|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:27-31
© 2006 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Received for publication October 25, 2005; revisions received December 30, 2005; accepted for publication January 13, 2006. * Address for reprints: Ozan Emiroglu, MD, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cebeci Kalp Merkezi, Dikimevi, 06620 Ankara, Turkey. (Email: ozanemiroglu{at}mail.com).
OBJECTIVE: Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade after ascending aortic surgery are higher than anticipated after cardiac surgery. We evaluated a thin closed-suction drain system to prevent posterior pericardial effusion in patients undergoing ascending aortic surgery.
METHODS: One hundred forty patients who underwent ascending aortic surgery were prospectively randomized into group A and group B. In group A (n = 70) we used a 32F drain placed anteriorly overlying the heart and a 16F thin drain placed retrocardially. In group B (n = 70) only a 32F drain placed anteriorly was used. In group A we removed the large drain on the first postoperative day and continued drainage with the thin drain until the drainage was less than 50 mL in a 24-hour period. In group B we removed the drain after the first postoperative day when the drainage was less than 50 mL in an 8-hour period. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters of the patients were compared.
RESULTS: No significant posterior pericardial effusion and late cardiac tamponade developed in patients in group A. In group B 10 (14.3%) patients experienced significant posterior pericardial effusion and 4 (5.7%) patients experienced late cardiac tamponade; the incidence of significant pericardial effusion in group B was significantly higher (P = .001). Postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation developed in 6 (10.4%) patients in group A and in 18 (32.7%) patients in group B (P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that effective posterior drainage is important to prevent posterior pericardial effusion, and use of a thin drain placed retrocardially appears to be sufficient for these results.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. B. Inan, L. Yazicioglu, and U. Ozyurda Reply to the Editor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2011; 142(3): 722 - 722. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pompilio, S. Filippini, M. Agrifoglio, E. Merati, G. Lauri, S. Salis, F. Alamanni, and A. Parolari Determinants of pericardial drainage for cardiac tamponade following cardiac surgery Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2011; 39(5): e107 - e113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tabata, T. Shimokawa, T. Fukui, S. Manabe, Y. Sato, and S. Takanashi New Uncoated Vascular Prosthesis Reduces Mediastinal Tube Drainage After Thoracic Aortic Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2011; 91(3): 899 - 902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Inan, L. Yazicioglu, S. Eryilmaz, M. Sirlak, D. Cetintas, B. Kaya, and U. Ozyurda Effects of prophylactic indomethacin treatment on postoperative pericardial effusion after aortic surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2011; 141(2): 578 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Ashikhmina, H. V. Schaff, L. J. Sinak, Z. Li, J. A. Dearani, R. M. Suri, S. J. Park, T. A. Orszulak, and T. M. Sundt III Pericardial Effusion After Cardiac Surgery: Risk Factors, Patient Profiles, and Contemporary Management Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2010; 89(1): 112 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |