HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Michael A. Wait Dan M. Meyer Michael E. Jessen W. Steves Ring Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wheatley, G. H. Articles by DiMaio, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wheatley, G. H., III Articles by DiMaio, J. M.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:464-468
© 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Evolving Technology

Improved pain management outcomes with continuous infusion of a local anesthetic after thoracotomy

^a Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex
^b I-Flow Corporation, Lake Forest, Calif.

Presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Ill, October 2003.

Received for publication October 22, 2004; revisions received January 20, 2005; accepted for publication February 10, 2005.

^_* Address for reprints: J. Michael DiMaio, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-8879. (Email: michael.dimaio{at}utsouthwestern.edu).

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the effectiveness of an incisional infusion of local anesthetics through a continuous-infusion elastomeric pump for the management of postoperative pain after thoracotomy.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparative analysis of 110 patients undergoing thoracotomies between November 1999 and March 2003. Postoperative pain management with a continuous-infusion elastomeric pump providing local anesthetic into the incisional area was compared with a single-shot epidural in combination with continuous local anesthetic infusion and continuous thoracic epidural infusion. Data sources were reviewed for mean narcotic use, pain score, and complications.

RESULTS: After thoracotomy procedures, 38 patients received the ON-Q Pain Relief System (I-Flow Corp, Lake Forest, Calif), 32 received the ON-Q device and single-shot epidural infusion, and 40 received continuous epidural infusion. Demographic attributes, including age, body mass index, and sex were similar between the groups. Preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists status was significantly higher in the ON-Q group compared with that in the other groups (P = .02). Narcotic use and pain scores were significantly reduced in the ON-Q group compared with that in the epidural group at all time points (P < .001). There were no wound-healing complications or infections associated with the use of the pump.

CONCLUSION: A continuous infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine at 4 mL/h through the ON-Q elastomeric infusion pump is a safe and effective adjunct in postoperative pain management after thoracotomy. The use of the ON-Q Pain Relief System results in decreased narcotic use and lower pain scores compared with continuous epidural infusion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Blechman and M. Zervos Post-thoracotomy Horner syndrome associated with extrapleural infusion of local anesthetic Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2009; 9(2): 309 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Garutti, F. Gonzalez-Aragoneses, M. T. Biencinto, E. Novoa, C. Simon, N. Moreno, P. Cruz, and C. Benito Thoracic paravertebral block after thoracotomy: comparison of three different approaches Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 35(5): 829 - 832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K.-M. Chiu, C.-C. Wu, M.-J. Wang, C.-W. Lu, J.-S. Shieh, T.-Y. Lin, and S.-H. Chu Local infusion of bupivacaine combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia provides better pain relief than intravenous patient-controlled analgesia alone in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2008; 135(6): 1348 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]