HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Remadi, J.P. Articles by Tribouilloy, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Remadi, J.P. Articles by Tribouilloy, C. Related Collections Valve disease

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:436-441
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Surgery for acquired cardiovascular disease

Aortic valve replacement with the minimal extracorporeal circulation (Jostra MECC System) versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomized prospective trial

^a Cardiovascular Surgery Unit and Anaesthesiology Department, South Hospital, Amiens, France

Received for publication October 9, 2003; revisions received January 4, 2004; accepted for publication January 27, 2004.

^* Address for reprints: J. P. Remadi, MD, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Unit, South Hospital, 80054 Amiens Cedex 1, France
remadi.jean-paul{at}chu-amiens.fr

BACKGROUND: We prospectively evaluated a newly introduced minimal extracorporeal circulation system (Jostra MECC System; Jostra AG, Hirrlingen, Germany) for aortic valve surgery.

METHOD: In a prospective, randomized study, 100 patients underwent aortic valve replacement either with standard cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 50, group B) or with the MECC System (n = 50, group B). The myocardial protection and the left vent were identical for the two groups. The intrapericardial suction device was never used (only the cell salvage device was used) to reduce the air-blood contact area.

RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in patient characteristics and operative data between groups. Operative mortality (<30 days) was 2% for group A and 4% for group B (difference not significant). From the preoperative period to the postoperative period, the increase in C-reactive protein was significantly higher for group B (P < .001). The postoperative troponin I level was significantly lower in group A (mean 4.65 ± 2.9 µg/L at 24 hours) than in group B (8.2 ± 4.4 µg/L, P < .03). On the other hand, the MECC System was associated with platelet preservation. Renal function was better preserved and the neurologic event rate was significantly lower for the MECC group (P < .02).

CONCLUSION: The MECC System is safe and allows aortic valve replacement under the most favorable conditions. The system is more biocompatible than standard cardiopulmonary bypass and provides a good postoperative biologic profile and good clinical results, particularly for high-risk patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T Kofidis, H Baraki, H Singh, H Kamiya, M Winterhalter, V Didilis, M Emmert, F Woitek, A Haverich, and U Klima The minimized extracorporeal circulation system causes less inflammation and organ damage Perfusion, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 147 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Mazzei, G. Nasso, G. Salamone, F. Castorino, A. Tommasini, and A. Anselmi Prospective Randomized Comparison of Coronary Bypass Grafting With Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation System (MECC) Versus Off-Pump Coronary Surgery Circulation, October 16, 2007; 116(16): 1761 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservatio, V. A. Ferraris, S. P. Ferraris, S. P. Saha, E. A. Hessel II, C. K. Haan, B. D. Royston, C. R. Bridges, R. S.D. Higgins, G. Despotis, et al. Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5_Supplement): S27 - S86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Glauber, A. Farneti, S. Bevilacqua, and J. Karimov Pump-assisted beating heart surgery MMCTS, February 19, 2007; 2007(0219): 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Castiglioni, A. Verzini, F. Pappalardo, N. Colangelo, L. Torracca, A. Zangrillo, and O. Alfieri Minimally Invasive Closed Circuit Versus Standard Extracorporeal Circulation for Aortic Valve Replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): 586 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kamiya, T. Kofidis, A. Haverich, and U. Klima Preliminary experience with the mini-extracorporeal circulation system (Medtronic resting heart system) Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2006; 5(6): 680 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Beghi, F. Nicolini, A. Agostinelli, B. Borrello, A. M. Budillon, F. Bacciottini, M. Friggeri, A. Costa, L. Belli, L. Battistelli, et al. Mini-Cardiopulmonary Bypass System: Results of a Prospective Randomized Study Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1396 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]