JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, D.C.H.
Right arrow Articles by Vuylsteke, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, D.C.H.
Right arrow Articles by Vuylsteke, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - pharmacology

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:79-86
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Cardiopulmonary support and physiology

A phase II dose-response study of hemoglobin raffimer (Hemolink) in elective coronary artery bypass surgery

D.C.H. Cheng, MD, MSc, FRCPCa,*, C. D. Mazer, MD, FRCPCb, R. Martineau, MDc, A. Ralph-Edwards, BSc, MD, FRCSC, FACSd, J. Karski, MDd, J. Robblee, BSc, MBA, MD, FRCPCe, B. Finegan, MB, FFARCS(I), FRCPCf, R. I. Hall, BScPharm, MD, FRCPC, FCCPg, R. Latimer, MA, MBBS, LRCP, MRCS, FRCAh, A. Vuylsteke, MDh

a London Health Sciences Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
b St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
c Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
d Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
e University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
f University of Alberta Hospitals, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
g Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
h Papworth Hospital, Papworth, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Received for publication December 10, 2002; revisions received August 25, 2003; accepted for publication August 25, 2003.

* Address for reprints: Davy Cheng, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Center, 339 Windermere Rd, 3-CA 19, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5A5
davy.cheng{at}uwo.ca

BACKGROUND: We performed this study to determine the dose-response of hemoglobin raffimer administered in conjunction with intraoperative autologous donation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. A secondary objective was to evaluate hemoglobin raffimer for reducing the incidence of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions.

METHODS: This was a phase II, single-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, open-label study. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass and intraoperative autologous donation were randomized to receive a single dose of hemoglobin raffimer or control (10% pentastarch). Patients were sequentially enrolled in a dose block of 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mL.

RESULTS: Sixty patients received hemoglobin raffimer (n = 30) or control (n = 30). Hemoglobin raffimer was well tolerated. Most (98%) adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. There was an expected dose-dependent increase in the incidence of blood pressure increases and jaundice in hemoglobin raffimer–treated patients. In a dose-pooled analysis of hemoglobin raffimer versus control, increased blood pressure (43% vs 17%), nausea (37% vs 33%), and atrial fibrillation (37% vs 17%) were the most frequently reported adverse events. All serious adverse events were considered unrelated or unlikely to be related to study drug. No hemoglobin raffimer–treated patient required an intraoperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion, compared with 5 (17%) pentastarch-treated patients (P = .052). This advantage of hemoglobin raffimer was maintained at 24 hours after surgery (7% vs 37%; P = .010) and up to 5 days after surgery (10% vs 47%; P = .0034).

CONCLUSIONS: Hemoglobin raffimer was not associated with any serious adverse events in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass and intraoperative autologous donation in a dose-response study up to 1000 mL. Hemoglobin raffimer was effective in facilitating decreased exposure or avoidance of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions when used in conjunction with intraoperative autologous donation.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservatio, V. A. Ferraris, S. P. Ferraris, S. P. Saha, E. A. Hessel II, C. K. Haan, B. D. Royston, C. R. Bridges, R. S.D. Higgins, G. Despotis, et al.
Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5_Supplement): S27 - S86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
G. M.T. Hare, A. Harrington, E. Liu, J. L. Wang, A. J. Baker, and C. D. Mazer
Effect of oxygen affinity and molecular weight of HBOCs on cerebral oxygenation and blood pressure in rats: [L'effet de l'affinite pour l'oxygene et du poids moleculaire des TOBH sur l'oxygenation et la tension arterielle chez les rats].
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2006; 53(10): 1030 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
R. I. Hall
The utility of hemoglobin based oxygen carriers (HBOC) - can animal studies help?/L'utilite des transporteurs d'oxygene a base d'hemoglobine (HBOC) - les etudes animales peuventelles aider ?
Can J Anesth, November 1, 2005; 52(9): 895 - 898.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.