|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1242-1251
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
a Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group, San Bruno, Calif
b Ischemia Research and Education Foundation, San Bruno, Calif
c Departments of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
d St Michaels Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
e Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY
f University of Heidelberg, Germany
g University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
h Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
i Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
j California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, Calif
k Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif.
Received for publication April 26, 2005; revisions received November 8, 2006; accepted for publication December 6, 2006. * Address for reprints: Elisabeth Ott, MD, c/o Editorial Office, The Ischemia Research and Education Foundation, 1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 480, San Bruno, CA 94066. (Email: diane{at}iref.org).
Objective: In an international, prospective, observational study, we contrasted adverse vascular outcomes among four countries and then assessed practice pattern differences that may have contributed to these outcomes.
Methods: A total of 5065 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery were analyzed at 70 international medical centers, and from this pool, 3180 patients from the 4 highest enrolling countries were selected. Fatal and nonfatal postoperative ischemic complications related to the heart, brain, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract were assessed by blinded investigators.
Results: In-hospital mortality was 1.5% (9/619) in the United Kingdom, 2.0% (9/444) in Canada, 2.7% (34/1283) in the United States, and 3.8% (32/834) in Germany (P = .03). The rates of the composite outcome (morbidity and mortality) were 12% in the United Kingdom, 16% in Canada, 18% in the United States, and 24% in Germany (P < .001). After adjustment for difference in case-mix (using the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) and practice, country was not an independent predictor for mortality. However, there was an independent effect of country on composite outcome. The practices that were associated with adverse outcomes were the intraoperative use of aprotinin, intraoperative transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma or platelets, lack of use of early postoperative aspirin, and use of postoperative heparin.
Conclusions: Significant between-country differences in perioperative outcome exist and appear to be related to hematologic practices, including administration of antifibrinolytics, fresh-frozen plasma, platelets, heparin, and aspirin. Understanding the mechanisms for these observations and selection of practices associated with improved outcomes may result in significant patient benefit.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |