JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Hari R. Mallidi
Miguel Tamariz
George T. Christakis
Gopal Bhatnagar
Bernard S. Goldman
Stephen E. Fremes
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mallidi, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fremes, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mallidi, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fremes, S. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Myocardial protection

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:711-720
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology

The short-term and long-term effects of warm or tepid cardioplegia

Hari R. Mallidi, MD*, Jeri Sever, Miguel Tamariz, MD, Steve Singh, BSc, Naoji Hanayama, MD, George T. Christakis, MD, Gopal Bhatnagar, MD, Charles A. Cutrara, MD, Bernard S. Goldman, MD, Stephen E. Fremes, MD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Surgery of Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

*Supported in part by a partnership fellowship grant from the Medical Research Council and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.

Presented in part at the Seventy-third Annual Meeting of the American Heart Association, New Orleans, La, Nov 13-15, 2000.

Received for publication Aug 15, 2001. Revisions requested Jan 3, 2002; revisions received May 20, 2002. Accepted for publication Aug 15, 2002. Address for reprints: Stephen E. Fremes MD, Head, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sunnybrook and Women's College HSC, H405B2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5 (E-mail: stephen.fremes{at}swchsc.on.ca).

Background: Clinical studies of myocardial protection rarely identify differences in hard clinical outcomes after surgery, either early or late, because most trials lack sufficient statistical power to deal with low-frequency events.
Methods: Prospectively collected data concerning all isolated coronary bypass operations from November 1989 to February 2000 were analyzed to determine the effects of cold blood cardioplegia and warm or tepid blood cardioplegia on early and late outcomes after surgery. Warm blood cardioplegia was used in 4532 patients, whereas cold blood cardioplegia was used in 1532. The allocation of patients to receive warm blood cardioplegia and cold blood cardioplegia was random in 749 cases and according to surgeon preference in the remainder. Most patients in the cold blood cardioplegia group had surgery earlier in the time course of the study, and most in the warm blood cardioplegia group underwent surgery later.
Results: Perioperative death, myocardial infarction, and death or myocardial infarction were all more common in the cold blood cardioplegia group than in the warm blood cardioplegia group (death 2.5% vs 1.6%, P = .027, adjusted odds ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 0.95-2.22, P = .09; myocardial infarction 5.4% vs 2.4%, P < .0001, adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.36-2.53, P < .0001; death or myocardial infarction 7.3% vs. 3.8%, P < .0001, adjusted odds ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.30-2.21, P < .0001). Actuarial survival at 60 months was 91.1% ± 1.4% in the warm blood cardioplegia group and 89.9% ± 1.3% in the cold blood cardioplegia group (P = .09), whereas freedom from death or myocardial infarction was 84.7% ± 1.8% and 83.2% ± 1.6%, respectively (P = .16). In multivariate models, cold blood cardioplegia was associated with poorer survival (risk ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 0.96-1.75, P = .09) and freedom from any death or late myocardial infarction (risk ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.56-2.39, P = .0001).
Conclusions: In 6064 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, warm or tepid blood cardioplegia may be associated with better early and late event-free survivals than is cold cardioplegia.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. Ovrum, G. Tangen, S. Tollofsrud, R. Oystese, M. A. L. Ringdal, and R. Istad
Cold blood cardioplegia versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia: A prospective randomized study of 1440 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2004; 128(6): 860 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. B. Savage
Study of warm perfusion rather than cardioplegia
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 2111 - 2111.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.