JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Thomas W. Rice
Eugene H. Blackstone
Sudish C. Murthy
Malcolm M. DeCamp
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rice, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Goldblum, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rice, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Goldblum, J. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esophagus - cancer

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1103-1113
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


General Thoracic Surgery

Refining esophageal cancer staging

Thomas W. Rice, MDa, Eugene H. Blackstone, MDa,b, Lisa A. Rybicki, MSb, David J. Adelstein, MDc, Sudish C. Murthy, MD, PhDa, Malcolm M. DeCamp, MDa, John R. Goldblum, MDd

From The Center for Swallowing and Esophageal Disorders, Departments of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,a Biostatistics and Epidemiology,b Hematology and Medical Oncology,c and Anatomic Pathology,d The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Read at the Eighty-second Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Washington, DC, May 5-8, 2002.

Received for publication April 23, 2002. Revisions requested July 8, 2002; revisions received Aug 1, 2002. Accepted for publication Aug 15, 2002. Address for reprints: Thomas W. Rice, MD, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave/Desk F25, Cleveland, OH 44195 (E-mail: ricet{at}ccf.org).

Objective: Cancer staging is dynamic, reflecting accrual of knowledge and experience in treatment. The objectives of this study were to assess current esophageal cancer staging and to determine whether refinements of classification and stage grouping are necessary.
Methods: From 1983 through November 2000, 480 patients underwent esophagectomy without induction therapy. Depth of tumor invasion (T), regional lymph node status (N), distant status (M), number of metastatic regional lymph nodes, and histopathologic type and grade were subjected to survival-tree analysis, multivariable Cox and hazard function analysis, and residual misclassification risk analysis.
Results: Inhomogenity of survival was found within and lack of distinction was found between current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging groups, supporting the need for refinement. T1 and N1 were redefined on the basis of survival differences. T1a is intramucosal cancer, T1b is submucosal cancer (P = .008), N1 is 1 or 2 metastatic regional lymph nodes, and N2 is 3 or more metastatic regional lymph nodes (P = .01). Current subclassification of M1 is not warranted (P = .9). Histopathologic type (P = .17) and grade (P = .3) minimally refined staging. Reassignment of staging groups constrained by American Joint Committee on Cancer definitions of stages 0 and IV produced less monotonic, distinctive, and homogeneous survival than free assignment of staging groups.
Conclusions: Current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging of esophageal cancer is inadequate. Refinement requires redefinition of T1, N1, and M1 classifications. Stage grouping within the constraints of American Joint Committee on Cancer definitions produces less accurate prognosis than free assignment based on survival data.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. K. Veeramachaneni, J. B. Zoole, P. A. Decker, J. B. Putnam Jr, and B. F. Meyers
Lymph node analysis in esophageal resection: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 418 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. S. Lee, S.-B. Kim, S.-I. Park, Y. H. Kim, J.-S. Ryu, H.-Y. Song, J. H. Shin, H. Y. Jung, G. H. Lee, K. D. Choi, et al.
Capecitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy (XP) Alone or Sequentially Combined Chemoradiotherapy Containing XP Regimen in Patients with Three Different Settings of Stage IV Esophageal Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 37(11): 829 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. Hofstetter, A. M. Correa, N. Bekele, J. A. Ajani, A. Phan, R. R. Komaki, Z. Liao, D. Maru, T. T. Wu, R. J. Mehran, et al.
Proposed Modification of Nodal Status in AJCC Esophageal Cancer Staging System
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 84(2): 365 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. G. Izzo, U. Malhotra, T.-T. Wu, R. Luthra, A. M. Correa, S. G. Swisher, W. Hofstetter, K.S. C. Chao, M.-C. Hung, and J. A. Ajani
Clinical Biology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma after Surgery Is Influenced by Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Expression
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1200 - 1205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. K. Dhar, S. Hattori, Y. Tonomoto, T. Shimoda, H. Kato, M. Tachibana, K. Matsuura, Y. Mitsumoto, A. G. Little, and N. Nagasue
Appraisal of a Revised Lymph Node Classification System for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1265 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. A. Ajani
New Proposal for Postsurgery Pathologic Staging of Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Why Bother?
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2007; 25(7): 906 - 907.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Pedrazzani, G. de Manzoni, D. Marrelli, and F. Roviello
It Is Time for a Proper Staging System for Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2007; 25(7): 907 - 908.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. W. Rice, D. P. Mason, S. C. Murthy, G. Zuccaro Jr, D. J. Adelstein, L. A. Rybicki, and E. H. Blackstone
T2N0M0 esophageal cancer
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 317 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. Rizk, E. Venkatraman, B. Park, R. Flores, M. S. Bains, and V. Rusch
The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: Implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2006; 132(6): 1374 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. M. Lagarde, F. J.W. ten Kate, J. B. Reitsma, O. R.C. Busch, and J. J. B. van Lanschot
Prognostic Factors in Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2006; 24(26): 4347 - 4355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. A. Waterman, J. A. Hagen, J. H. Peters, S. R. DeMeester, C. R. Taylor, and T. R. DeMeester
The Prognostic Importance of Immunohistochemically Detected Node Metastases in Resected Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 78(4): 1161 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.