JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Derek von Haag
Royce Calhoun
David Follette
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Follette, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Follette, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mediastinum

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:746-752
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


General Thoracic Surgery

Advances in positron emission tomography technology have increased the need for surgical staging in non–small cell lung cancer

Benjamin Enoch Lee, MDa, Derek von Haag, MDa, Teri Lown, RN, OCNb, Derick Lau, MD, PhDc, Royce Calhoun, MDa, David Follette, MDa,*

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California at Davis, Cancer Center, Sacramento, Calif
b University of California at Davis, Cancer Center, Sacramento, Calif
c Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of California at Davis, Cancer Center, Sacramento, Calif.

Read at the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of the Western Thoracic Surgical Association, Sun Valley, Idaho, June 21-24, 2006.

Received for publication June 18, 2006; revisions received October 2, 2006; accepted for publication October 24, 2006.

* Address for reprints: David Follette, MD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California at Davis, UC Davis Cancer Center, 4501 X St, Sacramento, CA 95817. (Email: david.follette{at}ucdmc.ucdavis.edu).

Objectives: Pretreatment staging of patients with non–small cell lung cancer is critically important in determining an appropriate treatment plan. As positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) are proven complementary modalities in clinical staging, recent advances in PET technology have brought forth integrated PET/CT as the new standard. We tested the hypothesis that improvements in PET technology have not increased the sensitivity or specificity of PET in the staging of non–small cell lung cancer to an extent that surgical staging is no longer required.

Methods: This is a retrospective, single-institution review of 336 patients from 1995 to 2005 with biopsy-proven non–small cell lung cancer who underwent [18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose–PET before mediastinal lymph node sampling by cervical mediastinoscopy or thoracotomy. Clinical records, histopathologic reports, and PET findings were reviewed. Data were analyzed by the Pearson {chi}2 test.

Results: Within the study population, 210 patients had routine PET and 126 had integrated PET/CT. For detecting mediastinal metastases the sensitivities of PET versus integrated PET/CT were 61.1% versus 85.7% (P < .05), specificities were 94.3% versus 80.6% (P < .001), positive predictive values were 68.8% versus 55.8%, negative predictive values were 92.1% versus 95.2%, and overall accuracy was 88.6% versus 81.7%.

Conclusions: Improvements in PET technology have increased integrated PET/CT sensitivity at the cost of significantly decreased specificity. Although it may appear that integrated PET/CT incurs fewer false negative results, the dramatic increase in false positive results reinforces the notion that integrated PET/CT should be used only as an adjunct to clinical staging and that surgical staging remains the gold standard in non–small cell lung cancer.



Abbreviations and Acronyms CI = confidence interval; CT = computed tomography; FDG = [18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose; NS = not significant; NSCLC = non–small cell lung cancer; PET = positron emission tomography; SUV = standard uptake value





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. S. Groth, B. A. Whitson, J. D'Cunha, M. A. Maddaus, M. Alsharif, and R. S. Andrade
Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes: A Single Institution's Early Learning Curve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 86(4): 1104 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
S. M Woolley and P. B. Rajesh
The Use of PET and PET/CT Scanning in Lung Cancer
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, October 1, 2008; 16(5): 353 - 354.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
B. E. Lee, J. Redwine, C. Foster, E. Abella, T. Lown, D. Lau, and D. Follette
Mediastinoscopy might not be necessary in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with mediastinal lymph nodes having a maximum standardized uptake value of less than 5.3
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2008; 135(3): 615 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.