Minimally invasive surgery

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:79-84
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

General Thoracic Surgery (GTS)

Primary thoracoscopic treatment of empyema in children

From the Cardiothoracic Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom

Read at the Eighty-second Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Washington, DC, May 5-8, 2002.

Received for publication May 8, 2002. Revisions requested July 8, 2002; revisions received Aug 1, 2002. Accepted for publication Aug 2, 2002. Address for reprints: Gordon Cohen, MD, PhD, Cardiothoracic Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom (E-mail: gordoncohen{at}yahoo.com).

Objective: The optimal treatment of pediatric empyema remains controversial. The objective of this study is to compare the use of conventional management versus primary thoracoscopic drainage and decortication in children with empyema.
Methods: Conventional management has consisted of chest drain insertion under general anesthesia plus intravenous antibiotics. Thoracoscopic drainage and decortication has consisted of primary thoracoscopic drainage and decortication plus antibiotics. The clinical course of 54 patients treated conventionally between 1989 and 1997 was compared with that of 21 patients treated by means of thoracoscopic drainage and decortication between September 2000 and September 2001.
Results: Results of the study demonstrated that patients in the drainage-decortication group had fewer invasive interventions per patient than those in the conventional management group (1.0 vs 1.26). Patients undergoing thoracoscopic drainage and decortication also had significantly shorter durations of intravenous antibiotic therapy (7.6 ± 1.2 vs 18.2 ± 7.5 days), chest tube drainage (4.0 ± 0.5 vs 10.2 ± 6.1 days), and hospital stays (7.4 ± 0.8 vs 15.4 ± 7.4). Moreover, there were no open thoracotomies and decortications in the thoracoscopic drainage and decortication group, whereas in the conventional management group 39% (21/54) of patients underwent an open procedure.
Conclusion: Although the 2 groups were not prospectively randomized and they were treated in different time periods, the results of this study support the use of thoracoscopic surgery as the primary therapeutic modality in children presenting with pleural empyema. This strategy appears to offer significant benefits over conventional treatment in terms of duration of treatment and the need for more invasive surgery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A Jaffe, A D Calder, C M Owens, S Stanojevic, and S Sonnappa Role of routine computed tomography in paediatric pleural empyema Thorax, October 1, 2008; 63(10): 897 - 902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Kurt, K. M. Winterhalter, R. H. Connors, B. W. Betz, and J. W. Winters Therapy of Parapneumonic Effusions in Children: Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Thoracostomy Drainage Pediatrics, September 1, 2006; 118(3): e547 - e553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Mattei and J. L. Allen Treatment of Empyema in Children: From Hippocrates' Time to the Present, and Back Again Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2006; 174(2): 110 - 111. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Sonnappa, G. Cohen, C. M. Owens, C. van Doorn, J. Cairns, S. Stanojevic, M. J. Elliott, and A. Jaffe Comparison of Urokinase and Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Treatment of Childhood Empyema Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2006; 174(2): 221 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. C. V Rodriguez and G. T Catalan Outcome of Pediatric Empyema Thoracis Managed by Tube Thoracostomy Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2006; 14(2): 98 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Bush How has research in the last five years changed my clinical practice? Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 832 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Avansino, B. Goldman, R. S. Sawin, and D. R. Flum Primary Operative Versus Nonoperative Therapy for Pediatric Empyema: A Meta-analysis Pediatrics, June 1, 2005; 115(6): 1652 - 1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I M Balfour-Lynn, E Abrahamson, G Cohen, J Hartley, S King, D Parikh, D Spencer, A H Thomson, D Urquhart, and on behalf of the Paediatric Pleural Diseases Subco BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection in children Thorax, February 1, 2005; 60(suppl_1): i1 - i21. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Wald, A. Mahajan, M. B. Kaplan, and J. B. Atkinson Experience with the Arndt paediatric bronchial blocker Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 92 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Jaffe and G Cohen Thoracic empyema Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 839 - 841. [Full Text] [PDF]