JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Guo-Wei He
Anthony P. C. Yim
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, G.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, R.-Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by He, G.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, R.-Z.
Related Collections
Right arrow Myocardial protection

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1773-1780
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Cardiopulmonary support and physiology

Electrophysiologic and mechanical evidence of superiority of hyperpolarizing versus depolarizing cardioplegia in protection of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor–mediated endothelial function: A study in coronary resistance arteries

Guo-Wei He, MD, PhD, DSca,b,c,*, Zhi-Dong Ge, MD, PhD*, Anthony P. C. Yim, MDa, Qin Yang, MD, PhDa,c, Rong-Zheng Zhang, MDa

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
b Wuhan Heart Institute, Wuhan Central Hospital, Wuhan, China
c Providence Heart Institute, Albert Starr Academic Center, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore, USA

Received for publication May 14, 2003; revisions received August 24, 2003; accepted for publication September 29, 2003.

* Address for reprints: Professor Guo-Wei He, MD, PhD, DSc, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Block B, 5A, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
gwhe{at}surgery.cuhk.edu.hk

OBJECTIVE: The advantages of hyperpolarizing cardioplegia with potassium-channel openers versus depolarizing cardioplegia have been suggested but not demonstrated in coronary microarteries. This study examined the simultaneous electric and tonic alteration of coronary microarteries at the cellular level during and after exposure to depolarizing cardioplegia or hyperpolarizing cardioplegia, with emphasis on endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor–mediated relaxation and hyperpolarization.

METHODS: Porcine coronary microarteries (diameter, approximately 200-400 µm) were incubated with depolarizing cardioplegia (20 mmol/L KCl) or hyperpolarizing cardioplegia (10 µmol/L aprikalim) for 1 hour. Cellular membrane potential with a glass microelectrode in a coronary smooth muscle cell and isometric force of the muscle were simultaneously measured in a myograph.

RESULTS: Depolarizing cardioplegia incubation produced a stable contraction (from 4.9 ± 0.3 mN to 7.3 ± 0.4 mN) and depolarization (from –51 ± 1 mV to –41 ± 2 mV). In contrast, hyperpolarizing cardioplegia relaxed (from 4.8 ± 0.3 mN to 3.5 ± 0.3 mN) and hyperpolarized (from –51 ± 2 mV to –56 ± 1 mV) the smooth muscle. After exposure to depolarizing cardioplegia, the bradykinin-induced, endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor–mediated relaxation reduced from 66.2% ± 5.0% to 18.4% ± 3.7% (P < .001), and the membrane hyperpolarization reduced from 18 ± 1 mV to 7 ± 1 mV (P < .001) in the presence of indomethacin and NG-nitro-L-arginine. In contrast, hyperpolarizing cardioplegia did not affect the bradykinin-induced responses.

CONCLUSIONS: In the coronary microarteries, exposure to hyperpolarizing cardioplegia preserves whereas depolarizing cardioplegia reduces the endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor–mediated electric (hyperpolarization) and mechanical (relaxation) responses. Thus hyperpolarizing cardioplegia is superior to depolarizing cardioplegia in protecting the endothelial function in the coronary microcirculation.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Sun, A. Huang, and G. Kaley
Mechanical compression elicits NO-dependent increases in coronary flow
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2454 - H2460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.