|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1036-1044
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
a Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
b Department of Epidemiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
c Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Received for publication August 1, 2005; revisions received October 13, 2005; accepted for publication October 20, 2005. * Address for reprints: Marc Ruel, MD, MPH, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin St, Suite 3403, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4W7 (Email: mruel{at}ottawaheart.ca).
OBJECTIVE: The effect of prosthesispatient mismatch on clinical outcome and left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement remains controversial. Data on whether the clinical effect of prosthesispatient mismatch depends on left ventricular function at the time of aortic valve replacement are lacking. This study examined the long-term clinical and echocardiographic effects of prosthesispatient mismatch in patients with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction at the time of aortic valve replacement.
METHODS: Preoperative and serial postoperative echocardiograms were performed in 805 adults who underwent aortic valve replacement between 1990 and 2003 and who were subsequently followed up in a dedicated valve clinic (follow-up, mean ± SD, 5.5 ± 3.5 years; maximum, 14.2 years). Preoperative left ventricular function was defined as normal (ejection fraction
50%) in 548 patients and impaired (ejection fraction <50%) in 257 patients.
RESULTS: Patients with impaired preoperative left ventricular function and prosthesispatient mismatch (indexed effective orifice area
0.85 cm2/m2) had a decreased overall late survival (hazard ratio, 2.8; P = .03), decreased freedom from heart failure symptoms or heart failure death (odds ratio of 5.1 at 3 years after aortic valve replacement; P = .009), and diminished left ventricular mass regression compared with patients with impaired preoperative left ventricular function and no prosthesispatient mismatch. These effects of prosthesispatient mismatch were not observed in patients with normal preoperative left ventricular function.
CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesispatient mismatch at an indexed effective orifice area of 0.85 cm2/m2 or less after aortic valve replacement primarily affects patients with impaired preoperative left ventricular function and results in decreased survival, lower freedom from heart failure, and incomplete left ventricular mass regression. Patients with impaired left ventricular function represent a critical population in whom prosthesispatient mismatch should be avoided at the time of aortic valve replacement.
Related Article
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006 131: 952-955.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Mannacio, L. Di Tommaso, P. Stassano, V. De Amicis, and C. Vosa Myocardial metabolism and diastolic function after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: influence of patient-prosthesis mismatch Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, February 1, 2012; 41(2): 316 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Elmistekawy, V. Chan, M. E. Bourke, J.-Y. Dupuis, F. D. Rubens, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting does not preserve renal function better than on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Results of a case-matched study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2012; 143(1): 85 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. El-Hamamsy, M. Ibrahim, L.-M. Stevens, H. Witzke, L. Clark, and M. H. Yacoub Early and long-term results of reoperative total aortic root replacement with reimplantation of the coronary arteries J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2011; 142(6): 1473 - 1477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ali, A. Patel, Z. Ali, Y. Abu-Omar, A. Saeed, T. Athanasiou, and J. Pepper Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term survival J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2011; 142(2): 285 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Coutinho, P. M. Correia, G. Pauperio, F. de Oliveira, and M. J. Antunes Aortic root enlargement does not increase the surgical risk and short-term patient outcome? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, August 1, 2011; 40(2): 441 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nozohoor, J. Sjogren, T. Ivert, P. Hoglund, and J. Nilsson Validation of a modified EuroSCORE risk stratification model for cardiac surgery: the Swedish experience Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, July 1, 2011; 40(1): 185 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Chambers and J.-L. Vanoverschelde Chapter 15 Replacement heart valves The EAE Textbook of Echocardiography, March 1, 2011; 1(1): med-9780199599639-chapter - med-9780199599639-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Clavel, J. G. Webb, J. Rodes-Cabau, J. B. Masson, E. Dumont, R. De Larochelliere, D. Doyle, S. Bergeron, H. Baumgartner, I. G. Burwash, et al. Comparison Between Transcatheter and Surgical Prosthetic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Circulation, November 9, 2010; 122(19): 1928 - 1936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Unger, J. Magne, F. V. Eynden, D. Plein, G. Van Camp, A. Pasquet, B. Cosyns, C. Dedobbeleer, and P. Lancellotti Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement Heart, October 15, 2010; 96(20): 1627 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Chan, A. Kulik, A. Tran, P. Hendry, R. Masters, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel Long-Term Clinical and Hemodynamic Performance of the Hancock II Versus the Perimount Aortic Bioprostheses Circulation, September 14, 2010; 122(11_suppl_1): S10 - S16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kulik Aortic Root Enlargement: Worth the Effort? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2010; 90(3): 703 - 705. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sakamoto, M. Yoshitake, H. Naganuma, N. Kawada, K. Kinouchi, and K. Hashimoto Reconsideration of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Definition From the Valve Indexed Effective Orifice Area Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2010; 89(6): 1951 - 1955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bleiziffer, A. Ali, I. M. Hettich, D. Akdere, R. P. Laubender, D. Ruzicka, J. Boehm, R. Lange, and W. Eichinger Impact of the indexed effective orifice area on mid-term cardiac-related mortality after aortic valve replacement Heart, June 1, 2010; 96(11): 865 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jilaihawi, D. Chin, T. Spyt, M. Jeilan, M. Vasa-Nicotera, J. Bence, E. Logtens, and J. Kovac Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-Corevalve bioprosthesis Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2010; 31(7): 857 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Vohra, R. N. Whistance, M. Bolgeri, T. Velissaris, G. M. K. Tsang, C. W. Barlow, and S. K. Ohri Mid-term evaluation of Sorin Soprano bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic annulus <=20 mm Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, March 1, 2010; 10(3): 399 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.R. E. Jamieson, J. Ye, J. Higgins, A. Cheung, G. J. Fradet, P. Skarsgard, E. Germann, F. Chan, and S. V. Lichtenstein Effect of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Long-Term Survival With Aortic Valve Replacement: Assessment to 15 Years Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2010; 89(1): 51 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Alvarez, J. S. Quiroga, M. V. Fernandez, B. A. Nazar, F. G. Sampedro, J. M. Martinez Comendador, J. M. Martinez Cereijo, and M. T. Alves Perez Up to twenty-five-year survival after aortic valve replacement with size 19 mm valves Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, January 1, 2010; 10(1): 32 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nozohoor, J. Nilsson, C. Luhrs, A. Roijer, and J. Sjogren Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular remodelling in severe aortic insufficiency Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2010; 37(1): 133 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Suri, K. J. Zehr, T. M. Sundt III, J. A. Dearani, R. C. Daly, J. K. Oh, and H. V. Schaff Left Ventricular Mass Regression After Porcine Versus Bovine Aortic Valve Replacement: A Randomized Comparison Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1232 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. A. Mannacio, V. De Amicis, L. Di Tommaso, F. Iorio, and C. Vosa Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on exercise-induced arrhythmias: A further aspect after aortic valve replacement J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2009; 138(3): 632 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Price, H. Lapierre, L. Ressler, B.-K. Lam, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel Prosthesis-patient mismatch is less frequent and more clinically indolent in patients operated for aortic insufficiency J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2009; 138(3): 639 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Cattaneo, M. Baravelli, A. Rossi, G. Mariscalco, M. Romano, D. Imperiale, A. Bregasi, and C. Anza Ejection Fraction/Velocity Ratio Identifies Prosthesis-Patient Mismatches in Patients With Aortic Bioprosthetic Valves and Left Ventricular Dysfunction J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2009; 28(9): 1167 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kulik, N. T. Kouchoukos, and M. Ruel Avoiding Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in the Elderly: Options Other Than Mechanical Prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 88(3): 1049 - 1050. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Urso, R. Sadaba, and G. Aldamiz-Echevarria Is patient-prosthesis mismatch an independent risk factor for early and mid-term overall mortality in adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, September 1, 2009; 9(3): 510 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Monin Prosthesis-patient mismatch: myth or reality? Heart, June 1, 2009; 95(11): 948 - 952. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.R. E. Jamieson, E. Germann, J. Ye, F. Chan, A. Cheung, J. S. MacNab, G. J. Fradet, E. A. Stanford, L. A. Bryson, and S. V. Lichtenstein Effect of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Long-Term Survival With Mitral Valve Replacement: Assessment to 15 Years Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1135 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J G Dumesnil, J Magne, N Girerd, and P Pibarot Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch can impact on mortality after aortic valve replacement Heart, April 1, 2009; 95(7): 592 - 592. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Mascherbauer and H Baumgartner The authors' reply: Heart, April 1, 2009; 95(7): 592 - 593. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pibarot and J. G. Dumesnil Prosthetic Heart Valves: Selection of the Optimal Prosthesis and Long-Term Management Circulation, February 24, 2009; 119(7): 1034 - 1048. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Moon, J. S. Lawton, N. Moazami, N. A. Munfakh, M. K. Pasque, and R. J. Damiano Jr. POINT: Prosthesis-patient mismatch does not affect survival for patients greater than 70 years of age undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2009; 137(2): 278 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mohty, J. G. Dumesnil, N. Echahidi, P. Mathieu, F. Dagenais, P. Voisine, and P. Pibarot Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Long-Term Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement: Influence of Age, Obesity, and Left Ventricular Dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 6, 2009; 53(1): 39 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Mascherbauer, R Rosenhek, C Fuchs, E Pernicka, U Klaar, C Scholten, M Heger, G Wollenek, G Maurer, and H Baumgartner Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch after valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has no impact on short-term and long-term mortality Heart, December 1, 2008; 94(12): 1639 - 1645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-A. Clavel, C. Fuchs, I. G. Burwash, G. Mundigler, J. G. Dumesnil, H. Baumgartner, J. Bergler-Klein, R. S. Beanlands, P. Mathieu, J. Magne, et al. Predictors of Outcomes in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Results of the Multicenter TOPAS Study Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14_suppl_1): S234 - S242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Masuda, H. Kado, Y. Ando, A. Shiose, T. Nakano, K. Fukae, Y. Tanoue, and R. Tominaga Intermediate-term results after the aortic valve replacement using bileaflet mechanical prosthetic valve in children Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, July 1, 2008; 34(1): 42 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kohsaka, S. Mohan, S. Virani, V.-V. Lee, A. Contreras, G. J. Reul, and S. A. Coulter Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects long-term survival after mechanical valve replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2008; 135(5): 1076 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Bleiziffer, W B Eichinger, I Hettich, D Ruzicka, M Wottke, R Bauernschmitt, and R Lange Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on exercise capacity in patients after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement Heart, May 1, 2008; 94(5): 637 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nozohoor, J. Nilsson, C. Luhrs, A. Roijer, and J. Sjogren Influence of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Diastolic Heart Failure After Aortic Valve Replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 85(4): 1310 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kulik, M. Al-Saigh, V. Chan, R. G. Masters, P. Bedard, B.-K. Lam, F. D. Rubens, P. J. Hendry, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel Enlargement of the Small Aortic Root During Aortic Valve Replacement: Is There a Benefit? Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 94 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Stented Pericardial and Porcine Valves Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 857 - 894. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Monin, M. Monchi, M. E.W. Kirsch, H. Petit-Eisenmann, S. Baleynaud, C. Chauvel, D. Metz, C. Adams, J.-P. Quere, P. Gueret, et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2620 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Peterson, M. A. Borger, C. M. Feindel, and T. E. David Aortic Annular Enlargement During Aortic Valve Replacement: Improving Results With Time Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2044 - 2049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pibarot and J. G. Dumesnil Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the mitral position: Old concept, new evidences J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1405 - 1408. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pibarot and J. G Dumesnil Prevention of valve prosthesis--patient mismatch before aortic valve replacement: does it matter and is it feasible? Heart, May 1, 2007; 93(5): 549 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bleiziffer, W. B Eichinger, I. Hettich, R. Guenzinger, D. Ruzicka, R. Bauernschmitt, and R. Lange Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: which is the best method? Heart, May 1, 2007; 93(5): 615 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Bridges, S. M. O'Brien, J. C. Cleveland, E. B. Savage, J. S. Gammie, F. H. Edwards, E. D. Peterson, and F. L. Grover Association between indices of prosthesis internal orifice size and operative mortality after isolated aortic valve replacement J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2007; 133(4): 1012 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kulik, I. G. Burwash, V. Kapila, T. G. Mesana, and M. Ruel Long-Term Outcomes After Valve Replacement for Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-553 - I-558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |