JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Nishant D. Patel
Christopher J. Barreiro
Pramod N. Bonde
Michele M. Waldron
John V. Conte
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, N. D.
Right arrow Articles by Conte, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, N. D.
Right arrow Articles by Conte, J. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive Heart Failure
Right arrow Transplantation - heart

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1698-1706
© 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Surgical ventricular remodeling for multiterritory myocardial infarction: Defining a new patient population

Nishant D. Patel, BA a , Jason A. Williams, MD a , Christopher J. Barreiro, MD a , Pramod N. Bonde, MD, FRCS a , Michele M. Waldron, MT, RN, CCRP a , David C. Chang, PhD a , David A. Bluemke, MD, PhD b , John V. Conte, MD a , *

a Divisions of Cardiac Surgery
b Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md

Read at the Eighty-fifth Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, San Francisco, Calif, April 10-13, 2005.

Received for publication April 13, 2005; revisions received August 12, 2005; accepted for publication August 17, 2005.

* Address for reprints: John V. Conte, MD, Director of Heart and Lung Transplantation, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Division of Cardiac Surgery, 600 North Wolfe St, Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD 21287-4618 (Email: jconte{at}csurg.jhmi.jhu.edu).

OBJECTIVE: Because of limited medical and surgical options for patients with end-stage congestive heart failure, we expanded the criteria for surgical ventricular remodeling to include patients with multiterritory myocardial infarction, a group historically considered high-risk candidates. We present our series of patients with multiterritory myocardial infarction who underwent surgical ventricular remodeling and propose a new patient population who may benefit from this procedure.

METHODS: Data were analyzed for 51 consecutive patients undergoing surgical ventricular remodeling from January 2002 to June 2004, with 100% follow-up. Three left ventricular vascular territories were defined: anteroapicoseptal (left anterior descending), lateral (circumflex), and inferior (right coronary artery). Infarction was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings.

RESULTS: Multiterritory myocardial infarction was found in 64.7% of patients (33/51) undergoing surgical ventricular remodeling. Mean age was 61.6 ± 11.1 years (range 40-81 years). Sixty-one percent (20/33) demonstrated evidence of myocardial infarction in all three territories. Five patients underwent concomitant mitral valve repair or replacement. Operative mortality was 6.1% (2/33) and did not differ from that of patients with single-territory infarction (11.1%, P = .61). Surgical ventricular remodeling significantly improved left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with multiterritory myocardial infarction. Three patients required assist device implantation, and 2 patients required defibrillator placement. Sixty-nine percent of patients in preoperative New York Heart Association functional class III or IV (22/32) had improvement to class I or II at follow-up (P < .01). Cox regression analysis discriminated a preoperative left ventricular end-systolic volume index greater than 100 mL/m2 as a significant risk factor for mortality (odds ratio 12.1, 95% confidence interval 1.27-114.51, P = .03). Thirty-month survival of patients with multiterritory myocardial infarction (73.5% ± 8.3%) did not differ statistically from that of patients with single-territory infarction (n = 18).

CONCLUSION: Surgical ventricular remodeling improves cardiac function and New York Heart Association functional status in patients with multiterritory myocardial infarction. Our initial results are promising and should prompt further studies to confirm our results and potentially expand the surgical ventricular remodeling inclusion criteria to include patients with multiterritory myocardial infarction.



Abbreviations and Acronyms CHF = congestive heart failure; EF = ejection fraction; IABP = intra-aortic balloon pump; LVAD = left ventricular assist device; LVESVI = left ventricular end-systolic volume index; LVEDVI = left ventricular end-diastolic volume index; MI = myocardial infarction; MR = mitral regurgitation; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; MTI = multiterritory myocardial infarction; NYHA = New York Heart Association; POD = postoperative day; RESTORE = Reconstructive Endovascular Surgery returning Torsion Original Radius Elliptical shape; STI = single-territory myocardial infarction; SVR = surgical ventricular remodeling





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. Takeda, G. Matsumiya, H. Matsue, S. Hamada, M. Sakaki, T. Sakaguchi, T. Fujita, and Y. Sawa
Use of quantitative analysis of remote myocardial fibrosis with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging to predict outcomes after surgical ventricular restoration for ischemic cardiomyopathy.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2008; 136(6): 1514 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. B. Prucz, E. S. Weiss, N. D. Patel, L. U. Nwakanma, A. S. Shah, and J. V. Conte
The Impact of Surgical Ventricular Restoration on Mitral Valve Regurgitation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 726 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. B. Prucz, E. S. Weiss, N. D. Patel, L. U. Nwakanma, W. A. Baumgartner, and J. V. Conte
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With or Without Surgical Ventricular Restoration: A Comparison
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 806 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. D. Patel, L. U. Nwakanma, E. S. Weiss, J. A. Williams, and J. V. Conte
Impact of Septal Myocardial Infarction on Outcomes After Surgical Ventricular Restoration
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 135 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
L. U. Nwakanma, A. S. Shah, J. V. Conte, and W. A. Baumgartner
Heart Transplantation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1539 - 1578.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. D. Patel, J. A. Williams, L. U. Nwakanma, E. S. Weiss, and J. V. Conte
Impact of Lateral Wall Myocardial Infarction on Outcomes After Surgical Ventricular Restoration
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2017 - 2028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. D. Patel, J. A. Williams, L. U. Nwakanma, M. M. Waldron, D. A. Bluemke, and J. V. Conte
Surgical ventricular restoration for advanced congestive heart failure: should pulmonary hypertension be a contraindication?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 879 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.