JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ganesh S. Kumpati
Eugene H. Blackstone
James B. Young
Randall C. Starling
Nicholas G. Smedira
Patrick M. McCarthy
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumpati, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kumpati, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, P. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1800-1807
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Cardiothoracic transplantation

HLA sensitization in ventricular assist device recipients: Does type of device make a difference?

Ganesh S. Kumpati, MDa, Daniel J. Cook, PhDb, Eugene H. Blackstone, MDa,c, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, MScc, Ashraf S. Abdo, MBBSb, James B. Young, MDd, Randall C. Starling, MD, MPHd, Nicholas G. Smedira, MDa, Patrick M. McCarthy, MDa,*

a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
b Allogen Labora-tory, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
c Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology,, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
d Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Presented at the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Vancouver, Canada, April 25-29, 2001, and the Transplant 2001 Meeting (joint meeting of the American Society of Transplantation/American Society of Transplant Surgeons), Chicago, Ill, May 12-16, 2001.

Received for publication July 23, 2003; revisions received December 2, 2003; revisions received January 21, 2004; accepted for publication January 27, 2004.

* Address for reprints: Patrick M. McCarthy, MD, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk F25, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
mccartp{at}ccf.org

BACKGROUND: We sought to (1) characterize the temporal pattern of T-cell panel reactive antibody during ventricular assist device support, (2) identify predictors of higher T-cell panel reactive antibody during ventricular assist device support, and (3) determine whether device type remained a predictor after accounting for nonrandom device selection.

METHODS: Between December 1991 and August 2000, 239 patients received implantable ventricular assist devices, of whom 231 had T-cell panel reactive antibody measured. Panel reactive antibody was measured before implantation of the assist device, approximately 2 weeks after device implantation, irregularly thereafter depending on clinical events and length of support, and at transplantation. Longitudinal mixed modeling was used to characterize the temporal pattern of sensitization and its predictors during ventricular assist device support. To account for nonrandom factors in device selection when comparing HeartMate (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc, Woburn, Mass) and Novacor (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Novacor Div, Oakland, Calif) devices, we propensity-matched patients according to baseline characteristics.

RESULTS: T-cell panel reactive antibody increased rapidly after implantation of the ventricular assist device and then immediately began to decrease. Predictors of higher T-cell panel reactive antibody during support with the assist device were a shorter interval from device implantation to T-cell panel reactive antibody measurement (P < .0001), female sex (P = .0004), younger age (P = .01), higher T-cell panel reactive antibody before device implantation (P = .03), more perioperative red blood cell transfusions (P = .006), and an earlier date of device implantation (P = .001). In matched patients, device type was not a predictor of higher T-cell panel reactive antibody during ventricular assist device support (P = .8).

CONCLUSIONS: HLA sensitization during ventricular assist device support is not constant but increases rapidly at implantation and then decreases. This temporal pattern of sensitization is influenced by patient factors and not by the type of device.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
L. Kirsch, T. Timmermans, O. Van Caenegem, O. Gurne, P. Noirhomme, L.-M. Jacquet, D. Latinne, and A. J. Poncelet
Allosensitization in bridge to transplant Novacor left ventricular assist device patients: analysis of long-term outcomes with regard to acute rejection and chronic allograft vasculopathy.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 34(2): 268 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Xu, J. Yan, Y. Huang, P. M. Chilton, C. Ding, C. L. Schanie, L. Wang, and S. T. Ildstad
Costimulatory blockade of CD154-CD40 in combination with T-cell lymphodepletion results in prevention of allogeneic sensitization
Blood, March 15, 2008; 111(6): 3266 - 3275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. U. Nwakanma, J. A. Williams, E. S. Weiss, S. D. Russell, W. A. Baumgartner, and J. V. Conte
Influence of Pretransplant Panel-Reactive Antibody on Outcomes in 8,160 Heart Transplant Recipients in Recent Era
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1556 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. C. Austin
Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2007; 134(5): 1128 - 1135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. G. Drakos, J. C. Stringham, J. W. Long, E. M. Gilbert, T. C. Fuller, B. K. Campbell, B. D. Horne, M. E. Hagan, K. E. Nelson, J. M. Lindblom, et al.
Prevalence and risks of allosensitization in HeartMate left ventricular assist device recipients: The impact of leukofiltered cellular blood product transfusions
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1612 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.-M. Grinda, M.-O. Bricourt, C. Amrein, S. Salvi, R. Guillemain, A. Francois, P. Guibourt, A. Deloche, and J.-N. Fabiani
Human Leukocyte Antigen Sensitization in Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Lesser Risk With the DeBakey Axial Pump
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 945 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.