|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1366-1372
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
General thoracic surgery |
a Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
b The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex,USA
c Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA,
d The University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Received for publication September 23, 2003; revisions received November 13, 2003; revisions received November 20, 2003; accepted for publication November 20, 2003.
* Address for reprints: Geoffrey A. Porter, MD, Department of Surgery, 7-007 QEII Health Sciences Center, Dalhousie University, 1278 Tower Rd, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 2Y9
Geoff.Porter{at}dal.ca
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies for patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma.
METHODS: We constructed a decision tree to model the outcomes of 4 treatment strategies for patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma: pulmonary resection, systemic chemotherapy, pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy, and no treatment. Data from 1124 patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma were used to estimate disease-specific survival for pulmonary resection and no treatment. Outcomes of systemic chemotherapy and pulmonary resection and of systemic chemotherapy were estimated by assuming a 12-month improvement in disease-specific survival with chemotherapy; this was done on the basis of the widely held but unproven assumption that chemotherapy provides a survival benefit in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Direct costs were examined for a series of patients who underwent protocol-based pulmonary resection or doxorubicin/ifosfamide-based chemotherapy.
RESULTS: The mean cost of pulmonary resection was $20,339 per patient; the mean cost of 6 cycles of chemotherapy was $99,033. Compared with no treatment and assuming a 12-month survival advantage with chemotherapy, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $14,357 per life-year gained for pulmonary resection, $104,210 per life-year gained for systemic chemotherapy, and $51,159 per life-year gained for pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy. Compared with pulmonary resection, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy was $108,036 per life-year gained. Sensitivity analyses showed that certain patient and tumor features, as well as the assumed benefit of chemotherapy, affected cost-effectiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma who were surgical candidates, pulmonary resection was the most cost-effective treatment strategy evaluated. Even with favorable assumptions regarding its clinical benefit, systemic chemotherapy alone, compared with no treatment, was not a cost-effective treatment strategy for these patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Rehders, S. B. Hosch, P. Scheunemann, N. H. Stoecklein, W. T. Knoefel, and M. Peiper Benefit of Surgical Treatment of Lung Metastasis in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Arch Surg, January 1, 2007; 142(1): 70 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |