|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:428-434
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
University of Virginia, Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Charlottesville, Va.
Read at the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of the Western Thoracic Surgical Association, Sun Valley, Idaho, June 21-24, 2006.
Received for publication June 17, 2006; revisions received September 9, 2006; accepted for publication September 20, 2006. * Address for reprints: T. Brett Reece, MD, University of Virginia Health System, Department of Surgery, PO. Box 801359, MR4 Building, Room 3116, Charlottesville, VA 22908. (Email: tbr5q{at}virginia.edu).
OBJECTIVE: The site of cannulation for the repair of ascending aortic dissection remains controversial. It is not clear whether cannulation of the dissected vessel is safe or even preferred. We hypothesized that cannulation of the dissected aorta could be done safely with acceptable complication and mortality rates in this high-risk population.
METHODS: The charts of repairs of acute ascending aortic dissections (n = 70) from 1996 to 2005 were reviewed. Cannulation was accomplished in 24 patients via the dissected aorta (central) and in 46 patients through cannulation of the femoral or axillary artery (peripheral). All were converted to sidearm cannulation of the graft for reperfusion. Groups were compared on the basis of comorbidities in addition to mortality, complications, hospital stays and final disposition.
RESULTS: The groups were comparable on the basis of age and preoperative comorbidities. Similarly, there were no differences in bypass time, crossclamp time, or hypothermic circulatory arrest time between groups. Hospital mortality and postoperative complications, including stroke, were similar between groups, but the peripheral group experienced more cardiac events (peripheral 15% vs central 0%; P < .05) and higher mortality than the central group (peripheral 19.5% vs central 4.2%; P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Direct cannulation of the dissected aorta was safe compared with peripheral cannulation in these patients. Inasmuch as these data demonstrate that cannulation of the dissected ascending aorta is safe, this technique can be used to tailor the cannulation approach to specific anatomic and patient characteristics that might optimize postoperative outcomes in this disease entity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Khaladj, M. Shrestha, S. Peterss, M. Strueber, M. Karck, M. Pichlmaier, A. Haverich, and C. Hagl Ascending aortic cannulation in acute aortic dissection type A: the Hannover experience Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 792 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimokawa, S. Takanashi, N. Ozawa, and T. Itoh Management of intraoperative malperfusion syndrome using femoral artery cannulation for repair of acute type A aortic dissection. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1619 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Inoue and T. Ueda Central cannulation in acute aortic dissection repair J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 545 - 545. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Santini and A. Mazzucco How should I cannulate my next acute aortic dissection? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 545 - 547. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Farhat, T. Sassard, and O. Jegaden Central cannulation in acute aortic dissection repair: What else? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 547 - 548. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |